News

LifesiteNews.com Analysis of Leaders Debate

Canadian Leaders Debate Strengthens Case for Voting For Candidates Rather Than Party or Leader

LifeSite
LifeSite
Comments 

OTTAWA, June 16, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Federal election leaders’ debate Tuesday night left many of Canada’s social conservatives dismayed with the response of all the leaders to the abortion and homosexual issues.  LifeSiteNews.com has prepared an analysis of the debate headlining the following points:  * Word “Abortion” Avoided by All Leaders * All Leaders Misled Canadians That There is a Right to Choose * Stephen Harper Responses Disappointing * Harper Would Use Notwithstanding Against Child Porn, But Not Abortion * Sexual “orientation” and the Charter * Martin Elevates Trudeau Liberal Charter to Mythical Status * Harper Credits Family Principles of New Immigrants, But Only as “Opinion”  * Concern That Conservatives Moving to the Left   See the complete analysis, which is an updated version of Wednesday’s original LifeSiteNews.com report on the debate at:  https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/jun/040617a.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.