News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

July 6, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — After unceremoniously booting mRNA vaccine inventor Dr. Robert Malone from its platform for posting “misinformation” about COVID-19, professional networking site LinkedIn reinstated his account. 

Last week, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., M.S., saw his LinkedIn account deleted after he warned that the technology he discovered, which is used in at least two of the major COVID-19 vaccines on the market, carries risks of heart inflammation and autoimmune reactions, particularly in young people. 

Malone’s warnings came as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced it would add a warning to the fact sheets for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to unexpectedly high rates of heart inflammation connected with the vaccine, particularly among teen boys and young men. 

Despite Malone’s intimate knowledge of mRNA technology and the FDA’s recent admission that cases of heart inflammation have been linked to the mRNA vaccines, the Microsoft-owned professional networking site opted to remove Malone’s account, scrubbing all of his posts. 

In a Twitter thread Wednesday, Malone called LinkedIn’s actions “arbitrary and capricious,” adding that the removal of the account damaged his business and that he “deserve(s) to be compensated.” 

“The historic record of what I have done, stated, figured out (and when) etc. over time is a key part of establishing my credibility and track record as a professional,” Malone added. “And that has been erased completely and arbitrarily without warning or explanation.” 

According to The Epoch Times, a representative from LinkedIn later told the mRNA inventor that he had violated LinkedIn’s user agreement by posting “misleading or inaccurate information” about vaccines and COVID-19.  

But all was not lost, according to a report by TrialSiteNews published yesterday.  

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1070152 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

“LinkedIn recently stepped up and reactivated a prominent member’s account, Dr. Robert Malone,” TrialSite reported. “(T)hanks again to ethical management at (LinkedIn), plus a contribution from a well-connected colleague, the social network not only reinstated Malone but issued an apology.” 

Malone’s LinkedIn page was active at the time of this writing. 

“Compared to some of the censorship-experienced platforms such as Facebook and YouTube, not to mention Twitter, the move by LinkedIn is a breath of fresh air,” TrialSite said. 

Dr. Malone is an internationally recognized scientist in the fields of virology, immunology and molecular biology. He discovered in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and invented mRNA vaccines while working at the Salk Institute in 1988, writing the patent disclosures for mRNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. 

Malone has gained notoriety for publicly questioning the narrative about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, most recently raising concern about evidence suggesting the vaccines may cause increased uterine bleeding in women

On June 23, Malone told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson that he was concerned “the government is not being transparent with us” about the risks of adverse reactions from mRNA vaccines.  

“I am of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not,” Malone said, “especially since these are experimental vaccines.” 

On June 10, Dr. Malone spoke with biologist Bret Weinstein, Ph.D, on the latter’s Dark Horse Podcast. Malone discussed several safety concerns about the mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. During the podcast, Malone warned about potential future autoimmune issues caused by the spike proteins within the mRNA shots.  

Malone noted the FDA was aware that the spike proteins were “biologically active and could travel from the injection site and cause adverse events,” adding that “the spike protein, if biologically active, is very dangerous.” 

Though LinkedIn has reinstated Malone’s account, it was not the only website to attempt to silence his views.  

YouTube censored the three-hour long Dark Horse podcast featuring Malone, with Wikipedia (which its co-founder recently said is “shamelessly hypocritical” and has “systematically purged conservative mainstream media sources”) quickly acting to jettison references to Dr. Malone’s involvement in the development of mRNA vaccines

As reported by LifeSite’s Michael Haynes, an archived version of the RNA vaccines page on Wikipedia from June 14 lists Malone as the creator and initial researcher of the technology. On June 16, the page had been scrubbed of all references to Malone, attributing the discovery of mRNA technology vaguely to “researchers at the Salk Institute, the University of California, San Diego, and Vical.”  

As of the time of Haynes’ report, the Wikipedia page had been updated yet again, giving primary credit for the discovery to Jon Wolff, one of Malone’s collaborators in 1990.  

The current Wikipedia page also pays homage to Katalin Karikó, whom it calls “a scientist behind a key discovery in the development of mRNA vaccines.”  

Karikó, an outspoken proponent of the experimental injections, has been the senior vice president at BioNTech RNA Pharmaceuticals since 2013. BioNTech has partnered with Pfizer to develop, produce, and distribute the COVID-19 mRNA shots.  

TrialSite noted that while LinkedIn’s reinstatement of Dr. Malone’s account on its platform is good news, not everyone may be as fortunate as the doctor. 

“(W)hat about so many other people that fall into this social network filtering process — the undoubtedly hundreds if not thousands of others that are simply making well-intentioned dissenting positions?” asked TrialSite.  

“They shouldn’t be censored and removed from their social media accounts. Nor should the government be telling social media companies what terms are misinformation.” 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.