Featured Image
 mattyw1991 / shutterstock

April 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Government messages to stay home, lockdowns, fear, and disruption of services at hospitals in response to COVID-19 have led to increased “avoidable deaths of both mothers and babies” during the pandemic, a study published this week in The Lancet Global Health found.

“Global maternal and fetal outcomes have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increase in maternal deaths, stillbirth, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and maternal depression,” according to research from several institutions, including the Fetal Medicine Unit at St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and King’s College London.

The study, which combined data from 40 studies worldwide and measured maternal and neonatal health indicators before and during pandemic government restrictions, found considerable disparity between high-income Western countries and poorer developing countries.

‘Matter of urgency’

Rising maternal death rates are a “matter of urgency” in low to middle-income countries like Kenya where unpublished data showed a surge of maternal mortality and pooled data found that women were 37% more likely to die in childbirth during the coronavirus outbreak than before it. The finding is “particularly concerning,” the researchers said, because poor countries already had the world’s highest maternal mortality without the impact of lockdowns and fear.

Forty-two percent of women report being verbally or physically abused during their labor before the pandemic. Now, some are forced to give birth alone, without husbands or doulas.

Analysis of three studies found that women were nearly six-fold (OR = 5.81) more likely to undergo surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy during the pandemic than beforehand, mostly for ruptured ectopic pregnancies.

Pooled data from 12 studies found that babies were 28% more likely to be delivered stillborn during the pandemic in low- and middle-income countries.

The poor outcomes could be linked to reduced access to healthcare, the researchers surmised. “Although maternal anxiety was consistently shown to be increased during the pandemic, health-care providers around the world have reported reduced attendance for routine and unscheduled pregnancy care,” according to the study.

Some women were likely afraid of getting COVID-19 in hospitals and other centers. Others may have been deterred by mandated COVID-19 testing at every visit, with or without symptoms.

Uncounted harm

Government advice to stay at home and reduced public transport and childcare access during lockdowns likely played a role as well, the Lancet researchers said. Women in poor countries do not have access to internet for online consultations.

Women have been more likely to become unemployed and take on more childcare because of nursery and school closures. “The resultant financial and time constraints are likely to have far-reaching consequences for mothers’ physical, emotional, and financial health during pregnancy and in the future,” according to the paper.

Seven of 11 studies reporting on maternal mental health that the Lancet paper looked at reported a statistically significant increase in postnatal depression, maternal anxiety, or both.

Domestic abuse is another likely contributor to the impact on pregnant mothers. An analysis by the National Commission on Covid-19 and Criminal Justice of 18 international and U.S. studies found that violence at home rose by 8.1% early in the lockdowns.

“It is clear that pregnant individuals and babies have been subjected to harm during the pandemic, and the onus is on the academic community, health-care providers, and policy-makers to learn from it,” according to the Lancet paper.

Draconian hospital regulations

Perhaps worse for women who had to navigate a health service and delivery system that has been described as hostile, with 42% of women saying they were verbally or physically abused during their labor before the pandemic, is that COVID restrictions forced them to deliver alone. Husbands, midwives, doulas, and visitors have been routinely banned and even nursing delivery staff cut from the labor and delivery wards during the pandemic. 

As well, unreliable COVID-19 testing, regardless of symptoms, has become a routine feature of delivery wards. Hospitals routinely take babies away from parents if any of them test positive for the virus.

Most hospitals in the Western world have forced women to wear masks during labor and delivery, with reports of women being threatened by hospital staff that they will not be assisted if they take them off and some women saying they were traumatized by the experience.

Fewer pre-term births

A surprising and welcome side-effect of the pandemic measures, though, was the sudden and at first glance, puzzling drop in pre-term births. Findings on pre-term birth in the Lancet study but confirmed reports from Ireland and Denmark early in the pandemic that there were noticeably fewer preterm births and babies in neonatal intensive care wards in Western countries. Some low-income countries had conflicting findings.

In Denmark, 90% fewer low birthweight babies were born and an Irish study found that women were 3.77 times more likely to have a very low-birthweight baby during the previous two decades than during the lockdown.

While there was some speculation that, in spite of increased stress, pregnant women benefitted from reduced commutes and more sleep during the lockdowns there is also a the possibility that full-term births were driven, ironically, by less hospital healthcare. Pregnant women flocked to midwives and home deliveries in America in unprecedented numbers during the pandemic; if unnecessary medical interventions including induced labor, C-section deliveries, and late-pregnancy cervical checks were reduced during the lockdowns, then perhaps that is why more babies were born naturally, full-term, and higher birthweight.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Say 'No' to COVID 'Vaccine Passports'!
  Show Petition Text
217389 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 225000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Powerful nations of the world, including China, the UK, and Canada are discussing plans to require so-called 'vaccine passports' as a condition for travel, and possibly to restrict entry to shopping and entertainment venues.

Israel has already put in place a system to discriminate against those who choose not to take the COVID vaccine, and, in the United States, Joe Biden has signed a new executive order which could pave the way for the implementation of a 'vaccine passport' system. [See more below.]

This kind of medical dictatorship must be resisted, and therefore, we must act quickly before these authoritarian notions take root and spread!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to SAY NO to government 'vaccine passports.' Tell your legislators to respect your freedom not to vaccinate without fear of repercussion.

People should not have to live in fear of government retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping, go to a high school soccer game, travel on public transport, or visit their relatives who live in a different part of the country, or overseas.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished, restricted, or tracked for refusing an experimental vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We will no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question. And, neither can we accept the dictates of some doctors who seem detached from reality and from science.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which asks national political leaders (as well as state and provincial legislators in the U.S. and Canada) to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and NOT introduce 'vaccine passports,' or any other system which would discriminate on the basis of taking the COVID vaccine.


'Biden executive order directs government to evaluate ‘feasibility’ of vaccine passports' -

'China lobbies WHO to develop COVID vaccine passports for all nations' -

'UK advances plans for vaccine passports to travel, enter stores' -

'Canada’s health minister: Gov’t ‘working on the idea of vaccine passports’' -

'European Commission president plans to introduce vaccine passports' -

'Israel’s ‘Green Passport’ vaccination program has created a ‘medical Apartheid,’ distraught citizens say' -

'LA schools to track every kid using Microsoft’s ‘Daily Pass’ COVID app' -

  Hide Petition Text

The U.S.-based advocacy group Evidence Based Birth has a “Sample Informed Consent Form for Refusal to Separate Birthing Parent and Infant” on its website, which mothers giving birth can bring to hospitals.