Patrick Craine

,

McGuinty Liberals: Disagree with sexually-explicit classes? Then you’re ‘homophobic’

Patrick Craine
Patrick Craine

TORONTO, Ontario, October 4, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – An Ontario Tory Party flyer criticizing early sex ed, including the promotion of Gay Pride parades for kindergartners, is “homophobic,” charged Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals on Monday.

But critics say that the flyer makes no comments that could be deemed disrespectful to homosexuals, but merely raises objections to exposing young children to sexually explicit material. If McGuinty is charging the flyer is homophobic, then many Ontario parents are being cast as ‘homophobic’ themselves, they say.

The flyer, endorsed by Tim Hudak’s Progressive Conservative Party, targets the Toronto District School Board’s controversial “anti-homophobia” curriculum that begins discussing homosexual families in kindergarten with teachers reading “Gloria Goes to Gay Pride,” and aims to transform students into social activists by the end of high school.

That curriculum shocked parents last spring in particular because it explicitly forbids parents from opting their kids out of the controversial classes and advises schools not to alert parents in advance.

The Tory flyer was distributed over the weekend in some GTA ridings and has stirred controversy in the lead-up to Thursday’s election.

“The desperate Hudak campaign has resorted to outright lies and manipulation,” claimed the Liberals on Monday.  “The PCs have been distributing a disgusting, homophobic flyer.”

But Hudak has stood by the document, turning it back on McGuinty.

“I think the only person who has explaining to do is Dalton McGuinty, who wants to bring in sex-ed curriculum that starts in Grade One when kids are six years old,” said Hudak.  “And then on top of that, he wants to keep these things hidden from mums and dads. I think that’s wrong.”

Dr. Charles McVety, head of the Institute for Canadian Values, said the Liberals’ accusation that the flyer is ‘homophobic’ is an “attack” on parents who object to such controversial curriculum.

“To teach this stuff to little boys and girls is contrary to what parents want, many parents, I dare say most parents,” McVety told LifeSiteNews.  “It is bullying parents.  If you object to what we’re doing to your children, we will name-call you, we will attack you.”

Vince Agovino, Tory candidate for Willowdale, was one of those who distributed the flyer.  In an accompanying letter, he highlighted quotes from Transport Minister Kathleen Wynne to Xtra that he says signalled a Liberal government “would continue promoting an agenda that promoted these [gay-straight alliance] clubs in Catholic schools.”

“We cannot dismiss these comments as the musings of but one Liberal Cabinet Minister,” he said.  “This election is important for many reasons, and surely the future of parental rights and our children’s education is foremost among them.”

The flyer includes several direct quotes from the curriculum, such as:

“Read some traditional folk tales and fairy tales with the class.  Have students write/illustrate their own ‘gender-bending’ versions.”

“Reclaim Valentine’s Day and celebrate sexual diversity [with a] kissing booth.”

“Don’t want this for your kids?” ask the Tories.  “Parents don’t have a say. … On October 6th, vote against the McGuinty agenda.”

The Liberals have pointed out that much of the TDSB curriculum is the same as when the Tories were in office.  But one key change is the addition of the policy forbidding parents to opt their children out.

They have also emphasized that the TDSB curriculum is distinct from the controversial sex ed curriculum that the McGuinty government shelved last year and intends to bring back in modified form.

But while the TDSB curriculum was not produced by the Ministry of Education, McVety said they are nevertheless responsible for it.  “It is one hundred percent under the purview of the Minister of Education,” he said.  “It is the Toronto version of the provincial curriculum and must be approved by the Ministry.”

LifeSiteNews did not hear back from the Ontario Liberals by press time.

FREE pro-life and pro-family news.

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most. Subscribe today. 

Select Your Edition:


Advertisement
Featured Image
Lisa Bourne

‘You can’t have’ marriage equality ‘without polygamy’

Lisa Bourne
By Lisa Bourne

July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Motivated by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing homosexual “marriage,” a Montana polygamist has filed for a second marriage license, so he can be legally wed to two women at once.

"It's about marriage equality," said Nathan Collier, using homosexual advocates’ term to support marriage redefinition. "You can't have this without polygamy."

Collier, who has has appeared on the TLC reality show Sister Wives with his legal wife Victoria, and his second wife Christine, said he was inspired by the dissent in the Supreme Court decision.

The minority Supreme Court justices said in Friday’s ruling it would open the door to both polygamy and religious persecution.

“It is striking how much of the majority’s reasoning would apply with equal force to the claim of a fundamental right to plural marriage,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.

Collier and his wives applied for a second marriage license earlier this week at the Yellowstone County Courthouse in Billings, a report from the Salt Lake Tribune said.

Collier, who was excommunicated from the Mormon Church for polygamy, married Victoria in 2000 and had a religious wedding ceremony with Christine in 2007. The three have seven children between them and from previous relationships.

"My second wife Christine, who I'm not legally married to, she's put up with my crap for a lot of years. She deserves legitimacy," Collier said.

Yellowstone County officials initially denied the application before saying they would consult with the County Attorney and get him a final answer.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

Bigamy, the holding of multiple marriage licenses, is illegal all 50 states, but Collier plans to sue if his application is denied. Officials expect to have an answer for him next week.

While homosexual “marriage” supporters have long insisted legalization of same-sex unions would not lead to polygamy, pro-life and family advocates have warned all along it would be inevitable with the redefinition of marriage.

“The next court cases coming will push for polygamy, as Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged in his dissent,” said Penny Nance, president of Concerned Women for America, after the Supreme Court ruling. “The chief justice said “the argument for polygamy is actually stronger than that for ‘gay marriage.’ It’s only a matter of time.”

In a piece from the Washington Times, LifeSiteNews Editor-in-Chief and the co-founder of Voice of the Family John-Henry Westen stated the move toward legal polygamy is “just the next step in unraveling how Americans view marriage.”

Advertisement
Featured Image
Christopher Halloran / Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

, , ,

Chris Christie: Clerks must perform same-sex ‘marriages’ regardless of their religious beliefs

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

TRENTON, NJ, July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Chris Christie is not known for nuance. This time, he has turned his fiery personality loose on county clerks and other officials who have religious objections to performing same-sex “marriages.”

In a tone usually reserved for busting teachers' unions, Christie told clerks who hold traditional values, “You took the job, and you took the oath.” He would offer no exemption for an individual whose conscience would not allow him to participate in a union the vast majority of the world's religions deem sinful.

“When you go back and re-read the oath it doesn’t give you an out. You have to do it,” he said.

He told a reporter that there “might” be “individual circumstances” that “merit some examination, but none that come immediately to mind for me.”

“I think for folks who are in the government world, they kind of have to do their job, whether you agree with the law or you don’t,” the pugnacious governor said.

Since the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to legalize homosexual “marriage” last Friday, elected officials have grappled with how to safeguard the rights of those who have deeply held religious beliefs that would not allow them to participate in such a ceremony.

Christie's response differs markedly from other GOP hopefuls' responses to the Supreme Court ruling. Mike Huckabee, for instance, has specifically said that clerks should have conscience rights. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal signed an executive order granting such rights and ordered clerks to wait until a pending court case was fully adjudicated before any clerk issues a marriage license to a homosexual couple.

Christie gave up a legal appeal after a superior court judge struck down his state's voter-approved constitutional marriage protection amendment. New Jersey is the only state where such a low court overturned the will of the voters.

The decision to ignore conscience rights adds to the growing number of Christie's positions that give conservatives pause.

The natural locus of support for a Christie 2016 presidential run is the Republican's socially liberal donor class, for personal as well as political reasons. His wife works on Wall Street, and some of the GOP's high-dollar donors – including Paul Singer – have courted Christie for years.

However, this year Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and to a lesser degree Scott Walker have eclipsed Christie as the preferred candidates of the boardroom donors – who sometimes prefer Democrats to Republicans.

Christie also used language during a speech before the Republican Jewish Coalition last year, which concerned some major GOP donors.

Christie is reportedly spending this weekend with Mitt Romney and his family at Romney's New Hampshire home. Romney declined to enter the 2016 race himself and may be able to open his donor list to Christie's struggling campaign.

Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

After having a girl with Down syndrome, this couple adopted two more

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

LINO LAKE, MN, July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – For most people, having five biological children would have been enough. In fact, for many Americans, large families are treated as a scandal or a burden.

But one family made the decision, not just to have a large family, but to give a home to some of the most vulnerable children in the world: Girls born overseas with Down syndrome.

Lee and Karen Shervheim love all seven of their children, biological or otherwise. Undeterred by having twin boys – Daniel and Andrew, 18 – they had Sam four years later.

They now have three daughters who are all 11 years old. All three have Down syndrome.

And two of them are adopted.

About the time their eight-year-old son, David, was born, Lee and Karen decided to adopt a child with Down syndrome to be a companion to their daughter, Annie.

They made the further unexpected choice to adopt a child from Eastern Europe with the help of Reece's Rainbow, which helps parents adopt children with Down syndrome.

“Between my wife and I, we couldn’t get it out of our heads,” Lee told the Quad City Press. “So many children need families and we knew we could potentially do something about it.”

After originally deciding to adopt Katie, they spent six weeks in Kiev, visiting an orphanage in nearby Kharkov. While there, they decided they may have room in their heart, and their home, for another child.

When they saw a picture of Emie striking the same pose as their biological daughter in one of their photographs, they knew they would come home with two children.

Both girls were the same age as their Annie. She would not lack for companionship, as they worried.

Lee said after the Ukrainian government – finally – completed the paperwork, they returned to the United States, when the real challenges began.

“The unvarnished truth,” Lee told the Press, is that adopting the Russian-speaking special needs children “was really disruptive to our family. They came with so many issues that we had not anticipated.”

After teaching them sign language and appropriate behavior, they moved to Lino Lake, Minnesota and found a new support group in Eagle Brook Church. There they found personal assistance and spiritual solace.

Every year in the past seven years has been better and better, they say.

“I think my girls can do almost anything they want to do,” he said, “and that’s what I want to help them become.”

The family's devotion is fueled by their faith, and it informs the sense of humor Lee showed in a tweet during the 2014 midterm elections:

It takes a special person to believe in the potential of the “mentally retarded,” as they were once labeled. Today, 90 percent of all babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in the womb will be aborted. The percentage is higher in some countries. Some have even spoken of "a world without people with Down syndrome."

Their God, and their experience, tell them that every child has infinite worth and potential, Lee told local media, and he would encourage anyone to follow his footsteps and adopt a Down syndrome child – or two.

“The message is that it really doesn’t matter where you started or where you came from,” Lee said. “There are endless opportunities for everyone, whether they have disabilities or not. They deserve a shot.”

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook