News

By Patrick B. Craine

LANSING, Michigan, November 12, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Five years after Michigan voters embedded true marriage in the state constitution, a Democrat representative has introduced a bill to overturn the ban on same-sex “marriage.”

In proposing the new measure last week, Rep. Pam Byrnes, the House speaker pro tempore from Washtenaw County, followed through on a promise she made at a June homosexual rights rally in Lansing.

She made her move only days after voters in the city of Kalamazoo approved a ballot initiative guaranteeing special rights for homosexual and gender-confused individuals.  Byrnes claimed this vote indicated a “significant change” in public opinion since the state-wide vote in 2004, according to the Kalamazoo Gazette.

The 2004 constitutional amendment, which banned both same-sex “marriage” and civil unions, easily passed with 58.6% of the vote.

Same-sex “marriage” supporters, however, have pointed to a June 2009 poll that seems to indicate a fall in support for natural marriage among Michiganders.  The Glengariff poll of 600 voters showed that 48% favored true marriage, only slightly higher than the 46.5% who were in favor of legalizing same-sex “marriage.”  The poll also showed that 63.7% now favor legalizing same-sex civil unions, with similar rights to marriage, while only 31.1% were opposed.

Byrnes' measure includes a repeal of the constitutional amendment, an explicit legalization of same-sex “marriage” in the state, and a repeal of state laws not allowing the recognition of same-sex “marriages” from other states.

She will require a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate in order to get the constitutional question back on the state ballot for November 2010.

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Support Buckles for Maintaining Same-sex “Marriage” Ban in Michigan: Poll 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.