News
Featured Image
Michigan Gov. Gretchen WhitmerNic Antaya / Getty Images

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

LANSING, Michigan (LifeSiteNews) – Michigan Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer issued several line-item vetoes Thursday for the state’s $22.2 billion education budget, including cutting provisions that would have supported pregnancy support options except abortion and stem-cell research excluding the use of human embryos.

The Detroit News reported that the budget contained $1 million for “pregnant and parenting student services” at community college and university campuses, with language supporting recommendations for care, delivery, foster care, adoption or family planning but forbidding abortion referrals, as well as $5 million for “ethical stem cell/fetal tissue research,” excluding “any research on aborted fetal tissue.”

In her veto message, Whitmer claimed that the provisions “would create a gag rule preventing reproductive health-service providers from even mentioning abortion and otherwise make it harder for women to get the health care they need,” and more generally “harm women’s health care.”

Whitmer further claimed that the items were unconstitutional on the grounds that the Michigan Constitution gives institutions of higher education “general supervision of its institution and the control and direction of all expenditures from the institution’s funds,” yet the language at issue “deprives an institution of higher education with the supervisory control and budgetary independence provided by those sections.”

Michigan House Appropriations Committee chair and Republican state Rep. Thomas Albert responded by accusing Whitmer of taking a selective approach to “choice,” in that she only applies the preeminent pro-abortion buzzword to “the deadly choice that ends a human life.”

“Many pregnant women may need assistance to continue work on earning their degrees, and the resources the governor vetoed today would have helped them,” Albert continued, adding, “I do not understand why the governor is opposed to focusing on proven and promising research methods that do not involve aborted babies or barbaric practices with their remains. Human beings deserve to be treated with dignity — not bought or sold like a basic commodity.”

With the fall of Roe v. Wade effectively shutting down the abortion industry in numerous states, abortion allies accuse pro-lifers of depriving women of “essential” health care. In fact, the pro-life movement has long operated and supported crisis pregnancy centers, which offer a wide range of support to women facing unplanned and unwanted pregnancies, and have outnumbered Planned Parenthood locations since before the end of Roe (2,700+ CPCs versus roughly 600 PPs). Additionally, there are more than 17,000 federally-qualified health centers and related/similar providers.

Despite being relieved at this, however, pro-abortion voices such as Whitmer, President Joe Biden, and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren have condemned life-affirming pregnancy care options.

As for the stem cell provision, stem cells have for decades been one of the most promising fields of medical research, with applications to the treatment of countless diseases, though it has been marred by controversy over one particular means of obtaining them: destroying human embryos.

Embryo-destructive research was originally rationalized on the grounds that embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have the ability to become any type of tissue. But investment in this subset of the field has been steadily declining over the years as science has learned how to induce pluripotency in adult stem cells from other sources, such as bone marrow and umbilical cord blood.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

5 Comments

    Loading...