Tuesday August 11, 1998


LONDON, Aug 11 (LSN) – On Sunday the Electronic Telegraph reported on new evidence revealing that American sex researcher Alfred Kinsey based most of his findings on the accounts of a lone predatory pedophile. The diaries of the pedophile whose identity Kinsey concealed were exposed publicly for the first time yesterday on British television. Rex King, referred to by Kinsey as “Mr. Green” sexually abused at least 800 children and detailed his abuse in diaries which Kinsey used as “scientific research” supporting his theories on sexuality which sowed the seeds for the sexual revolution with their acceptance of homosexuality and promiscuity.

The publication in 1948 of Alfred Kinsey’s landmark study “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” became the benchmark against which all subsequent sex studies were measured, and its implicit calls for tolerance resonate to this day. In a chapter entitled “Early Sexual Growth and Activity,” Kinsey featured charts in which “trained persons” measured incidences of “orgasm” in children as young as two months.

To Kinsey, the sex between a husband and wife is no different morally, physically or socially from that of sex between the same genders, between children and adults, or even between humans and animals. And to Kinsey, age was not much of a factor. In a volume on Female sexuality he remarks, “It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched.”

See the article at;=wn5fiQ…


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.