Featured Image
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

News, ,

100+ ‘moderate’ Republicans back pro-abort Democrat over pro-life stalwart in Kansas gov. race

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

One of the nation's most pro-life governors is facing growing opposition from his own party -- and some of that opposition has backed a pro-abortion candidate to replace him.

More than 100 self-described “moderate Republicans” have thrown their support behind a pro-abortion Democrat against an embattled pro-life Republican Governor Sam Brownback of Kansas, saying economic matters are of greater importance than abortion.

The 100 Republicans have endorsed Paul Davis, a supporter of abortion and the top Democrat in the state House. Critics have focused their ire on what they say is an irresponsible approach to the state budget -- Brownback's tax cuts are being blamed for revenues that are $300 million below projections -- as well as education budget cuts.

Brownback has a record of pro-life support going back more than a decade.

As Senator, Brownback supported overturning Roe v. Wade, and stood against taxpayer funding for abortion. In 2007, he voted in favor of an amendment that would have prevented federal grants from going to most organizations that conduct abortions for reasons other than to save the life of the mother.

During a brief campaign for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008, Brownback accused candidate Mitt Romney of being soft on the issue of abortion.

Since entering the governor's office in January 2011, Brownback has worked to make Kansas the first state to defund Planned Parenthood, and has passed numerous other abortion restrictions. Among these restrictions are two that were signed just months after he entered the governor's mansion: A bill that limited abortions after 22 weeks' gestation because of fetal pain, and another that required consent from both parents before a minor could have an abortion. He also compared abortion to slavery in his 2014 “State of the State” address.

Davis, on the other hand, has a record of supporting pro-abortion legislation as a member of the State House. In 2007, he opposed a measure that would have made it a crime to harm an unborn child under certain circumstances, and defined an unborn child as a human from the point of conception. According to Vote Smart, the pro-life legislation passed the House with such overwhelming support that it was eventually signed by then-governor Kathleen Sebelius, a supporter of abortion.

Sebelius, who was the Obama cabinet secretary responsible for implementing the HHS Mandate of the Affordable Care Act, has joined Davis at least once on the campaign trail. Sebelius is a prominent Catholic supporter of abortion whose bishop has banned her from receiving Communion. As governor, Sebelius was closely associated with scandal related to abortion clinics in her state, and she vetoed a bill that would have limited late-term abortions in Kansas.

Davis also appears to disagree with Brownback on marriage. While the incumbent is a public supporter of marriage, Davis has been at odds with marriage groups in the past, such as when he voted against a bill earlier this year that would protect religious freedom by individuals, groups, and businesses. That bill passed the House, but was held up in the Senate. Brownback supported a similar bill in 2012.

Governor Brownback “has been the real deal, working to advance both economic and social conservatism,” Family Research Council Vice President of Government Affairs David Christensen told LifeSiteNews. “A number of the Republicans in Kansas attacking the governor are Republican-In-Name-Only, and it would be a huge mistake for the GOP to ignore the factually real strides made on behalf of tax cuts, increased numbers of jobs, and increased funding of education, as well as the advances made on social issues.”

“One example is Governor Brownback’s leadership in creating the Midwest Stem Cell Therapy Center, a serious model for governors across the country to copy,” Christensen said. “It promotes ethical ways to advance science and produce treatments for Americans suffering from so many diseases, and is already treating patients for serious conditions.”

Brownback's troubles with other Republicans can be traced at least as far back as mid-2012. At the time, fiscally and socially conservative groups helped oust several moderate Republicans, which led to the tax and pro-life policies enacted in 2012 and afterward. However, the budget deficit combined with a bond rating drop by Moody's Investors Service left critics outraged.

Jim Yonally, chairman of the anti-Brownback group Traditional Republicans for Common Sense, told LifeSiteNews his group is made up of “former legislators or state party officials.” He told LifeSiteNews that while the organization has not endorsed Davis, “many of our members, as individuals, have.

“As for the topic of abortion, we have never discussed it,” said Yonally.

“It's not that we don't care about abortion. It's just that we think there are more pressing issues in Kansas,” he said, citing “a fair tax system,” educational funding, and the political appointment process as “our major challenges.”

Wint Winters of Republicans for Kansas Values, which is also publicly critical of Brownback, told LifeSiteNews that “the issue of pro-life or pro-choice is not really a defining issue for Kansans.” He said that there are 10 issues as to why his group stands with Davis, and “none of them relate to abortion.”

“The abortion issue is important to the people of Kansas, and to certain members of our group, but that's not what brought this group together. What brought this group together is concern about taxes and the budget,” he said.

Most of the 100 backers are no longer elected officials, including some have been ousted since Brownback entered office. Kansas.com reports that the Executive Director of the GOP in Kansas, Clay Barker, called the support for Davis “sour grapes.”

A Rasmussen poll conducted last week showed Davis leading Brownback by 10 points, with support from 30 percent of Republicans and 20 percent of self-described conservatives. The race has been categorized as “Safe Democrat” by Rasmussen.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Brownback supporters note that the U.S. Congress' Joint Economic Committee shows that as of June 2014, Kansas' unemployment rate was 4.9 percent, well below the national average of 6.1 percent that month. But critics such as the editorial board of the The Kansas City Star, point to how Kansas' job growth has been poor compared to other states. 



Advertisement
Featured Image
A photo of Kim Tucci at 25 weeks gestation Erin Elizabeth Photography
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

News,

‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
Image
An ultrasound of the five different compartments, each with its own baby, inside Kim's womb.

AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life. 

“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September. 

“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote. 

Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds. 

The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again. 

After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test. 

“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.

The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five. 

“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”

“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.

Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.” 

“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”

“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.” 

“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.” 

“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born. 

The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well. 



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Jordanian Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein, the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights UN Photo/Paulo Filgueiras
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

News

UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads. 

The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution. 

“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters. 

UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.

“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.

But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it. 

The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”

Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.

“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said. 

While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms. 

“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added. 

Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born. 

“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.

“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
JStone / Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

News,

Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.

“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.

"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.

There have been over 58,000,000 abortions since the 1973 court ruling legalizing abortion in all 50 states, according to National Right to Life.

That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.

“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."

Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.

All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.

Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.

On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”

Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.

At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.

But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.



Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook