News
Featured Image

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

OTTAWA, Ontario, July 27, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police  has praised a highly controversial “hate speech” bill introduced by Prime Minister Trudeau’s Liberal Party, saying it would give cops the power to “do something” about online “hate.”  

“An amendment to this section of the Code I believe will have a positive effect as far as our ability to do something about online hate when something needs to be done,” said Cpl. Anthony Statham of the RCMP’s British Columbia Hate Crimes Team, according to Blacklock’s Reporter as reported by the Western Standard.  

Statham was commenting on Bill C-36, which was introduced by Justice Minister David Lametti just before Canada’s House of Commons closed for summer break.  

The bill is titled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act (hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech).” If passed bloggers and social media users could be targeted for speaking their minds.  

Canada banned hate speech in 1970, but Statham said that the 1970 law did not define what constituted “hate” speech and stated that what law enforcement needs is “the ability to use the law effectively.”  

Statham said that no law in Canada regulates speech, claiming that under Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, “our freedom of expression is protected. So there is no such thing as free speech in Canada, only freedom of expression.” 

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, Statham seemed to welcome the new piece of legislation.  

“The government is now proposing to add a definition of hatred under this section of the Code,” said Statham, adding that he thinks the “proposal to do that is a very good thing.”  

Statham then said that Bill C-36, if passed, would “equip law enforcement to see more things through to charges in this country.” 

— Article continues below Petition —
Canada's Health Minister: Make abortion pill reversal information available
  Show Petition Text
2226 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Many women who choose to undergo a medical abortion procedure (Mifegymiso in Canada) change their minds having taken the first pill.

And now, a safe and effective procedure called abortion pill reversal has been developed to assist these women in an attempt to help them save their pre-born child from the effects of this first pill (Mifepristone).

Abortion advocates are currently engaged in a campaign to silence the message that Alliance for Life Ontario is providing women undergoing a medical abortion in Canada, including even calling facts “mis-information”.

Our message is that there is a safe, effective (64%-68%) method that may save their child if they have second thoughts after starting the Mifegymiso process.

That's why Alliance for Life Ontario and LifeSiteNews are now partnering on this petition: To give Canadian women a second chance at choice!

Abortion Pill Reversal is being offered around the world with 2,000 little ones saved to-date.

But, in Canada, abortion advocates do not want women to have a second chance at choice! Alliance for Life Ontario's Facebook page has been taken down after erroneous complaints, and now their website abortionpillreversal.ca is being attacked.

Women deserve to know the truth about this second chance at choice and to know there are physicians trained and willing to help them try and save their child, if that is their choice.

We need your help to let the Minister of Health know that Canadian women do not give up their right to the truth when they choose induced abortion.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition today! Thank you.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Abortion Pill Reversal - A Second Chance: https://abortionpillreversal.ca/

  Hide Petition Text

“An amendment to this section of the Code, I believe, will have a positive effect as far as our ability to do something about online hate when something needs to be done,” he added. 

Bill C-36 includes text to amend Canada’s Criminal Code and Human Rights Act to define “hatred” as “the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain (haine).”   

If passed, the bill would theoretically allow a tribunal to judge anyone who has a complaint of online “hate” leveled against them, even if he has not committed a crime. If found guilty, the person would be in violation of the new law and could face fines of $70,000 as well as house arrest.  

According to the text of Bill C-36, it would become a discriminatory practice to communicate “or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the internet or other means of telecommunications in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.” 

The text of the bill does say that content from social media platforms which “discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends” would be exempt from the new law.  

However, the government said that the new bill would apply to most public communications by individual users on the internet. These would include social media, personal websites, and mass emails, as well as in online news sites, blog posts, and even user-comment sections. 

If passed, Bill C-36 will also resurrect Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Section 13 was a controversial hate speech law under the Human Rights Act that was abolished in 2013.   

Bill C-36 is the second piece of legislation that deals with censorship that was pushed by Trudeau’s Liberals in June. 

Canada’s House of Commons passed the controversial internet regulation Bill C-10 on June 22 at 1:30 AM. 

Bill C-10, known as “An Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act,” has drawn fire for its targeting of user-generated content on social media platforms.  

The bill would force websites, including YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, to remove content deemed “harmful” within 24 hours, and compel sites such as Netflix to have more Canadian content.  

Bill C-10 failed to pass the Senate during the last day of debate on June 29, before the upper chamber broke for the summer.   

Both Bill C-36 and Bill C-10 will die if Trudeau calls an election this summer or autumn, as is anticipated.  

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, Canada’s Heritage Ministry produced a June 16 internal note that stated Twitter content “steals and damages lives,” adding that  it “intimidates and obscures valuable voices,” which prevents “a truly democratic debate.” 

Conservative opinion writer Spencer Fernando gave a scathing review of Bill C-36 in a report he posted today, saying “With Bill C-10, and now Bill C-36, there can be zero doubt that the Trudeau Liberal government is engaged in an attack on your freedom of expression.”  

According to Fernando, Bill C-36 is “incredibly dangerous, goes against Canada’s values, and must be stopped.”   

Contact information: 

The Honourable Steven Guilbeault – Minister of Canadian Heritage  
15 Eddy Street, 12th Floor  
Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0M5  
Telephone: 819-997-7788  
Email: [email protected] 

MP Michelle Rempel Garner  
Conservative shadow minister for industry and economic development  
Suite 115, 70 Country Hills Landing NW  
Calgary, AB T3K 2L2  
Telephone: 403-216-7777  
Email: [email protected] 

Justin Trudeau – Office of the Prime Minister  
80 Wellington Street  
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2 
Fax: 613-941-6900  
[email protected] 
https://pm.gc.ca/en/connect/contact  

David Lametti  
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada  
284 Wellington Street  
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8  
Email: [email protected] 
Use online contact form here.  

To contact your member of parliament (MP), click here.  

To contact members of Canada’s senate, click here.  

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.