OTTAWA, Sept 24 ( – Family and children’s issues critic for Canada’s Official Opposition, Eric Lowther, issued another statement against the upcoming UNICEF Canada and Elections Canada “National Election for the Rights of Youth,” and is urging Canadians to make their opposition to the initiative known at all levels of government. He recommended 7 reasons for opposing the initiative. Lowther explains that concerned citizens need to contact “the Prime Minister, the Government House Leader, your federal MP, your provincial MLA/MPP/MNA,  Elections Canada, and your local school board” to object to the vote. 

The Seven Reasons Why Canadians Should Object to Elections Canada’s ‘Child Rights’ Vote are: 

1. Elections Canada’s “Child Rights” vote is disrespectful of parents 2. Elections Canada’s “Child Rights” vote is manipulative of children 3. Elections Canada (EC) should remain non-political, and not organize an exercise whose results could be used as a political tool by lobby groups 4. Elections Canada is exceeding its mandate with this “child rights” vote 5. Elections Canada is interfering with provincial jurisdiction over education 6. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is the wrong vehicle to teach kids about democracy 7. The timing of the vote is itself political  

Further explanation and contacts are available in today’s LifeSite Special Report.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.