(LifeSiteNews) – One of the approaches used to determine whether COVID-19 may be a falsified pandemic is to observe the legal actions, plans, and strategies leading up to and during COVID-19 in any way relevant to emerging infectious diseases, vaccinations, or pandemics.
Previous articles discussed several of those legal actions, plans, and strategies which suggest that COVID-19 may be a falsified pandemic “exercise,” “operational exercise,” “exercise program,” or something similar. “Hoax” would also accurately describe a falsified pandemic, but the aforementioned terminology appears to be what is used in U.S. federal law, policy, strategies, and other documents.
Possibly one of the most significant indications that COVID-19 may be a falsified pandemic “exercise” or “exercise program” is discovered in a law that was enacted on October 9, 2019 – only a few months before the reported outbreak of COVID-19.
Most of the law is in regard to a specific national exercise to test preparedness for terrorism. But within the law is an odd update to the overall U.S. national program which tests or “exercises” preparedness for national security threats. This program is named the National Exercise Program and is developed, led, and conducted by the Department of Homeland Security and other federal bureaus and departments.
US National Exercise Program
Previous articles discussed the National Exercise Program and this article will not completely elaborate. A brief description is:
The National Exercise Program (NEP) is the primary national-level mechanism for validating national preparedness. As part of the National Preparedness System, the NEP is a key component in developing a culture of preparedness, empowering communities and individuals to become more resilient against the threats and hazards that Americans face.
The National Preparedness System provides the overarching framework supporting nationwide efforts to build, sustain, and deliver the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation. Within the National Preparedness System, exercises provide the ability to examine and assess plans, validate capabilities, improve coordination, and identify strengths and areas for improvement. (Page 1)
Some National-Level Exercises may be classified – which means they may be covert, secretive exercises that the American public may never know about. (Page 11)
2019 amendment just before COVID added ‘emerging threats’ to National Exercise Program law
There are U.S. federal laws which govern the “National Exercise Program.” Again, one of these laws was passed by congress in September 2019 and signed by the president on October 9, 2019. The update in question is the following short but extremely significant section:
SEC. 3. EMERGING THREATS IN THE NATIONAL EXERCISE PROGRAM.
Clause (i) of section 648(b)(2)(A) of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 748(b)(2)) is amended by inserting “and emerging” after “credible”. (133 STAT. 1123)
The entire law cannot be provided here, but with the October 2019 amendment emphasized the law now reads as follows:
(b) National exercise program
(1) In general
Beginning not later than 180 days after October 4, 2006, the Administrator [of FEMA], in coordination with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, the National Council on Disability, and the National Advisory Council, shall carry out a national exercise program to test and evaluate the national preparedness goal, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies.
The national exercise program—
(A) shall be—
(i) as realistic as practicable, based on current risk assessments, including credible and emerging threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences, and designed to stress the national preparedness system;
(ii) designed, as practicable, to simulate the partial or complete incapacitation of a State, local, or tribal government;
(iii) carried out, as appropriate, with a minimum degree of notice to involved parties regarding the timing and details of such exercises, consistent with safety considerations [etc.] (6 U.S. Code § 748ff)
The law originally only used the words “credible threats” but was updated soon before COVID-19 to read “credible and emerging threats.” It may not seem like it at first, but this may be very significant. The original law had not been amended since 2007 but was amended in 2019, only a few months before the reported outbreak of an “emerging infectious disease threat” known as COVID-19.
It is necessary to keep in mind, also, that the original law requires the Administrator of FEMA “in coordination with the heads of appropriate federal agencies” to “carry out a national exercise program to test and evaluate the national preparedness goal, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies.”
Strategies that may be “tested and evaluated” through the National Exercise Program may be the U.S. federal government’s plans and strategies to prepare for and protect against emerging infectious diseases and pandemics. Two of these strategies are the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response [ASPR] Strategic Plan for 2020-2023 (henceforth abbreviated as ASPR Strategic Plan 2020-2023).
Was 2019 amendment legal preparation for ‘infectious disease’ exercise?
There does not seem to be any logical reason for the law which originally only included “credible threats” to be updated in 2019 by adding the words “and emerging” to describe threats in U.S. federal laws governing the National Exercise Program – unless U.S. federal bureaus and departments were planning on convening a “National Exercise Program” or “National Level Exercise” involving what is described in other U.S. federal government laws, strategies, or plans as “emerging threats.”
The October 2019 amendment may be an attempt to provide more legal protection for those U.S. federal government officials who may have been planning to conduct or perform a National Exercise Program involving such an “emerging threat.”
In other words, there is not an obvious logical reason, but there may be an obvious legal reason: whereas the original word “credible” clearly refers to threats posed by the plans of human beings, adding “emerging threats” matches language used in other laws, plans, and strategies to describe infectious disease causing viruses like coronaviruses.
This may be one of the most clear suggestions that U.S. federal government national security officials, politicians, and/or public health officials were potentially attempting to cover themselves legally in preparation for what may have been at that time a planned “National Level Exercise” or “National Exercise Program” involving an “emerging threat.”
Those who have been studying U.S. federal government pandemic laws, plans, and strategies probably see the significance of, only a few months before COVID-19, adding “emerging” to describe “threats” in U.S. federal laws which govern the National Exercise Program.
The significance is that the phrase “emerging infectious diseases” is one of the more commonly used phrases in U.S. federal laws, plans, and strategies to describe “public health threats to national security.”
For example: the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 (a document required by law; see S. 1379—2 – S. 1379—3) describes “emerging infectious diseases that could lead to a pandemic,” one of the National Health Security Strategy’s objectives is to “protect the nation from the health effects of emerging and pandemic infectious diseases,” and the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 describes the U.S. federal government’s plans to “expedite the development and availability” of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, against “emerging infectious threats.” (Pages 1, 2, and 15, emphasis added)
Again, the “National Exercise Program” may be used to evaluate a strategy such as the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022; thus, the 2019 amendment to the National Exercise Program law to match language used to describe “emerging infectious threats” may be a major indicator of potential plans to convene an exercise involving “emerging infectious threats.”
Another example is the ASPR Strategic Plan 2020-2023, which states that
ASPR’s all-hazards approach to mission readiness and execution must account for the broad range of threats and hazards the nation has traditionally faced. ASPR also must prepare for new challenges presented by … rapidly spreading emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) and pandemics … The vast scope and shifting nature of these various threats and hazards call for continuous assessment of realistic scenarios to inform ASPR’s preparedness and response activities and investments. (Pages 9 – 10, emphasis added)
Thus, another major U.S. public health strategy discusses “emerging infectious diseases and pandemics” as threats. And this fact is also relevant but cannot be completely elaborated on: the ASPR has the legal authority to “carry out drills and operational exercises” in consultation with other U.S. federal bureaus and departments. (42 U.S. Code § 300hh–10ff) Some of those exercises may occur “without notice.” (42 U.S. Code § 300hh–1(b)(1)(A))
There are several other examples which will not be provided here. The significance of U.S. federal government’s “National Exercise Program” being updated only a few months before the reported COVID-19 outbreak to include the word “emerging” cannot be overstated: it strongly suggests the possibility that U.S. federal government officials may have been attempting to legally cover themselves for an upcoming “National Exercise” involving an “emerging threat” – that is, an “emerging-infectious-disease-that-could-lead-to-a-pandemic” threat.
It's official: Joe Biden has announced that his Administration will be forcing COVID vaccinations on nearly 1/3rd of American citizens, blatantly disregarding the personal objections of millions of people and moving America ever closer towards a medical dictatorship.
We cannot stand for this unprecedented overreach, and we will not submit to Biden's tyrannical public coercion efforts.
Please SIGN this urgent petition informing the President that you will NOT comply with these unconstitutional vaccine mandate orders issued by the Biden Administration, and that elected officials should act in their capacity to block these intrusive demands.
On Thursday, September 9th, Joe Biden announced the latest round of federal orders meant to further coerce large swaths of the public into getting the COVID vaccine -- many against their will.
While the legal standing of these measures is, at best, dubious, the Biden Administration appears more ready than ever to gut our individual rights and practically erase medical autonomy in our country.
This latest escalation in overreach was announced via a televised speech in which Biden outlined a new "six-point plan" that includes far more than just six avenues to achieve mass medical compliance.
Among the most egregious new federal mandates are the following:
- A requirement that all private businesses employing more than 100 people mandate their workers get the Covid-19 vaccine or submit to weekly testing (to be implemented by way of a new Department of Labor rule)
- A requirement that all federal employees and federal contractors get the COVID vaccine
- A requirement that all healthcare workers in facilities that receive reimbursement from Medicare and/or Medicaid (an estimated 17 million) get the Covid-19 vaccine without an alternative testing option
- A requirement that all Head Start teachers get the COVID vaccine
- A federal effort to lobby states to implement vaccine mandates for all school employees, and require regular testing of all students and school staff
- A federal effort to lobby entertainment venues to require proof of vaccination or testing in order to grant entry to the public
- A continuation of mask mandates on all federal properties and during interstate travel (i.e. planes, trains, buses)
All in all, these new vaccine mandates, which will go into effect within the coming weeks, will affect an estimated 100 million American workers -- 2/3rds of the entire workforce!
And, according to an administration official, violations of these unconstitutional requirements could result in fines of up to $14,000.
While this is clearly a political ploy on the part of the Joe Biden and his team of power-hungry Washington insiders to shift the focus from their disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, the American public knows better: After nearly a year and a half's worth of arbitrary, ever-changing, and unconstitutional government mandates in response to the COVID outbreak, it was always a given that the Biden Administration would ramp things up even further when it behooved them.
And now, it would seem that time has officially come.
"This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden uttered in his remarks, confirming his administration's blatant dismissal of all Americans' right(s) to accept or decline the experimental Covid-19 vaccine.
This is a stunning reversal from Biden's declaration last December that "I don’t think [the vaccine] should be mandatory, I wouldn’t demand it to be mandatory."
In fact, Biden even confirmed his intention to flout states' rights in the process, warning that "If these governors won’t help us beat the pandemic I’ll use my power as president to get them out of the way."
These are not the words of an "empathetic" leader; these are the words of an aspiring dictator. And, for the time being, the only way to stop Joe Biden's tyranny is through mass noncompliance.
As we've said from the beginning, science, basic logic, and common sense should dictate policy regarding COVID and the Delta variant.
But Joe Biden and the federal government have long abandoned those principles throughout this crisis, culminating into this disturbing yet inevitable flurry of intrusive vaccine mandates that use people's jobs, individual autonomy, and livelihood as leverage.
This assault on our individual rights, private businesses, and American workers cannot be tolerated, and the easiest way to combat these unlawful orders is to just say NO.
Please SIGN and SHARE this most important petition letting Joe Biden know that you will NOT comply with the unconstitutional medical demands being made by this administration, and that action should be taken to block any intrusive action against working Americans and private employers.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Biden announces vaccine requirements for private businesses, impacting tens of millions of Americans': https://www.
NEP amendment may be most significant indication of falsified pandemic
In other words, U.S. federal government officials putting in significant effort to ensure that the wording “and emerging” was added to “threats” and codified in U.S. federal laws governing the National Exercise Program suggests the possibility that a major national level exercise which may otherwise be illegal due to its potentially significantly damaging effects – and therefore result in legal action against U.S. federal national security officials, public health officials, and/or politicians – may have been planned.
Both the timing of this legal update (October 2019, only a few months before COVID-19) and the oddity of the update itself (adding simply “and emerging” to describe “threats” suggests U.S. federal government national security and public health officials were legally preparing for future planned national exercises involving “emerging threats,” planned exercises which could result in legal liability without the October 2019 amendment to the National Exercise Program law) make this one of the most significant indications that COVID-19 may be a falsified pandemic “National” (and International) “Exercise.”
It is probably good to leave open the possibility that the 2019 amendment to laws governing the National Exercise Program is (yet another) one of the most significant coincidences in history. Even so, Americans – especially those who received the COVID-19 vaccines – should be made aware of this significant 2019 legal action taken by the U.S. federal government only a few months before the reported outbreak of COVID-19.