Featured Image
UNICEF mission against tetanus in the Democratic Republic of Congo, September 2008Valeriya Anufriyeva/Shutterstock

Help Amanda recover from her vax injuries: LifeFunder

AUSTIN, Texas (LifeSiteNews) — Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has collaborated with British filmmaker and activist Dr. Andy Wakefield and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to deliver a new film that sets out to prove the World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in a “population control experiment” “carried out under the guise of a vaccination program” and resulted “in the sterilization of women in Africa without their knowledge or consent.”

According to a press release issued by CHD, the 30-minute film entitled ​​”Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda,” will premiere on Friday, June 10 at 2 p.m. ET on CHD.TV, followed by a special roundtable discussion with Wakefield, Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Jim Thorp, Dr. Brian Hooker, and Dr. Liz Mumper.

Guests are slated to “discuss the dramatic rise in infertility issues across the globe.”

RELATED: Thousands of reports of menstrual irregularities, reproductive dysfunction following COVID vaccines

“It is with timely irony that the World Health Organization reveals its true colors as it makes a desperate grab for control of global health,” said Wakefield, the film’s director, in the press release shared with LifeSiteNews.

“This story is a true ‘WHO’ dunnit,” he quipped.

According to CHD, the new film will “reveal the truth behind WHO’s nefarious collaboration with the Kenyan government in which an experimental tetanus vaccination, later found to be laced with the pregnancy hormone βhCG, was given to millions of unknowing African women of childbearing age.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
101114 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

Pro-life groups and Catholic leaders have long worried that WHO-sponsored tetanus vaccine programs, especially those which specifically target women in their childbearing years, could be used as an avenue for sterilization.

In the early 1990s, suspicion about global tetanus programs had led American pro-life organization Human Life International to call for a congressional investigation into the tetanus vaccine program underway in Mexico, arguing the drugs could render vaccinated women infertile.

In 2014, the Catholic Bishops of Kenya and the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association expressed concern that a tetanus vaccine sponsored by the WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) was “laced with a hormone that causes miscarriages and infertility,” CNS news reported at the time.

According to the bishops, multiple independent tests of the shots indicated the hormone was present in the injections, leading them to suggest the vaccination campaign was a “disguised population control program.”

READ: Kenyan bishops fear tetanus vaccine campaign is aimed to sterilize women

An 2017 open access study noted that as far back as 1976, researchers had reportedly “conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a ‘birth-control’ vaccine.”

The New York Times reported at the time that the shots would trick the immune system “into producing antibodies to both the tetanus protein and the H.C.G.,” thereby working to “​​block the action of a hormone that is essential to the life of a newly formed embryo.”

According to Dr. Sheldon Segal of the Population Council, the vaccine “would be ‘a tremendous advantage,’ particularly to the women of the developing world, where people are accustomed to injections and to the fact that injections can do good.”

By 1993, several birth-control vaccines for “family planning” were being developed.

In the 2017 study highlighting the WHO’s prior research, publications by the organization “show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable, ‘less developed countries.’”

UNICEF and the WHO have repeatedly denied the claims the tetanus vaccines used in global vaccination campaigns have contributed to miscarriages or infertility.

However, according to the CHD press release, the film “Infertility” will bring new evidence to light.

“The truths exposed in this film cast a long shadow from a tetanus trial in Africa to the symptoms of infertility that are happening all over the world, including reports after the Gardasil vaccine and the COVID shots,” CHD chief science director Dr. Brian Hooker said.

Likewise, CHD president and general counsel Mary Holland stated that the movie “documents evidence that strongly supports the idea that the WHO was conducting an experiment on women of childbearing age to make them infertile without informed consent.”

“The film highlights whether the global community should vastly empower the WHO to regulate and enforce global health policy,” Holland said.

Kennedy, the executive producer who has repeatedly spoken out against forced COVID-19 shots, pointed out that “[a]n abiding principle of ethical medical practice is that every patient has the right to fully informed, voluntary consent.”

“We expose the WHO’s gross violation of this principle in its surreptitious campaign to prevent and abort pregnancies in millions of unsuspecting African women,” Kennedy said, arguing that the “WHO led these women to believe that they were part of a public health program to protect their newborn babies.”

“This is a timely message that the WHO is not fit, on any level, to dictate global health policy,” he said.

Help Amanda recover from her vax injuries: LifeFunder


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.