News
Featured Image
New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

(Live Action) – The Governor of New Mexico has signed an executive order directing the Department of Finance and Administration to designate $10 million for a state-funded abortion facility.

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s order, signed alongside the New Mexico Commission on the Status of Women and state legislators, also directs the state Department of Health (DOH) to “leverage State resources to expand access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion in underserved areas of the state.” In addition, the order directs DOH to “access the feasibility” of providing the abortion pill in public facilities the DOH oversees.

“The executive order designates $10 million of the governor’s capital outlay funds for the development of a reproductive health care clinic in Doña Ana County, aimed at fortifying and expanding New Mexicans’ access to the full spectrum of reproductive health care, including regular preventative care, family planning, prenatal care, labor and delivery, postpartum care and support, lactation counseling and support, abortion, and appropriate medical management of miscarriage and pregnancy loss,” the Governor’s press release states.

“The executive order also directs the Department of Health to develop a detailed plan to leverage resources to expand abortion access in rural and underserved parts of the state, work to make abortion medications available in state public health clinics, and to reduce wait times and increase access statewide.”

“Finally, the order directs the Human Services Department to implement policies that improve that efficiency and sustainability of reproductive health care access in New Mexico,” the release adds.

C/O: Live action

The Albuquerque Journal reported that the abortion facility would be built “in Doña Ana County – likely in or around Las Cruces” and would come from “infrastructure funding allocated annually by the governor.” The paper also stated, “The governor’s infrastructure funding is typically folded into a larger capital outlay bill that’s voted on by lawmakers, who also insert hundreds of their own projects. Given that background, the pledged funding could be largely contingent on the outcome of the November general election.”

The Las Cruces Sun reported similarly, writing, “The discretionary funds will come from appropriations during New Mexico’s 2023 legislative session which will open January 17. The governor said as yet no location or fiscal agent to handle the funds had been selected for the clinic as yet.”

New Mexico State Senator David Gallegos called the move “really tragic” and claimed it would cause the state to be known as “the abortion capital of the world.” In an emergency webcast with pro-life leaders, the senator suggested that pro-lifers concerned about the move need to contact their state legislatures.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Nancy Pelosi she's wrong about abortion restrictions - killing babies is sinful
  Show Petition Text
1278 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's flippant disregard for the unborn has reached a new low amid her unfounded claims about abortion restrictions — all while claiming to be a Catholic.

Now, Speaker Pelosi has ventured into the absurd, ironically labelling the pro-life movement's goal of restricting abortions and saving the unborn as "sinful." 

LifeSiteNews reported the full event that brought about her comments:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has once again criticized the pro-life movement, calling its efforts to save unborn babies “sinful.” 

Pelosi made the remarks during a “roundtable discussion,” which took place at the University of California in San Francisco to mark “Women’s Equality Day” last Friday. 

“The fact that this is such an assault [sic] on women of color and…lower income families is just sinful. It’s sinful,” Pelosi said about abortion restrictions. 

Speaker Pelosi's moral compass has been inverted, accusing the pro-life movement an offense to God.

It is "sinful," according to Pelosi, that we defend life in the womb. 

It is "sinful," according to Pelosi, that we protect young, vulnerable, and desperate women from the pain and remorse that follows abortion.

It is "sinful," according to Pelosi, that we protect the least among us — the unborn — by finally abolishing the abortion industry.

Pelosi is completely backwards, having clearly lost sight of the truly sinful and horrendous act of abortion. 

Send a clear message to Speaker Nancy Pelosi: Catholics demand an apology for her perverse comments calling the pro-life movement's goal of abolishing abortion "sinful."

SIGN OUR PETITION DEMANDING A FULL APOLOGY NOW.

"We the undersigned demand a public apology, and await your public retraction of such a wild accusation."

P.S. — Nancy Pelosi has gotten away with using her faith as a shield for the most terrible leftwing policies, including abortion. By raising your voice with us, we will send a clear message that she can no longer use Christianity as cover for her disgusting far-left plans!

  Hide Petition Text

Local pro-life activists respond

Pro-lifers in New Mexico were outraged, claiming that since Texas’s trigger ban outlawing most abortions took effect in late August and New Mexico is one of the closest states where the industry is directing women to travel for abortion, that their taxpayer funding is actually going to assist Texas women with abortion – not women in New Mexico.

Mike Seibel, senior counsel for Abortion on Trial, claimed in a webcast that “New Mexicans don’t want abortion. We have one of the lowest in-state abortion rates in the country and it’s at about seven percent.”

“We have less than 3,000 abortions in the country,” he also stated. “This is a complete diversion to provide New Mexico as Texas’s back-alley abortion clinic.”

Between 2017 and 2018, Seibel claimed the state’s Medicaid statistics showed that about 80 percent of abortions occurred in Albuquerque, with only around 200 occurring in Doña Ana County. “So we’re spending $10 million for two to three hundred New Mexico residents to ‘have access’” to abortion, Seibel claimed.

Mark Cavaliere, director of Southwest Coalition for Life, pointed out that the move “is coming right after we’ve seen already an influx in Las Cruces going from no abortion providers a year ago to now – this is going to be four?” Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the abortion facility plaintiff in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court case that led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, is relocating to Las Cruces, as are Planned Parenthood and others, Cavaliere pointed out. “And if that’s not enough, now we have the New Mexico Governor directing taxpayer money – $10 million – to a[n] abortion center in New Mexico.”

Seibel said that given the history regarding poor standard of care by New Mexico abortion providers, it is likely women will get injured. “Our abortion industry here in New Mexico has a horrible track record being unregulated and unsafe,” he said. “We are becoming a culture of death for the United States, they are shipping them here in droves.”

According to Seibel, the move means that, “Not only [are] your tax dollars going to go out there but we’re going to see a healthcare crisis,” he said. “We already have a shortage of nurses and physicians in the state of New Mexico due to the COVID restrictions and people moving out-of-state… and we’re going to continue to tax our healthcare system. Additionally, it will be more women in the emergency rooms here in New Mexico just with the abortion pill alone.”

Dominique Davis, Project Defending Life’s executive director, called the move “misguided” and pointed out that a rural area recently had to close a maternity ward due to a lack of providers. “So, why are we not putting money to things like this?” she asked. Davis suggested that the money would be better spent supporting maternal or prenatal care, which, when lacking, “might drive a woman to make an abortion decision,” she said. “We clearly have other needs here that are very important and critical for New Mexican families – men, women, children, the unborn child.”

Senator Gallegos believes funding abortion over the needs of New Mexican citizens is irresponsible. “You know we have veterans’ needs; we have homeless needs; we have mental health needs in this area in our state. But if you want to put something somewhere and you say you care, then why not put this toward the pregnancy centers and the maternity homes?”

“There’s a lot of need in New Mexico, and to start a new abortion clinic for our state-run abortion clinic here in New Mexico… it’s for Texas residents,” he added. “We aren’t Texas, and why are our tax monies funding something that they want?”

Cavaliere urged pro-lifers to pray, fast, and take part in sidewalk advocacy in the upcoming days. “We’ve got to get our knees on the ground, get out on the sidewalk, to be that peaceful witness,” he stated.

Reprinted with permission from Live Action.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...