News

WASHINGTON, May 15, 2001 (LSN.ca) – American Life League (ALL) has reacted to the announcement of a new so-called contraceptive patch which a recent Canadian-led study has said is as “good” as the birth control pill. According to the scientific write-up on the patch it uses estrogen and progestin which act in several ways, one of which is to hamper implantation of the embryo in the uterine lining. ALL President Judie Brown notes “That’s abortion. It kills a living human being in his earliest stages of development.”

The principal author of the Canada-U.S. study was Marie-Claire Audet of the Centre Médical des Halles de Ste-Foy in the Quebec City area. It is written up in the May 9 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association and was funded by U.S. drug giant Johnson & Johnson.

Brown decried the contraceptive mentality that views pregnancy as a malady to be avoided at all costs, and fertility as a condition in need of a cure. “Why do we want to mindlessly medicate millions of perfectly healthy women?” she asked. Pro-abortion groups are demanding quick Food and Drug Administration approval of this patch, “as if it were as benign as a Band-Aid,” she said. “This patch may not irritate skin, but it can destroy flesh and blood in the form of an already-conceived human person.”

See the Globe and Mail coverage: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/gam/National/20010509/UPATCMSB.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.