Featured Image

LONDON (LifeSiteNews) — British government ministers have included recommendations to criminalize those who publish “knowingly false information” as part of the proposed Online Safety Bill, with those convicted facing two years in prison.

A slew of new offenses was recommended to be added to the U.K.’s draft Online Safety Bill by the Law Commission — an independent British legal body made up of judges, solicitors, and barristers who advise reform periodically — and is expected to be raised in Parliament on December 10, when the bill officially begins its journey through Britain’s legislature.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport embraced the Law Commission’s recommendation “for crimes to be based on ‘likely psychological harm,’” The Times reported, creating new offenses related to “threatening communications” and “false communications.”

The intended focus of the revised offenses is purportedly to place less emphasis on the “content of a communication,” centering rather on its “potentially harmful effects.” This represents a significant broadening of the current standard of criminal assessment, which is based on whether a communication is “grossly offensive or indecent.”

“We believe this will more effectively protect freedom of expression and avoid over-criminalisation while better targeting the myriad types of harmful communications,” the Law Commission wrote.

Accordingly, the government will consider whether to criminalize the publication of a “knowingly false communication,” described as sending or posting a message which is “intended to cause non-trivial emotional, psychological or physical harm to a likely audience.” According to The Times, a government insider suggested that “false information” around vaccines could be prosecuted.

In addition, the proposal suggests an offense against “pile-on harassment,” by which individuals who join in sending messages deemed harmful, though not initiating the supposed harassment, can be prosecuted.

Given that the government has altered its position on various aspects of the COVID-19 shots currently being rolled out en masse, earlier in the year championing the effectiveness of the jabs against the spread of COVID to then admitting that they do not prevent the spread thereof, implementing the legislation could prove problematic.

The Law Commission noted that the application of any “harm-based communications” or “knowingly false communications” offense should include an exemption for the press, focusing its attention on “public posts on social media sites like Twitter or Facebook, individual comments on such posts or below an online newspaper article.” The recommendation also applies to private “one-to-one messages.”

Conservative MP David Davis commented that the legislation would likely prove “catastrophic” for freedom of speech, telling Sky News that the bill represents “a good example of the best of intentions leading to the worst of outcomes.”

Characterizing the proposal as a “Censor’s Charter,” Davis highlighted the effects the bill would have on social media, essentially handing Big Tech carte blanche to remove posts regarded as contentious, especially since Ofcom, the communications regulator in Britain, would be able to impose fines stretching into billions of dollars.

“You can be sure that in any area of controversy — political issues, culture wars, or even COVID science — there will be plenty of people complaining and demanding a post be taken down,” Davis said.

“With Silicon Valley mega corporations as arbiters of the truth, anything that appears online and can be characterised by someone as misinformation could be censored … The chilling effect on free speech will be terrible.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Resist Biden's Vaccine Mandate
  Show Petition Text
28925 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 30000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

It's official: Joe Biden has announced that his Administration will be forcing COVID vaccinations on nearly 1/3rd of American citizens, blatantly disregarding the personal objections of millions of people and moving America ever closer towards a medical dictatorship.

We cannot stand for this unprecedented overreach, and we will not submit to Biden's tyrannical public coercion efforts.

Please SIGN this urgent petition informing the President that you will NOT comply with these unconstitutional vaccine mandate orders issued by the Biden Administration, and that elected officials should act in their capacity to block these intrusive demands.

On Thursday, September 9th, Joe Biden announced the latest round of federal orders meant to further coerce large swaths of the public into getting the COVID vaccine -- many against their will.

While the legal standing of these measures is, at best, dubious, the Biden Administration appears more ready than ever to gut our individual rights and practically erase medical autonomy in our country.

This latest escalation in overreach was announced via a televised speech in which Biden outlined a new "six-point plan" that includes far more than just six avenues to achieve mass medical compliance.

Among the most egregious new federal mandates are the following:

  • A requirement that all private businesses employing more than 100 people mandate their workers get the Covid-19 vaccine or submit to weekly testing (to be implemented by way of a new Department of Labor rule)
  • A requirement that all federal employees and federal contractors get the COVID vaccine
  • A requirement that all healthcare workers in facilities that receive reimbursement from Medicare and/or Medicaid (an estimated 17 million) get the Covid-19 vaccine without an alternative testing option
  • A requirement that all Head Start teachers get the COVID vaccine
  • A federal effort to lobby states to implement vaccine mandates for all school employees, and require regular testing of all students and school staff
  • A federal effort to lobby entertainment venues to require proof of vaccination or testing in order to grant entry to the public
  • A continuation of mask mandates on all federal properties and during interstate travel (i.e. planes, trains, buses)

All in all, these new vaccine mandates, which will go into effect within the coming weeks, will affect an estimated 100 million American workers -- 2/3rds of the entire workforce!

And, according to an administration official, violations of these unconstitutional requirements could result in fines of up to $14,000.

While this is clearly a political ploy on the part of the Joe Biden and his team of power-hungry Washington insiders to shift the focus from their disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, the American public knows better: After nearly a year and a half's worth of arbitrary, ever-changing, and unconstitutional government mandates in response to the COVID outbreak, it was always a given that the Biden Administration would ramp things up even further when it behooved them.

And now, it would seem that time has officially come.

"This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden uttered in his remarks, confirming his administration's blatant dismissal of all Americans' right(s) to accept or decline the experimental Covid-19 vaccine.

This is a stunning reversal from Biden's declaration last December that "I don’t think [the vaccine] should be mandatory, I wouldn’t demand it to be mandatory."

In fact, Biden even confirmed his intention to flout states' rights in the process, warning that "If these governors won’t help us beat the pandemic I’ll use my power as president to get them out of the way."

These are not the words of an "empathetic" leader; these are the words of an aspiring dictator. And, for the time being, the only way to stop Joe Biden's tyranny is through mass noncompliance.

As we've said from the beginning, science, basic logic, and common sense should dictate policy regarding COVID and the Delta variant.

But Joe Biden and the federal government have long abandoned those principles throughout this crisis, culminating into this disturbing yet inevitable flurry of intrusive vaccine mandates that use people's jobs, individual autonomy, and livelihood as leverage.

This assault on our individual rights, private businesses, and American workers cannot be tolerated, and the easiest way to combat these unlawful orders is to just say NO.

Please SIGN and SHARE this most important petition letting Joe Biden know that you will NOT comply with the unconstitutional medical demands being made by this administration, and that action should be taken to block any intrusive action against working Americans and private employers.

Thank you!


'Biden announces vaccine requirements for private businesses, impacting tens of millions of Americans':

  Hide Petition Text

The former cabinet member noted that “[l]obby groups will be able to push social networks to take down content they view as not politically correct, even though the content is legal.”

“The idea we should force Silicon Valley companies to police Briton’s speech online, seems out of Orwell’s 1984, and is not what our voters expect of us,” he added.

David Kurten, leader of the pro-family, pro-tradition Heritage Party, echoed Davis’ concerns, telling LifeSiteNews via email that the Online Safety Bill “will essentially put an end to free speech in the U.K.”

Regarding the inclusion of offenses against speech which cause “psychological harm” or are “knowingly false,” Kurten said that the terms are “ill-defined.” He noted that the definitions will “likely be decided by the army of diversity officers paid to defend wokery, and government agents who do not wish official narratives to be challenged.”

A government spokesman defended the bill, suggesting that the updated offenses are simply a way of “making our laws fit for the digital age.”

“Our comprehensive Online Safety Bill will make tech companies responsible for people’s safety and we are carefully considering the Law Commission’s recommendations on strengthening criminal offences,” he said.

Countering, Kurten explained that “the trouble with criminalising nebulous concepts like ‘psychological harm’ is that anybody can allege a criminal offence for just about anything.”

The homosexual and transgender lobby, he said, “could allege a crime against anyone defending the biological fact that there are two sexes.” In like manner, “Muslims could pursue criminal action against anyone they think has offended Muhammed, and anyone who is the butt of a comedian’s joke or a satire piece could press charges.”

“Even more insidiously, the government is likely to become the arbiter of what is ‘knowingly false information’ and will require police forces to lock people up for ‘spreading’ it.”

Kurten lamented the emergence of “misinformation” accusations, leveled against “citizens who have questioned the official COVID narratives” since the onset of the novel coronavirus, as well as those who have stated “the effectiveness of the natural human immune system in fighting SARS-CoV-2, the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, or pointed out the increasing number of severe adverse health events related to injections of experimental mRNA or genetically modified chimp virus, whose manufacturers have no liability.”

“If this Orwellian bill becomes an act,” Kurten said, “such citizens are likely to face criminal charges and prison sentences for speaking the truth. It should be binned before the U.K. turns into a totalitarian police state.”


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.