News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

(LifeSiteNews) — A young girl is barred from joining her father in New Zealand because she is autistic.

Arianna Alfonzo is a 12-year-old diagnosed with autism, The Guardian reported. She has lived in the Philippines with her mother, Lorigail Alfonzo, for the past six years. Her father, Allan Alfonzo, lives in New Zealand, where he owns a carpet-laying business.

Both parents are permanent residents of New Zealand and wish for their daughter to also live in New Zealand. However, Arianna applied for permanent residency in 2018 and was denied due to her autism.

Lorigail explained that Arianna was denied entry as she will “likely impose many costs and demands in New Zealand education.” New Zealand’s immigration policy refuses acceptance of new citizens whose disabilities exceed $41,000 over five years.

The family enlisted the aid of lawyers and specialists, spending thousands in their attempt to bring their daughter to New Zealand and prove she would not be a burden to the country.

“Like any other child, Arianna deserves to live with dignity and be treated fairly,” Lorigail said. “Arianna deserves to have a complete and happy family.” The family began a petition in the hope of reuniting their family.

New Zealand Green Party MP Ricardo Menéndez March advocated for the family, condemning the current system. “Disabled & neurodivergent migrants shouldn’t have to go through dehumanising processes of individual appeals to prove their humanity and have their human rights recognised,” he tweeted. “This is why we’re working with @endashnow + others to end the ableist acceptable standards of health policy.”

March reported that he knew of approximately 400 similar cases wherein people were denied entry due to medical conditions. Another case was Juliana Carvalho, who was denied entry because she has lupus and is paraplegic.

She fought the denial and eventually won, but said, “the emotional toll was worse than becoming paraplegic, in terms of mental health and suffering … This whole messaging that all you are [is] a burden, that you add no value – it has a huge impact on someone’s life.”

“I am a very resourceful person with amazing friends, family, I have the support, and for me it was almost unbearable,” Carvalho continued. “Now imagine for a child with a disability, who is building their identity – what is the impact of this messaging for children? And what is the impact of this messaging for all the other children with disabilities in this country?”

In 2021, after being allowed into New Zealand, she began a petition to overturn the current ruling. However, the court refused to review the law, claiming, “The current settings are not specifically discriminatory against disabled people, but instead focus on assessing the public health impact an individual will have,” said a government statement.

“The government values the contribution that disabled people bring to society and is always willing to take steps towards making New Zealand a non-disabling society,” it continued. “However, as this goal pertains to the current Acceptable Standard of Health (ASH) immigration settings, the government considers these settings appropriate.”

Recently, New Zealand has become increasingly totalitarian in the regulation of the health of its citizens. In 2021, New Zealand’s COVID-19 Response Minister confirmed that a “handful” of “severe” adverse reactions to the experimental Pfizer jab had been reported. <

However, in the same interview, he suggested that his government would need to “go out and find” any Kiwis who were still unvaccinated next year.

Additionally, in 2020, New Zealand established mandatory quarantine facilities for COVID-19 patients. This year, a pregnant journalist was denied re-entry into New Zealand because she was unvaccinated. This story is only one of many as New Zealand’s COVID-19 regulations have effectively imprisoned residents within their own country and barred thousands from returning home.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...