News

NEW YORK, March 14, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) – As if the March of Dimes (MOD) support of eugenics and abortions in cases of fetal abnormality were not enough, pro-lifers now have an additional reason not to give money to the MOD.  The Eliott Institute has pointed out that MOD has refused to admit that abortion is a major risk factor in low-birth weight of subsequent babies.  In announcing a major fund-raising effort, MOD claims a 27 percent rise in premature births “is a mystery.” Yet, points out the Eliott Institute’s Dr. David Reardon,  the organization should know that at least 48 published studies have shown a history of abortion places women at significantly higher risk of premature birth and low-birth-weight.  “March of Dimes is exploiting the “mysterious” rise in dangerous pre-term deliveries to raise hundreds of millions of dollars while concealing one of the primary causes of premature birth—a prior history of abortion,” says Reardon in a release.  He encourages the signing of a petition asking the MOD to admit the abortion link.  See Dr. Reardon’s MOD petition:  https://www.conservativepetitions.com/petitions/php?id=143

See evidence of MOD’s pro-eugenics:  MARCH OF DIMES BOYCOTT URGED https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/1998/jul/98070805.html   BIRTH DEFECT REPORTING LEGISLATION PROPOSED https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/feb/00020703.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.