Featured Image
 Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

(LifeSiteNews) — Catholic pro-life advocates formally asked the U.S. Supreme Court this month to recognize the personhood of unborn babies under the U.S. Constitution. The push to recognize fetal personhood has the potential to produce a nationwide abortion ban if the Court affirms that the unborn are persons with guaranteed rights. 

Catholics for Life filed the petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court on September 1, along with two expectant mothers representing their unborn babies referred to in the filing as Baby Doe and Baby Roe. 

In the 46-page document, the petitioners request that the Court recognize the “personhood” of unborn babies under the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, which ensures that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” 

RELATED: Science confirms that human life begins at fertilization

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Republican Senators: Defend natural marriage!
  Show Petition Text
8541 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

We need YOU to be a voice for natural marriage and the constitutional freedom of individual states by SIGNING and SHARING this petition calling on Republican U.S. Senators to oppose the deceitfully named "Respect for Marriage Act!"

Leftist members of Congress have, once again, opted to ignore the myriad of issues facing our country — be it the border crisis, gas prices, inflation, crime, and more — to instead virtue-signal by introducing their radical new bill, the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act," which, among other things, would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.

And with the radical left continuing its attempts to redefine words, people, and events to better suit their agenda and advance their political narratives, it should come as no surprise that their latest target happens to be natural marriage.

But marriage is not a political tool for the left to manipulate and destroy; it is the key building block of our society, and the primary basis for the safe, responsible upbringing of our children.

Republican members of the U.S. Senate still have a chance to defend natural marriage by stopping this bill from becoming law, but we need to let them know that the American people oppose the left's seemingly never-ending efforts to degrade the sanctity of marriage.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to Republican members of the U.S. Senate, insisting that they vote against the "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for any form of vote.

The legislation in question, formally filed as H.R.8404 and sponsored by liberal New York Congressman Jerry Nadler, would codify same-sex marriage into federal law, effectively forcing states to recognize any marriage performed in another state regardless of laws on their own books.

It would also fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was signed by President Clinton back in 1996 and formally defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman under federal law.

With the fall of Roe v. Wade back in June, the left's paranoia about losing ground when it comes to their radical social and political agenda has reached a fever pitch, resulting in the ongoing push for the "Respect for Marriage Act," which, if we don't act soon, may well become law...

TIME IS RUNNING OUT: With a 50-50 Senate, the left needs just TEN Republican members to bow to pressure: the mainstream media, Big Tech, Hollywood, and the university system are all fighting against us. With so much pressure against conservatives, we need you to send these Senators a powerful message demanding that they stand strong against the left.

That's why we need your help now.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to Republican U.S. Senators across the country, urging them to stand against the left's attempts to reinvent marriage by opposing the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for a vote.

Protect natural marriage! Protect the freedoms of individual states!

Put Republican U.S. Senators on notice and let them know that you're watching closely how they vote on the "Respect for Marriage Act."

Thank you!


  Hide Petition Text

The filing specifically challenges Rhode Island’s 2019 codification of Roe v. Wade and attendant rollback of an 1861 law affirming that unborn babies meet the legal definition of “personhood.”

According to the petition, Rhode Island’s 2019 Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which codified the “right to abortion” as defined in Roe v. Wade (1973), had “stripped Petitioners, Baby Mary Doe and Baby Roe, of their ‘personhood’” by repealing “Rhode Island General Laws § 11-3-4.” 

The General Laws authorized the criminalization of abortion for 158 years until 2019. According to the since-repealed legislation, “human life commences at the instant of conception,” and an unborn baby is “a person within the language and meaning of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States.”

RELATED: Rhode Island’s Catholic governor signs extreme pro-abortion law

Now the U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to decide whether Rhode Island had “erred” in repealing the pro-life law in light of the Court’s landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in June, which overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).

The petitioners argue that the Court “avoided the question of ‘when prenatal life is entitled to any rights enjoyed after birth’” when it handed down its decision in Dobbs, adding that their filing  “presents the opportunity for this Court to meet that inevitable question head on.”

According to the pro-lifers, the Court’s decision to declare Roe v. Wade “egregiously wrong from the start” and reverse Roe and Casey “surely signal rejection” of the prior determination in Roe that “the word ‘person,’ as used in the Fourteenth Amendment, does not include the unborn.”

RELATED: While the Supreme Court should be praised for overturning Roe, it didn’t go far enough

The authors of the petition say they aren’t asking “this Court to adopt any particular ‘theory of life”. 

However, they request that the Court “identify the guarantees upon which Petitioners – and any unborn plaintiff regardless of gestational age – can rely for constitutional protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, and whether unborn human beings will categorically be denied access to the courts to challenge an abortion law.”

The petitioners state that their questions “are pointed and inevitable, in light of Dobbs,” and that the filing“ presents all that is necessary to resolve the unfinished business left by Dobbs.”

“Now is the time,” the pro-lifers argue.

If the Court chooses not to grant the request, the petitioners alternatively ask that the justices “vacate the ruling of the Rhode Island Supreme Court and remand the case for further proceedings in light of this Court’s decision of Dobbs v. Jackson – with specific guidance as to the analysis courts should take in this instance.”

It remains to be seen what success the petitioners will achieve. They previously failed to obtain a lower court injunction against Rhode Island’s codification of abortion, and have been stymied in attempts to appeal to higher courts, The Washington Examiner reported. 

In May, the Rhode Island Supreme Court wrote that “the unborn plaintiffs fail to assert a legally cognizable and protected interest as persons pursuant to these repealed statutes, which are contrary to the United States Constitution as construed by the United States Supreme Court.”

As the petitioners note in their filing, however, the U.S. Supreme Court’s June decision rolling back Roe v. Wade could put them in a stronger position than they faced in May. 

At least four Supreme Court justices will need to grant their approval for hearing the case before it can be taken up.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.