News
Featured Image
 Piotr Swat / Shutterstock.com

ANALYSIS

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – In the wake of a possible Roe reversal, taxpayer-subsidized National Public Radio (NPR) is out with a misleading fact-check of “7 persistent claims about abortion” and the 1973 court decision. The fact-check misleads on the nature of Roe v. Wade, misdirects on the issue, downplays the dangers of abortion, and uses a non-sequitur about religion to advance the pro-abortion narrative.

First, NPR correctly notes that Roe “ruled that women have a constitutional right to end their pregnancies,” though it should have noted that the “health of the mother” exception has been exploited to allow for abortions through all nine months of pregnancy.

But then the first “fact-checked” claim attempts to debunk the argument that “[t]here is big support for ending Roe.” But the NPR fact-checkers do not cite polls that ask if people want abortion returned to the states, which would be the result of reversing Roe. Instead, they cite polls on whether Americans want abortion to be illegal or not and in which cases.

Yet, as recently noted by LifeSiteNews, polls have consistently found that Americans want the ability to vote and voice their opinion on abortion, an ability Roe took away. A 2019 poll of millennials conducted by Students for Life of America (SFLA) found that 65 percent of that age group wants to be able to vote on abortion policy and only 16 percent said the courts should limit the public’s say on the issue. A Knights of Columbus poll from 2019 reached similar conclusions.

READ: Wisconsin pro-life group headquarters firebombed and vandalized on Mother’s Day

Second, NPR reported that the abortion rate has decreased since Roe v. Wade. That may or may not be true, because we do not have a federal abortion reporting law.

But taking the claim about the rate to be true, it’s still a misdirection on the issue – every year, hundreds of thousands, if not a million, innocent human babies are killed through abortion in the United States. The particular rate for women aged 15-44 is irrelevant to the central, moral issue: Should the United States let women kill babies in the womb or not?

This is part of the issue with the claim about abortion being safe that NPR also makes. By definition, a “successful” abortion automatically ends in at least one death. Abortion has also been linked to possible increases in breast cancer diagnoses and mental health issues. SFLA has also identified 122 studies that link abortion to future risks for preterm births.

NPR then relies on fuzzy math, using two different standards depending on what point it is trying to make. In the one claim, NPR says that it’s not just heterosexual, “cisgender women” who have abortions, but also “transgender or non-binary people.” It notes that 500 gender-confused women have had abortions. It does not really matter to the pro-life movement who has abortions, insofar as every abortion takes a human life. So, it’s not clear the point NPR is trying to make here – pro-lifers don’t want any woman to have abortions.

Second, these 500 women are apparently a significant stat for NPR, despite it being on the backdrop of at least 609,000 abortions in 2017, the year both data points are drawn from. This represents .08 percent of abortion cases. But in the next claim, NPR “fact-checks” the claims that women are having abortions late in pregnancy, by noting that only 10 percent of abortions are after the first trimester. The news site does not explain how 10 percent is an insignificant number but .08 percent is significant.

— Article continues below Petition —
Supreme Court: Publish decision to overturn Roe now!
  Show Petition Text
16041 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 17500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

SIGN this petition urging the Chief Justice and all the Associate Justices to PUBLISH the decision to overturn Roe now!

Don't allow pro-abortion leftists to pressure Supreme Court justices to change their vote to overturn Roe!

According to an initial leaked draft majority opinion allegedly written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico, the U.S. Supreme Court has voted to overturn its nearly 50-year-old Roe v. Wade decision, which imposed abortion on demand across the country.

As reported by Politico, the opinion is “a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision."

Of course, if this decision holds, this would be the best news in decades, thanks be to God!

However, leftists in Washington and in the media will stop at nothing to prevent Roe from being overturned.

But, intimidation and threats cannot be permitted to influence the Court, especially on this most fundamental human rights ruling.

That's why - right now - it's essential to urge the High Court to PUBLISH the ruling which overturns Roe.

SIGN this petition urging the Chief Justice and all the Associate Justices to PUBLISH the decision to overturn Roe now!

The leak of a drafted opinion is unprecedented in Supreme Court history and is sending shockwaves through the legal world.

Rumors are swirling about who could've leaked this seminal ruling, and what Chief Justice Roberts and the FBI will do about it.

But, this is a distraction from the real news which is that the Supreme Court is on the verge of righting one of the worst legal decisions ever made in the United States.

Over 60 million babies have been killed in the U.S. since the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, a colossal evil that has been allowed to stand for too long.

That's why we need to tell the Members of the U.S. Supreme Court to stand strong and PUBLISH THE RULING NOW!

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Is the leaked Roe v. Wade reversal opinion an attempt by the Left to pressure justices?' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/analysis-is-the-leaked-roe-reversal-opinion-an-attempt-by-the-left-to-pressure-justices

'Alleged leaked majority opinion shows Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-scotus-roe-leaked

'Pro-abortion protesters gather outside Supreme Court after reported ruling overturning Roe v. Wade' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-abortion-demonstrators-gather-outside-supreme-court-after-reported-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade/

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

NPR then uses a 2005 study on fetal pain to allegedly debunk that babies can feel pain. LifeSiteNews has compiled a list of research that proves babies can feel pain during abortions.

Finally, the NPR fact-checkers say that plenty of women who are religious have abortions. There’s some truth here and some falsehoods. Women who identify with a religious denomination may be having abortions – many “religions” endorse abortion, such as the United Church of Christ and liberal Jewish sects.

Second, people may identify as Catholic, but not attend Mass, go to Confession, or in any other way live out the faith. Third, it’s a non-sequitur, the same as the earlier claim about gender-confused women having abortions. The debate is whether or not women should be allowed to kill babies in the womb, not if this Protestant sect says abortion is okay or if this one does not.

“The argument against abortion has frequently been based on religion,” the article stated, to explain why it brought up abortion rates. This is the nature of sin, that people who are Catholic, for example, have abortions despite the Church’s prohibition against it. There are Catholics who have viewed pornography, consumed drugs, and used prostitutes. None of those moral failings on behalf of those individual Catholics justify an acceptance of those practices, nor does the sad reality that women have abortions despite being Catholic justify the legalization of them.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...