(LifeSiteNews) – A shocking number of elderly citizens died in the first wave of COVID, and not always from the virus but from severe malnutrition and dehydration, and by protocols that used euthanasia drugs and “end-of -life pathways” as a first-line of treatment for any symptoms, according to a recent analysis published in the C2C Journal. Of all countries in the west, Canada was the deadliest place to be an at-risk long-term care home resident.
“At the end of May 2020, Canada was reporting that 81 percent of the country’s Covid-19 deaths took place in LTCFs [long-term care facilities],” writes Anna Farrow, executive director of the English-Speaking Catholic Council in the province of Quebec. “This compared to an average of 38 percent in the other 37 OECD countries. That proportion has fallen, but a December 2021 report by the Canadian Institute for Health Information noted that LTCFs still accounted for 43 percent of Covid-19 deaths.”
That’s remarkably high considering that governments enforced stringent pandemic lockdown strategies and other COVID measures to protect the elderly and vulnerable. Why did they fail?
What killed Gran?
The Don’t Kill Granny campaign first emerged in England, in August 2020, when the city of Preston used it to augments its policy preventing mixing of households, writes Farrow. “‘Don’t kill your gran’ was quickly adopted by the U.K.’s then health minister, Matt Hancock, and used to encourage young people to limit their social interactions.”
So, then, why did the elderly die in such vast numbers especially in Canada, she asks. “What did kill Gran?”
We know that in the spring of 2020, nursing homes, where staff were already in short supply and overworked in Canada, care staff jumped ship in unprecedented numbers. Why stay and be overworked and underpaid in miserable conditions when there was supposed risk of catching a deadly infection?
“To make matters worse, lockdown policies barred family caregivers and close friends, who often provided daily support to their loved ones, from the facilities,” writes Farrow. “And not just physically, for family members often spent weeks unable even to contact their loved ones or staff.”
Starved and dehydrated
Canadians heard about it when the military were sent into elderly care homes in late April 2020. “To read Brigadier General C.J.J. Mialkowski’s report about the Ontario homes is to read a document that conveys in the precise, meticulous language of a soldier the horror the military personnel felt. It reads as dispatches from a new kind of battlefield,” Farrow sates.
“There were common themes across the five facilities: lack of permanent, trained, and coordinated staff; misuse of narcotics; shortage of supplies; inadequate nutrition and hydration of residents.”
A similar tragedy unfolded in Spain, where military were sent into care homes to find elderly patients dead and abandoned in their beds.
And there were also the tragedies of “superspreader events” at New York nursing homes, facilitated by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, when 9,056 COVID-infected patients were transferred into the facilities, leading to some 15,000 deaths.
Lethal treatment protocols
Apart from the fact that many elderly people who died in nursing homes in the first wave of the COVID pandemic were actually starved and deprived of water to death, there were protocols put in place, apparently in other countries as well as Canada, to simply administer cocktails of lethal drugs to them if they showed COVID symptoms (which include a runny nose, headache, and fever) as a sort of triage to save the healthcare systems rather than the patients.
“They made us put them all on the respiratory-distress protocol…morphine, scopolamine, Ativan,” Sylvie Morin, an assistant chief nurse at a Quebec care home testified to an inquest about the use of the lethal cocktails.
“A respiratory distress protocol (RDP) may sound perfectly appropriate in the context of a SARS virus. After all, a small proportion of those who contract SARS-CoV-2 develop a form of pneumonia that can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome, which requires special attention and treatment,” writes Farrow. “But the RDP described by Sylvie Morin is not such a treatment.”
‘Come now, they’re not all going to die’
The respiratory drug cocktails are well-known to be lethal and it is “a fine balance between administering a dose that successfully manages the pain and agitation of a dying patient and one that actually causes death,” according to Farrow.
She spoke to a Montreal neurologist who said such drug protocols are used almost exclusively after consultation with a palliative-care team in end-of-life circumstances. “He said he found it hard to believe such a protocol would be a standing order.”
Michael Ferri, Chief of Psychiatry at Pembroke Regional Hospital in Ontario, said the respiratory distress protocol in palliative care was not surprising but the wide use of it as a protocol without oversight or accountability was “disturbing.”
Morin, the nurse at the Ontario care home, testified that in early March 2020, her unit leader was visibly agitated and said that if COVID-19 entered the nursing home it would empty the facility. “She had 250 death certificates [and] 250 forms for the respiratory distress protocol.”
Morin had said: “Come now, they’re not all going to die.”
But Morin came to believe that “it was all set up ahead of time.” Not all residents who were administered the protocol died, “but most did.”
‘A good death needs syringes’
Farrow points to evidence that these plans to use “population triage” including end-of-life drugs for the frail and elderly seemed to be in place not just in Canada but in many countries from “the very beginning of the pandemic” and they were intended as COVID-19 standard-of care treatment. She points to a creepy exchange at a virtual meeting in April 2020, between the U.K’s Health Secretary Matt Hancock and Luke Evans, a Conservative MP and physician.
“A good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs staff to administer it,” said Evans “Do you have enough syringe drivers? Do you have enough medication, particularly midazolam and morphine?”
Hancock answered yes to both questions.
People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.
But, everyone should agree on this point:
No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.
Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms.
The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.
And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.
Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.
Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.
And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.
However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.
But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated
COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids
Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months
Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians
US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue
** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.
*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
“The MP’s questions and the Health Minister’s ready response suggest that the U.K. government had already prepared to impose end-of-life protocols on patients who had been deemed too old or frail to receive treatment,” writes Farrow.
She points to other odd protocols too, like that of the first responders of Urgences-Santé, a Quebec ambulance service, who were instructed not to resuscitate those whose hearts had stopped “to protect the health system,” according to their director Pierre-Patrick Dupont.
It seems that death for the vulnerable and frail was the default position in many COVID health protocols. There is much to investigate in the “first wave” of deaths that politicians and health officials wielded like a club to terrify citizens into conforming to lockdown and other government COVID measures. Yet there are few in governments interested in investigating and holding those responsible for what appears to be massive medical murder and negligence to account.
There was much to be afraid of for the elderly in the pandemic, it seems, but the coronavirus was far from the top of the list.