LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
COLUMBUS, Ohio, July 1, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A Franklin County judge has begun requiring some defendants to take an experimental COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their probation, saying he “just want[s] them to be safe in the community.”
According to a report by the Ohio Capital Journal on June 25, Common Pleas Judge Richard Frye started adding COVID-19 vaccination to the terms of probation for some defendants. At the time of the article, Frye had required the jab in three of the 20 cases he heard that week.
In one of the three cases, defendant Cameron Stringer was sentenced to two years of probation for improper handling of firearms and possession of cocaine. Conditions of Stringer’s probation include submitting to random drug screening, avoiding additional legal trouble, and providing proof of COVID-19 vaccination to the probation department within 30 days, according to court documents.
“I think it’s a reasonable condition when we’re telling people to get employed and be out in the community,” Judge Frye said, adding that he would not “speculate” about circumstances in which a defendant might object to the requirement for religious, philosophical, or medical reasons.
Mary Holland, president and general counsel at Children’s Health Defense, told LifeSiteNews in an interview Thursday that the judge’s decision to require COVID-19 vaccination was “jaw-dropping.”
“I would argue that that’s illegal,” said Holland, who is former research scholar and director of the graduate lawyering program at New York University School of Law and has taught courses at Columbia Law School.
“The shots at this point are Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] only,” she said. “They’re experimental. Federal law requires that people have the right to refuse an experimental medical product and that includes people on probation, people in incarcerated settings, people in mental health settings, it means everybody.”
“Coming out of World War II, the U.S. instigated the Nuremberg Code, and the first principle is: The consent of the individual is ‘absolutely essential,’” Holland said, adding that since Judge Frye is providing sustained jail time as the alternative to vaccination, “what he is doing is illegal.”
People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.
But, everyone should agree on this point:
No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.
Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms.
The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.
And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.
Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.
Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.
And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.
However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.
But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated
COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids
Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months
Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians
US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue
** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.
*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
The Nuremberg Code was a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation resulting from the famous Nuremberg Trials, which prosecuted members of the Nazi leadership for war crimes.
According to the Code, “The voluntary consent of the human subject [of a medical experiment] is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
Holland described the Nuremberg Code as “very comprehensive,” adding “when they say ‘consent,’ they actually mean ‘consent.’”
“People can’t be forced to participate in a medical experiment,” Holland said, “and because [COVID-19 vaccines] are not yet licensed – they only may be safe and effective – they are experimental. The clinical trials don’t end for the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines until 2022 and 2023. They are experimental. So they cannot be mandated.”
The Journal said it is “unclear how widespread” Judge Frye’s judicial practice is, but at least one other Ohio judge is doing something similar. A spokesman for the Ohio Supreme Court, which provides oversight of lower courts, notified the Journal about an Cuyahoga County judge who is offering “time off” probation if defendants take the shot.
According to an NBC-affiliate news station based in Cleveland, Judge David Matia has been giving defendants the option to reduce their probation time if they prove they got vaccinated.
While Matia said he cannot force defendants to take the experimental vaccine, he expressed hope that other judges would follow his example and use the option of reduced probation time to incentivize vaccination.
According to Holland, incentives to take the jab is likely unethical and violates the Nuremberg Code, but it is probably not illegal. Requiring vaccination in order to avoid jail time, however, is “a different story.”
“When you say ‘I’m going to fire you,’ ‘you can’t come to school,’ ‘you can’t have probation,’ ‘you can’t participate in this Medicaid program,’ ‘you can’t come to the hospital,’” Holland said, “those are things that are clearly coercive, and I think those things are illegal.”
“I hope that there’s a criminal defense lawyer in Ohio who’s going to take that on,” Holland added.
Children’s Health Defense has prepared a document advising employers, universities, and other institutions that it is a violation of federal law to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations because the shots are only approved under an Emergency Use Authorization and are therefore experimental.
The document cites Title 21 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which states that “individuals to whom the product is administered are informed — (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”
LifeSiteNews reached out to Judge Frye’s office for comment but has yet to hear back.