Ontario school trustee resigns over McGuinty gov’t gay-straight alliance mandate
CHATHAM, Ontario, June 14, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A trustee of the Lambton Kent District School Board has resigned in protest over the Ontario government’s controversial homosexual ‘rights’ Bill 13 that forces homosexual activist clubs on the province’s schools.
David Goldsmith, who has served as a trustee for over nine years, announced his resignation at the June 12 board meeting in Chatham, explaining that in good conscience he could not continue in a position that would compromise his moral and spiritual beliefs.
“Over the past several months I have been conflicted about my role as trustee,” Mr. Goldsmith told the Board of Trustees according to a QMI Agency report.
“The premier of this province is leading our society in a direction which is at odds with my own moral compass, and which is inconsistent with my spiritual beliefs.
“While I have never attempted to impose my beliefs or morals on other people, I must be true to my own conscience, and can no longer be part of the educational process which I feel promotes that with which I cannot agree,” he stated.
Mr. Goldsmith told QMI he believes Premier McGuinty is “fishing for votes” in the homosexual community by pushing the Liberal anti-bullying legislation.
Rick Nicholls, Conservative MPP for Chatham-Kent-Essex, told LifeSiteNews that Mr. Goldsmith’s resignation, though “unfortunate” considering his experience and long service to the school board, is not surprising.
“I think Mr. Goldsmith’s resignation from his trustee position is extremely unfortunate, but Mr. Goldsmith has every right to act based on his conscience,” Nicholls said, adding, “In a way, it’s not surprising. I’ve received dozens of phone calls and emails from concerned parents and folks within the education system that believe Bill 13 was the wrong way to approach the issue of bullying, for a variety of reasons. Most crucially, it did not tackle the root causes of bullying.”
Nicholls pointed out that amendments to Bill 13 to protect religious freedom, and their own anti-bullying Bill 14 put forward by the Conservative opposition, which treated all bullying on an equal basis, was rejected by the McGuinty government.
“The Ontario PC Caucus brought forward a number of good solutions that addressed the root causes of bullying, all of which were rejected by the Liberal government. I believe in the democratic process, I believe in open discussion from all sides, and I haven’t seen that from this government,” Nicholls told LifeSiteNews.
“Our school board officials are here to listen to students, educators, and parents. We need good people on our school boards, and it’s a troubling situation when they feel that their voices are not being heard by this government.”
Mr. Nicholls suggested that a groundswell of protest against Bill 13 by school trustees may result in more trustees following Mr. Goldsmith’s lead and resigning.
“I can guarantee you there are probably many more school board trustees who are contemplating the very same thing,” Nicholls said.
Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Catholics told LifeSiteNews that his organization applauds Mr. Goldsmith’s public statement of opposition to the Liberal government’s homosexual agenda, but noted his concern over the possibility of school boards being left in the hands of radical homosexualists if “all principled trustees suddenly resign.”
“This is further evidence to support our belief that Dalton McGuinty is conducting a war against traditionally-principled families and people of faith. When a duly-elected trustee resigns in protest over the Premier’s gay agenda, you know there’s a problem,” Fonseca observed.
“We applaud Trustee Goldsmith for publicly stating his opposition to McGuinty’s gay agenda, and shining a spotlight on the frontal assault against people of faith that is Bill 13,” Fonseca stated. “We hope his bravery will embolden Catholic school trustees and the Catholic bishops of Ontario to go further and actually reject Bill 13 by invoking Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867.”
“That constitutional privilege empowers the bishops and/or trustees to reject any government legislation which adversely affects faith and morals in Catholic schools,” Fonseca explained.
“My only fear about Goldsmith’s resignation is that if all principled trustees suddenly resign, they could make the situation worse by leaving the board in the hands of trustees who support McGuinty’s radical agenda.”
A request for comment on Mr. Goldsmith’s resignation from Carmen McGregor, chair of the board of trustees of the Lambton Kent District School Board, was not answered.
Lambton Kent District School Board
Carmen McGregor, Chair of the Board of Trustees
P.O. Box 1000, 476 McNaughton Avenue East,
Chatham, Ontario N7M 5L7
Email: [email protected]
Rick Nicholls, MPP (Chatham-Kent-Essex)
Suite 100, 111 Heritage Road
Chatham, Ontario N7M 5W7
Email: [email protected]
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.