Featured Image
Math classShutterstock

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

SALEM, Oregon, February 17, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The Oregon Department of Education suggested teachers take a course provided by a group that also asks educators “to reflect on their own biases” towards white supremacy and provides them with a framework “for deconstructing racism in mathematics.”

The department issued a bulletin on “Black History Month” this February, in which it encouraged teachers to take a course by “A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction” that, according to the course description, offers “guidance and resources for educators to use now as they plan their curriculum, while also offering opportunities for ongoing self-reflection as they seek to develop an anti-racist math practice.”

The course, in turn, recommends a toolkit of five “strides” to help teachers “navigate the individual and collective journey from equity to anti-racism.”

The first “stride” is titled “Dismantling Racism in Mathematics Instruction” and teaches participants that “[w]hite supremacy culture infiltrates math classrooms in everyday teacher actions,” which can be redressed by first “visibilizing [sic] the toxic characteristics of white supremacy culture with respect to math.”

The “everyday teacher actions” to which the guide refers include focusing students on attaining “the right answer.” Such a practice perpetuates the (apparently false) concept that “there are always right and wrong answers” in mathematics — a key example, according to the authors of the “Equitable Math” paper, of white supremacy.

The “beliefs that underlie these actions,” they say, “perpetuate educational harm on Black, Latinx, and multilingual students, denying them full access to the world of mathematics.” “Latinx” is the progressive Left’s “gender neutral” term for Latin Americans.

In addition to “perpetuating objectivity” by pursuing the right answer, requiring students to demonstrate their work is also considered a signal of racial bias.

According to the guide, which was created with the “generous financial support” of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, teachers who ask to see a student’s work are using their product on paper as “a crutch” to understand what a student is thinking. Thus, “requiring students to show their work reinforces worship of the written word as well as paternalism.” Worship of the written word refers to the theory that relying on writing skills is a key element of white supremacy culture in organizations.

To combat it, the guide suggests educators ask students to “create TikTok videos, silent films, or cartoons about mathematical concepts or procedures,” instead of showing their written calculations.

When it comes to grading, there are many racist pitfalls to avoid, according to the instructional guide.

Since grades are a way of “reinforcing perfectionism,” another tenet of white supremacy, according to the manual, teachers are asked to replace the letter-grade system with “assessments that highlight student knowledge rather than deficit knowledge.” This methodology is in line with “equity grading,” a practice that focuses on the equal outcome of student assessments, calling any difference in outcome (like one student outperforming another) an example of “unconscious and implicit bias,” and therefore racist.

Additionally, tracking a student’s success in math class is considered integral to “white supremacy culture.” The guide explains that this is because teachers often track a student’s progress on the foundation that they, as the teacher, know better than the student. This, allegedly, reinforces “paternalism and powerhoarding,” with the group even criticizing a teacher who institutes “groupings” or “seating charts” as a way of tracking students.

To help teachers make their math classes more culturally woke, the guide suggests purposely making mention of “mathematicians of color, particularly women of color and queer mathematicans of color.”

They are also encouraged to redress historical injustices against “mathematicians of color” by reclaiming “concepts attributed to white mathematicians that should be attributed to mathematicians of color.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Biological males don't belong in girls' sports - #IStandWithSelina
  Show Petition Text
415402 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 450000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

UPDATE (1/29/21) - On day one of the new administration, Biden signed an Executive Order dismantling girls sports, and allowing biological boys back into girls locker-rooms.

The order declares: "Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the rest room, the locker room, or school sports. . . . All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation."

This affront to reason effectively signals an end to girls' and women's sports, and diminishes their effort to compete on a level playing field.

Though this petition has already been delivered once, we will deliver new signatures to the US Dept of Education when restrictions permit, in honor of Selina Soule, who filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) in 2019.

UPDATE (5/29/20) - US Dep’t of Education: Letting males compete in girls’ sports violates female athletes’ civil rights

UPDATE (2/13/20) - Selina Soule and two other Connecticut high school girl track athletes, Alanna Smith and Chelsea Mitchell, have sued the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) to stop boys who claim to be girls from competing in their sport.

Soule is the same high school girl who, last year, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). That complaint is still ongoing, as the OCR has not yet handed down its guidance ruling.

This also explains why this petition is still ongoing. Please SIGN and SHARE.

But, with another track season soon coming to an end, the girls' attorneys have asked the Court for an injunction that would stop the CIAC from implementing its current policy while the lawsuit proceeds.

Soule, Smith, and Mitchell will soon run in regional and state meets, competing for state championships. This year, they would like to have the opportunity to win, fair and square.

Please learn more about the latest news concerning this case, here:

Then, please SIGN this petition. Thank you!


Selina Soule is a female athlete who now must compete against biological males because of Connecticut's policy requiring that boys who identify as girls be admitted into girls' sports competitions.

But, when boys compete in girls' sports, they win because they have a natural advantage. It's scientifically proven, and it's also common sense.

This crushes the motivation of the biological girls who have worked hard to compete on a level playing field, only to enter into competitions which they can never win, despite all of their efforts.

It also puts girls into harm's way in contact sports, AND it deprives female athletes of their right to fairly compete for college scholarships and other accolades.

This is wrong! And, that's why this URGENT petition supports Selina and all the other female athletes out there, who have put in the hours on the track or on the court.

Please SIGN this common sense petition supporting Selina Soule's complaint to the Dept of Education's Office for Civil Rights, against Connecticut's discriminatory policy.


*Above photo credit: Michael Goodin / The Daily Signal

  Hide Petition Text

Meanwhile in California, the problem of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools is also spreading. “Critical race theory is a theoretical framework, rooted in Marxism, that posits individuals as oppressed or oppressor based on their skin color,” according to Eleanor Krasne of The Heritage Foundation.

Investigative filmmaker Christopher F. Rufo recently exposed a school in Cupertino, California, which required third-grade students to undergo a lesson in “social identities,” designed to indoctrinate them with CRT.

Rufo noted that the purpose of the exercise was to teach the children that they live in a “‘dominant culture’ of ‘white, middle class, cisgender, educated, able-bodied, Christian, English speaker[s],’ who, according to the lesson, ‘created and maintained’ this culture in order ‘to hold power and stay in power.’”

The group of 8-year-olds were even asked to evaluate their “sexual identity” after being shown a series of slides that instructed them on the intersectional hierarchy of things like “transgenderism and non-binary sexuality.”

In Illinois, too, the State Board of Education recently approved a new rule called “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards” which, if ratified, will force teachers in Illinois to “embrace and encourage progressive viewpoints and perspectives,” including “systemic racism.”

The new rule will require teachers to “assess how their biases … affect … how they access tools to mitigate their own behavior (racism, sexism, homophobia, unearned privilege, Eurocentrism, etc.).” They must also affirm “that there are systems in our society that create and reinforce inequities, thereby creating oppressive conditions.”

Failure on the part of teachers to implement the new ruling will open them up to losing their license to teach in the state.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.