News

TORONTO, January 17, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The police detective in charge of Toronto’s sex crimes unit blasted the ineffectiveness of the federal government’s child pornography strategy this week. “International co-operation is a dream, national cooperation is a nightmare,” Det.-Sgt. Paul Gillespie said, citing the mixed success of Project Snowball, the largest child-porn probe in Canadian history.  Police Canada-wide have been able to arrest only 5% of the 2,329 Canadians named on a U.S. Postal Investigative Service list of child porn consumers, because of a lack of resources. Despite the federal government’s new Bill C-15A, Ontario police Det.-Insp. Robert Matthews says it is still too difficult to investigate, charge and convict someone on child-porn charges.  Det.-Insp. Matthews cited the case of Joseph Downey, 27, of Elora, Ont., one of the suspects on the U.S. list. Downey was sentenced last October to a mere 14 months house arrest after police found more than 500 items of child porn on his computer—a sentence Matthews calls “a joke.” Some of the images of sexual acts involved infants so young that their umbilical clamps were still in place.  For newswire coverage (link valid only for a few days) see:  https://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2003/01/15/11478-cp.html   CHILD PORNOGRAPHY SENTENCES ALMOST A JOKE SAY CANADIAN POLICE https://www.fotf.ca/familyfacts/tfn/2003/011703.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.