Featured Image

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

TUCSON, AZ (LifeSiteNews) – An award-winning physician is determined to overcome censorship to provide accurate and potentially life-saving information on COVID-19 and mRNA shots.

Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet has rallied together a group of prominent medical and scientific experts, including Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Michael Yeadon, to offer the public resources to help safely and effectively treat COVID-19, as well as assess the risks of its experimental gene therapy.

In an exclusive interview with LifeSiteNews, Vliet explained how her own clinical experience and medical research have shaped her understanding of COVID-19 and the mRNA jabs, and given her a burning desire to help the public with her insights.

Vliet shared that her background in internal medicine and climacteric medicine, which studies the effects of hormonal changes on the body during menopause, has informed her understanding of COVID-19 treatment, as well as the side effects of the so-called vaccines.

“The fundamental principle in internal medicine in treating a viral illness is you treat it early. And you use what you have available,” Vliet told LifeSiteNews.

When COVID-19 emerged, Vliet saw that “the longer people went without treatment, the more it moved into serious inflammation that was doing damage, and blood clots.”

“I was determined that my patients would not die on my watch, if I could do something to help them. And it made no sense that someone from Washington who doesn’t treat patients, was saying, ‘Go home and get sicker, and then go to the hospital’. No, no, that’s not how medicine works,” she continued.

“When have we ever, in the history of medicine in our lifetime, delayed treatment until someone is at end-stage illness? We don’t do it for cancer or heart disease or anything else.”

“Everybody’s primary care doctor always tells them, if you have the flu, you need to start antiviral Tamiflu, for example, within 48 hours of symptoms. It absolutely makes no sense to anyone that you would tell people to go home, get sicker, and come to the hospital when you are barely able to breathe.”

Vliet said that her research quickly uncovered a 2005 article “that Anthony Fauci’s own agency had published in their own journal of virology,” showing “that hydroxychloroquine [and] chloroquine were potent antivirals of then SARS COV-1.”

“I had already read that [the] SARS COV-2 that we were facing now shared about 78-79 percent of the same viral makeup. If it worked then, it’s probably going to work now. I had lots of patients taking hydroxychloroquine for other conditions,” said Vliet.

Vliet saw that her own patients did not experience any serious side effects with hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. At the same time, she was learning of experimental mRNA jab side effects that she says she realized were more serious than was widely acknowledged.

The doctor explained that she began receiving information that the “COVID jabs” were “affecting the testicle [in men], and the ovary in women.” This is where her long-standing work in climacteric medicine which, she explained, looks “at how reproductive hormones affect every organ system in the body, not just fertility,” came into play.

“It was like a lightning bolt that hit me when I realized the enormity of that problem,” said Vliet.

“Because I saw immediately that if we had data to show the female ovaries were damaged by the spike protein that the mRNA vaccines tricked your body to make, and if male testicles were damaged by the spike protein, we didn’t just have a fertility problem, we had a long term health problem affecting all the other organ systems: the brain, the heart, the lungs, the bones, the muscles, the immune system, the gut,” she added.

“Everything in the body is regulated with the metabolic effects of these critical reproductive hormones.”

It was this, in part, that “led to the urgency of ramping up” the Truth For Health foundation again, said Vliet.

She not only saw negative effects from the COVID jabs in the research data, but in her own clinical experience, where she had to treat people with complications from the jab.

“It was clear very quickly that the risk of these Covid jabs were far exceeding what the public was being told. I was seeing it in my practice every day with people that had medical reasons [for being] at risk for adverse events, and they were pressured into getting [a vaccine], and now I’m treating the complications from the vaccine,” Vliet said.

“And the risk of the medicines I was using was miniscule. I didn’t have any serious effects with hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. I didn’t have those problems with the patients for the treatment, but I sure was seeing it after people got this experimental jab,” she continued.

On top of that, Vliet said the “coordinated government-media-big tech collusion” is being dishonest about the actual effectiveness of the COVID jab in order to “drive people” to receive it.

“And the tragedy of it is that people are being totally lied to, when they are using the Delta variant as a reason to rush out to get the experimental COVID shot, because the COVID shots don’t protect against the Delta variant. And the Delta variant is the mildest of all of them. It’s like a bad cold.”

She said that the idea that as viruses become more transmissible, they become less deadly, is “basic virology 101.”

Vliet explained, “Viruses mutate and change to maintain survivability. Viruses can’t live on their own, they need to infect an organism that they can use to take over our cellular machinery to make more viruses. So viral mutation occurs towards making it spread to more hosts, but not to kill them, because if the viruses are killing the host, the viruses die too.”

“It’s sort of like, you got a boat to escape from a sinking ship. It doesn’t make sense to shoot a hole in the bottom of the boat. That principle has always been known in virology. And it makes sense. How else is the virus going to survive?”

Vliet lamented the fact that relatively few doctors are standing up to “the suppression of medical information,” and that even these doctors are being silenced.

“The media is suppressing the information, so even those of us who’ve been working hard to make educational videos, and to talk to groups, and to get it out on social media, if we’re deplatformed, then we’re prevented from reaching people. So it has been a devastating degree of damage to the public,” she said.

“That’s why the mission of this foundation is so important. And I will defend it totally because, in my core values, personally and as a physician, there is no greater responsibility that we are given than to stand for truth. Even if it costs us our life.”

When asked if there was any precedent to this suppression of medical information, Vliet said, “Never in my career, never ever has there been this degree of censorship across the board: medical boards, governors, media outlets, government agencies, health systems, hospitals, medical schools, research institutions.”

“Never has there been such a coordinated draconian attacking physicians who are simply trying to do their job to assess the patient, determine treatment to the best of their ability, use the tools at hand, that are FDA approved medicines, widely available, and used every day in medical practice. Never have we had anything like this. It is totally unprecedented.”

Not only are voices being silenced, but medical data is being covered up and misrepresented, said Vliet.

She addressed a study from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that claimed that “although not directly comparable,” adverse pregnancy effects in women who received the Covid jabs were “similar to incidences” studied before the COVID-19 outbreak.

The study “actually had a conclusion that was not supported by the data in the article,” said Vliet. “Independent epidemiologists reviewed the data and showed that the data in the article did not support the conclusion that was stated verbally. So then, they didn’t retract the paper, they just removed the data tables so that no one could analyze it again. So that should tell you about the reliability of the NEJM article.”

Reasons for Censorship

When asked why she believes censorship and suppression of medical information is occurring, Vliet said, “I think there are multiple agendas at play. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to raise the question of what are they doing when they violate every common sense principle that has ever existed.”

“There are 3 things that tend to motivate decisions like this: Money, power, and control,” she continued.

“By the medical censorship they are consolidating control over the population, and they are consolidating money that’s made on medical care to go to hospitals and pharma companies and government agencies that have stakes in the patent royalties.”

“They are directing the money expenditures to healthcare to the highest cost settings, which are hospitals. So the hospitals are making a fortune with the high cost of taking care of people in the hospital. They’re benefiting, big time.”

Vliet also noted that it benefits pharmaceutical companies when “new experimental high cost medicines and vaccines and all these new expensive options” are being pushed “instead of  the low cost generic medicines that cost a few dollars.”

“And then we look at power. What have many of the governors done? They’ve consolidated their power.”

Vliet said that people have given up their usual “common sense” approach to life when confronted with COVID-19.  When it comes to other purchases, she said, such as “a car, a TV, or even groceries,” people are always asking questions about “what’s it’s going to do, how reliable is it, what does it cost, is there another option?”

“When you purchase medical services and medications, why wouldn’t you ask the same questions? Is it right for me, are there any risks I need to know about, is there a lower cost option?” Vliet wondered.

“And with regard to COVID, the answer to all of those is, there’s a lower risk option, there’s an option that costs less, and there’s an option that treats you early, that we have 65 years of knowing how it works in all ages of patients,” she stated.

“So people are blindly going into one of the largest experiments in human history, asking no questions, and that’s not what they do in any other aspects of their lives. So the common sense thing to me is, why wouldn’t you be asking these questions? And why wouldn’t we as doctors ask these questions? It’s irresponsible to ignore them.”

Those who want to support legal efforts to maintain their freedom of access to information can support Vliet’s organization with tax-deductible donations at Vliet’s Truth for Health Foundation website.

No donation is too small.

“Many small dollars become one big pot that we can use to defend these rights for everyone,” said Vliet. “It turns out this is probably the most urgently needed time for this foundation. Way more urgent than what we were envisioning when we first started it 14 years ago.”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.