Jennie Stone

Personal dialogue and graphic images: Justice for All’s approach to saving lives, changing hearts

Jennie Stone
By Jennie Stone

September 4, 2012 ( - Justice For All is a pro-life training organization whose mission is to train pro-life activists to use persuasive and articulate arguments to educate others on the reality of abortion and challenge people’s viewpoints on the issue. The organization travels from campus to campus to share its message. David Lee, founder of Choices Medical Clinic and the executive director of Justice For All, launched the organization with a mission rooted in the belief that personal conversation is more effective in changing hearts and minds on abortion than impersonal public debates.

“Our goal is to train pro-life people to be good ambassadors, as well as be persuasive in their arguments,” says Jacob Burow, the operations coordinator for Justice For All. “We teach that a good ambassador seeks first to listen. We teach people to ask good questions and listen to gain an understanding of what the other person believes and why. Then we teach how to ask challenging and thought-provoking questions in a loving manner, in a way that will best help the other person really think through her position.” Justice For All encourages discussion using polls and asking questions of those who pass by the displays.

“Our smaller, fetal development kiosk asks, ‘Where Do You Draw the Line?’ for when we gain basic human rights,” Burow said. It is a great way to start the discussion on the central issue, the question of whether or not unborn living human beings have the right to live.”

Asking good questions, listening to others, and finding common ground between the pro-life and pro-choice viewpoints are critical aspects of Justice For All’s mission. “Using these skills promotes respect among everyone, and many pro-choice people tell us that although they disagree with our message, and even our display, they really appreciate how we take time to hear their positions and their stories,” Burow explained. “We even go so far as to have an open microphone on which we allow anyone to share his views with the crowd.”

Most people can agree that opening dialogue and simple polls are good tools to get people discussing abortion. However, perhaps the biggest controversy lies in one of the methods Justice For All uses: a large, 18-foot-tall display with graphic images depicting the aftermath of an abortion procedure.

“With our large [abortion] exhibit, people are generally astounded that we would go to such great effort to get our message out,” Burow said. Many passers-by express gratitude that the Justice For All team does not engage in yelling or shouting: the graphic images speak loudly enough. But naturally, there are pro-choice and pro-life activists alike who become very upset at the use of graphic images in such public places such as college campuses.

“I often relate the story of Emmitt Till, a black boy whose murder in Mississippi in 1955 was a major catalyst for the Civil Rights movement.  [Till’s] mother requested an open casket funeral, even knowing that his body was barely recognizable.  Reporters were shocked she would do this, and they asked her why she would choose an open-casket funeral.  She said: ‘I want all the world to see what they did to my boy.’

“Jet Magazine published the story of Emmitt’s death and funeral and included photos of his body as he lay in state. In a very public way, America saw the horror of what racism meant practically. They saw the face of racism in what had been done to Emmitt. The Justice For All exhibit, in a similar fashion, shows the face of choice, the horror of what abortion does to unborn children.” Burow continued, “If our exhibit being on campus today saves the life of one child, would it be worth upsetting hundreds of people?” Although the display has certainly upset many, it has also saved lives!

“We should be sensitive to the fact that they can cause an emotional train wreck for men and women who have been involved in abortion and are just beginning to learn what it is that they have done,” Burow said. He explains that he can’t know what each person experiences after an abortion, but there are post-abortive women who work with Justice For All. Lori Navrodtzke is such a woman.

“Initially, Lori was not excited about our exhibit due to the personal pain of having had an abortion herself,” said Burow. “As she slowly got more involved, she found that learning to minister to others brought more healing for herself. Lori is now actively involved in our certification program, and has found that her voice on campus has weight and authority that others’ do not.” (Lori’s reflections can be read here.)

Just this spring, a young woman named Amanda passed by the Justice For All display. Her roommate was scheduled to have an abortion, and Amanda was desperate to find the words to help her roommate choose life instead. Amanda stopped by the JFA display and spoke with Catherine, a volunteer, who helped Amanda learn how to share the informational brochure with her roommate.

A couple of days later, Catherine received a phone call at the office – Amanda’s roommate was calling to thank Justice For All for talking to Amanda, who had shared the brochure with her. She decided not to go through with the abortion, and Catherine was excited to attend a baby shower for this young lady recently.

“My immediate goal is saving children from being aborted.  But my larger goal, my main concern, is reaching out to those who have realized the bad news about abortion by sharing the good news that abortion is not the end,” Burow concludes. “I want them to know that pro-life people love them, but most importantly, I want them to know that God still loves them.”

Training through Justice For All teaches pro-life advocates how to dialogue effectively. The fall schedule is available on their website. Internship opportunities are also available. You can also sign up to receive JFA prayer updates on their website or donate to JFA or to one of their missionaries. This article reprinted with permission from

Share this article

Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve

Today’s chuckle: Rubio, Fiorina and Carson pardon a Thanksgiving turkey

Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve
By Steve Jalsevac

A little bit of humour now and then is a good thing.

Happy Thanksgiving to all our American readers.

Share this article

Featured Image
Building of the European Court of Human Rights.
Lianne Laurence


BREAKING: Europe’s top human rights court slaps down German ban on pro-life leafletting

Lianne Laurence
By Lianne Laurence

STRASBOURG, France, November 26, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – The European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that a German regional court violated a pro-life activist’s freedom of expression when it barred him from leafleting in front of an abortion center.

It further ruled the German court’s order that Klaus Gunter Annen not list the names of two abortion doctors on his website likewise violated the 64-year-old pro-life advocate’s right to freedom of expression.

The court’s November 26 decision is “a real moral victory,” says Gregor Puppinck, director of the Strasbourg-based European Center for Law and Justice, which intervened in Annen’s case. “It really upholds the freedom of speech for pro-life activists in Europe.”

Annen, a father of two from Weinam, a mid-sized city in the Rhine-Neckar triangle, has appealed to the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights at least two times before, Puppinck told LifeSiteNews.

“This is the first time he made it,” he said, noting that this time around, Annen had support from the ECLJ and Alliance Defense Fund and the German Pro-life Federation (BVL). “I think he got more support, better arguments and so I think this helped.”

The court also ordered the German government to pay Annen costs of 13,696.87 EUR, or 14,530 USD.

Annen started distributing pamphlets outside a German abortion center ten years ago, ECLJ stated in a press release.

His leaflets contained the names and addresses of the two abortionists at the center, declared they were doing “unlawful abortions,” and stated in smaller print that, “the abortions were allowed by the German legislators and were not subject to criminal liability.”

Annen’s leaflets also stated that, “The murder of human beings in Auschwitz was unlawful, but the morally degraded NS State allowed the murder of innocent people and did not make it subject to criminal liability.” They referred to Annen’s website,, which listed a number of abortionists, including the two at the site he was leafleting.

In 2007, a German regional court barred Annen from pamphleteering in the vicinity of the abortion center, and ordered him to drop the name of the two abortion doctors from his website.

But the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that the German courts had "failed to strike a fair balance between [Annen’s] right to freedom of expression and the doctor’s personality rights.”

The Court stated that, “there can be no doubt as to the acute sensitivity of the moral and ethical issues raised by the question of abortion or as to the importance of the public interest at stake.”

That means, stated ECLJ, that “freedom of expression in regard to abortion shall enjoy a full protection.”

ECLJ stated that the court noted Annen’s leaflets “made clear that the abortions performed in the clinic were not subject to criminal liability. Therefore, the statement that ‘unlawful abortions’ were being performed in the clinic was correct from a legal point of view.”

As for the Holocaust reference, the court stated that, “the applicant did not – at least not explicitly – equate abortion with the Holocaust.”  Rather, the reference was “a way of creating awareness of the more general fact that law might diverge from morality.”

The November 26 decision “is a quite good level of protection of freedom of speech for pro-life people,” observed Puppinck.

First, the European Court of Human Rights has permitted leafleting “in the direct proximate vicinity of the clinic, so there is no issue of zoning,” he told LifeSiteNews. “And second, the leaflets were mentioning the names of the doctors, and moreover, were mentioning the issue of the Holocaust, which made them quite strong leaflets.”

“And the court protected that.”

Annen has persevered in his pro-life awareness campaign through the years despite the restraints on his freedom.

“He did continue, and he did adapt,” Puppinck told LifeSiteNews. “He kept his freedom of speech as much as he could, but he continued to be sanctioned by the German authorities, and each time he went to the court of human rights. And this time, he won.”

ECLJ’s statement notes that “any party” has three months to appeal the November 26 decision.

However, as it stands, the European Court of Human Rights’s ruling affects “all the national courts,” noted Puppinck, and these will now “have to protect freedom of speech, recognize the freedom of speech for pro-lifers.”

“In the past, the courts have not always been very supportive of the freedom of speech of pro-life,” he said, so the ruling is “significant.”

As for Annen’s pro-life ministry, Pubbinck added: “He can continue to go and do, and I’m sure that he does, because he always did.”  

Share this article

Featured Image
A vibrant church in Africa. Pierre-Yves Babelon /
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

, ,

‘Soft racism’: German Bishops’ website attributes African Catholics’ strong faith to simplemindedness

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
By Pete Baklinski

GERMANY, November 26, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) --  The only reason the Catholic Church is growing in Africa is because the people have a “rather low level” of education and accept “simple answers to difficult questions” involving marriage and sexuality, posited an article on the official website of the German Bishops' Conference posted yesterday. The article targeted particularly Cardinal Robert Sarah of Guinea, the Vatican's prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and ardent defender of Catholic tradition.

First Things blogger Leroy Huizenga, who translated a portion of the article, criticized the article's view as “soft racism.”

In his article, titled “The Romantic, Poor Church,” editor Björn Odendahl writes: 

So also in Africa. Of course the Church is growing there. It grows because the people are socially dependent and often have nothing else but their faith. It grows because the educational situation there is on average at a rather low level and the people accept simple answers to difficult questions (of faith) [sic]. Answers like those that Cardinal Sarah of Guinea provides. And even the growing number of priests is a result not only of missionary power but also a result of the fact that the priesthood is one of the few possibilities for social security on the dark continent.

Huizenga said that such an article has no place on a bishops’ conference website. 

“We all know that the German Bishops' Conference is one of the most progressive in the world. But it nevertheless beggars belief that such a statement would appear on the Conference's official website, with its lazy slander of African Christians and priests as poor and uneducated (Odendahl might as well have added ‘easy to command’) and its gratuitous swipe at Cardinal Sarah,” he wrote. 

“Natürlich progressives could never be guilty of such a sin and crime, but these words sure do suggest soft racism, the racism of elite white Western paternalism,” he added. 

African prelates have gained a solid reputation for being strong defenders of Catholic sexual morality because of their unwavering orthodox input into the recently concluded Synod on the Family in Rome. 

At one point during the Synod, Cardinal Robert Sarah urged Catholic leaders to recognize as the greatest modern enemies of the family what he called the twin “demonic” “apocalyptic beasts” of “the idolatry of Western freedom” and “Islamic fundamentalism.”

STORY: Cardinal Danneels warns African bishops to avoid ‘triumphalism’

“What Nazi-Fascism and Communism were in the 20th century, Western homosexual and abortion ideologies and Islamic fanaticism are today,” he said during his speech at the Synod last month. 

But African prelates’ adherence to orthodoxy has earned them enemies, especially from the camp of Western prelates bent on forming the Catholic Church in their own image and likeness, not according to Scripture, tradition, and the teaching magisterium of the Church. 

During last year’s Synod, German Cardinal Walter Kasper went as far as stating that the voice of African Catholics in the area of Church teaching on homosexuality should simply be dismissed.

African cardinals “should not tell us too much what we have to do,” he said in an October 2014 interview with ZENIT, adding that African countries are "very different, especially about gays.” 

Earlier this month Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels, instead of praising Africa for its vibrant and flourishing Catholicism, said that African prelates will one day have to look to Europe to get what he called “useful tips” on how to deal with “secularization” and “individualism.” 

The statement was criticized by one pro-family advocate as “patronizing of the worst kind” in light of the facts that numerous European churches are practically empty, vocations to the priesthood and religious life are stagnant, and the Catholic faith in Europe, especially in Belgium, is overall in decline.

Share this article


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook