Featured Image
Pfizer COVID-19

(LifeSiteNews) — The Pfizer COVID shot has done “more harm than good,” according to research released by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance (CCCA).

A CCCA-produced video and an accompanying 50-page PDF presentation provides a deep dive into data released by Pfizer concerning the development and testing of their COVID shots.

The report by the CCCA is heavily cited, and all citations are available for the reader or viewer in the PDF, which can be found here.

At the outset of the presentation, the CCCA video quantifies and contextualizes Pfizer’s claims about the risk reduction. As the vaccines were being unveiled to the public, Pfizer said that the shot showed 95 percent efficacy seven days after the second dose. However, according the CCCA, the 95 percent actually referred to a Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) whereas the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) was only a mere 0.84 percent.

In the presentation video and in a shorter separate video, the CCCA explains the difference between RRR and ARR as it pertains to the Pfizer product.

In Pfizer COVID injection trial, eight out of 18,198 participants who were vaccinated were reported to have developed COVID, and in the unvaccinated placebo group 162 out of 18,325 were reported to have developed COVID as well. According to the trial data, even without the vaccine the risk of contracting COVID was “extremely low” at 0.88 percent among the unvaccinated and 0.04 per cent amongst those in the vaccinated trial group.

This means that the net benefit or ARR that is shown in the trial is 0.84 percent. The 95 percent number comes from relative difference between the 0.88 percent number from the unvaccinated group and the 0.04 from the vaccinated group.

“How many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than one percent over all benefit?” asked the video narrator.

‘Pfizer inoculations increase illness rather than reduce it’

The report opened up the information provided in Pfizer’s six-month report data, and said that it showed a “level one evidence of harm.” The six-month data showed a RRR of 91.3 percent in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group in terms of positive cases. However, there was also an “increase in illness and deaths” in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.

“There’s no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at a cost of increased illness and death,” said the CCCA.

The jabbed group data showed an increase in adverse events in most every category. This information was included in the Pfizer report, but only in the supplementary appendix which is difficult to find. There was a 300 percent increase in adverse events determined to have been caused by the product in the jabbed group.

Severe adverse events – things that strongly interfere with a person’s ability to function normally – were increased by 75 percent. This led the CCCA to state that the “Pfizer inoculations increase illness rather than reduce it.”

There was also an increased risk of overall death in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. There were 20 total deaths recorded in the jabbed group whereas there were 14 in the placebo.

Of concern to the CCCA was that twice as many cardiovascular-related deaths occurred in the vaccinated group.

The presentation stressed how harmful the COVID jabs are for young people especially considering that the “danger of sever COVID is so low [for kids] that its difficult to quantify.”

WATCH: Mother weeps as she tells senator how Pfizer shot left her daughter wheelchair-bound

Maddie De Garay was among the adolescents on whom Pfizer tested its product. Soon after the shot, she developed gastroparesis, nausea, vomiting, erratic blood pressure, memory loss, brain fog, headaches, dizziness, fainting, seizures, verbal and motor tics, and menstrual cycle issues. She lost feeling from the waist down, lost bowel and bladder control, and she had to have a feeding tube inserted because she lost her ability to eat. She has been wheelchair-bound for months.

This is ‘level-one evidence from a randomized controlled trial’

The CCCA called injecting children with the Pfizer jab “an unacceptable risk to their health.”

When the FDA approved the jab for children five to 11 years of age, Pfizer presented information that commented on the risk of myocarditis – which is a serious heart-inflammation issue that can lead to heart attack and stroke – and speculated that there would be zero vaccine-related myocarditis deaths.

The CCCA believed this was a misleading speculation. According to research, the greater risk of myocarditis is long-term danger that shows one in five dying around six and a half years after first experiencing myocarditis.

The CCCA paid particular attention to the difficulty of finding accurate information of vaccine-related harm in Canada. The organization believes that it is not possible that the official numbers from Canada regarding serious illness and death associated with the Pfizer jab should be so low when the information from the trials and other countries is considered.

“It’s very difficult to report a COVID-19 inoculation adverse event in Canada. A doctor has to do it on their own time, and it’s an involved process. And then it goes through several levels of bureaucratic approval before Health Canada even sees it. And then they decide whether or not they think it was related to the inoculation. The result is that adverse events don’t show up,” the narrator said.

“It’s not reasonable to believe that an inoculation that elicited adverse events in 78 percent of trial subjects elicited essentially zero adverse events in a population wide rollout. What’s happening is that the signal has been lost. It’s not that those adverse events are gone. It’s just that we’re not finding them because we’re not looking for them.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1082187 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.


Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' -

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' -

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' -

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians -

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' -

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

Ultimately, the CCCA believes that their video analysis of the Pfizer data “represents a real opportunity to hold our leaders accountable because this is not opinion or modeling or real-world evidence that can be dismissed or manipulated, but level-one evidence from a randomized controlled trial.”

The CCCA encouraged everyone who viewed the information to contact his or her local representatives and have them watch the video and read the PDF report.

In 2009, in the largest pharmaceutical settlement in the history of the U.S. Department of Justice at the time, Pfizer was forced to pay a $2.3 billion settlement “to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.