News
Featured Image

(LifeSiteNews) – Newly elected Conservative Party of Canada chief Pierre Poilievre has come out strong in recent months against the World Economic Forum (WEF) and, by extension, the Great Reset.

At a campaign event in May, he said that Canadian politicians who want to work with the WEF in Davos should go there on a “one-way ticket.”

His statement was met with strong applause.

In early September, just before the leadership votes were cast, Poilievre doubled down on his anti-WEF stance and was met with thunderous applause and a standing ovation when he said he would “ban all [his] ministers from any involvement with the World Economic Forum.”

Although not a social conservative on important issues, such as abortion and marriage, he has promised to help reclaim Canadian values and a love of freedom, and has taken a strong stance against collectivist measures, such as vaccine mandates for travel.

He has been adamant that he is Canada-first economically and called the WEF a “policy agenda” organization that seeks to impose globalist economic interests on Canada.

His comments echo what mRNA vaccine technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone said about the WEF at the World Council for Health Better Way Conference in May.

Malone said in his presentation that the WEF is nothing more than a “trade organization representing the world’s 100 largest corporations.” He added, “[It is] not a world government no matter how much they seek to label themselves as that … and has had a 30-year program of training its functionaries, its acolytes, and placing them … all over world government and various economic sectors throughout the world, including technology, media, currency, banking, etc.”

Malone stated that WEF actors had been intentionally inserted to serve the large corporations “that fund this trade organization” and that WEF head Klaus Schwab is primarily concerned with “stakeholder capitalism” where business is at the centre of society, with all other sectors serving business.

In November 2020, Poilievre posted an article on Facebook from Canadian journalist Rex Murphy entitled The ‘great reset’ no one asked for. Murphy wrote in that piece that the declared pandemic was “being taken as a cue by various eminent globalists to pursue a totally unrelated agenda.”

That agenda, according to Murphy, was being pushed by a “combination of United Nations satraps, tech billionaires and, naturally, the apocalyptic environmental contingent have decided that this time of anxiety and disruption is the perfect moment to push their agenda.”

Murphy blasted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s opportunism to use the economic chaos that resulted from government-imposed shutdowns as a moment to “reset, restate or rearrange Canada’s industrial foundation.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Demand the Conservative Party apologize for not resisting Trudeau's COVID regime
  Show Petition Text
2571 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) failed spectacularly at resisting the initial COVID lockdowns and vaccine mandates that were imposed by the government on freedom-loving Canadians.

Most CPC MPs subserviently complied with Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party in creating a police-state where our Charter Rights were regularly violated, but now Pierre Poilievre would have us believe they have turned a corner and nothing like it will ever happen again. 

How can they rebuild our trust? Well, they can start by owning up to their terrible mistakes. 

SIGN: The CPC must apologize for abandoning Canadians to Trudeau's COVID regime.

You will remember how freedom-loving Canadians were abandoned by the CPC, with Erin O'Toole calling for vaccine passports and most CPC MPs pearl-clutching about "vaccine hesitancy".

That was until the party realized how popular the Truckers' Convoy had become and got behind the movement. 

It's quite possible the CPC would still be mute on vaccine mandates and lockdowns were it not for the heroic Freedom Convoy that converged on Ottawa. 

Let's not forget the businesses, churches, schools and universities that were shuttered for months on end because of the COVID hysteria generated by politicians in Ottawa, and the CPC did nothing.

They did nothing when people started losing their livelihoods (with some Canadians even losing their lives to suicide) because of the government's deranged policy of locking people down.

The CPC must show they have learned a lesson from the COVID tyranny Canadians needlessly suffered and that they contributed to.

SIGN: Demand the CPC apologize for abandoning Canadians to Trudeau's COVID tyranny.

In yet another reminder of how disconnected from reality the CPC were, MPs like Leslyn Lewis, Marilyn Gladu and Rosemarie Falk were omitted from their "Shadow Cabinet" in November 2021 because they dared to question the COVID shots.

Canadians must still contend with vaccine mandates in some settings and the intrusive ArriveCAN system in order to re-enter the country, while we are among the last three countries in the world to continue discriminating against unvaccinated visitors who remain barred from entering. 

As Pierre Poilievre takes the reigns of the CPC, conservative voters must demand an apology from the party that abandoned them during the COVID-hysteria of the past two years. 

SIGN: The CPC can rebuild trust by apologizing for capitulating to Trudeau's COVID tyranny.

  Hide Petition Text

Economic solution

Although there are a host of societal and philosophical goals attached to the WEF’s plan to reset the world economy, it is my opinion that – although dangerous – the ideas of the reset crowd are basically insane and make science fiction look like reality.

This is not to say that damage will not and has not been caused due to the WEF. But I tend to agree with Malone and Poilievre that at root of the WEF ethos is a form of stakeholder capitalism that essentially uses political movements to co-opt the buying power of gullible consumers. Again, this money is attached to an anti-God ideology, but a good case can be made that the most effective political tool to fight the reset would be an economic tool.

If the Great Reset relies on a type of globalist corporatism, as Malone said in his presentation, then a Canada-first industrial movement would cut to the heart of stakeholder capitalism as presented by the WEF.

This seems to be what Poilievre believes and is pushing for.

He has hammered home the message of getting rid of the “gatekeeper economy” of Trudeau, so that Canadian industry can flourish.

What he means when he says “gatekeeper” is essentially a bureaucrat who puts a load of red tape in front of Canadians who want to produce or start businesses.

Economic liberty helps social conservatives

As mentioned, Poilievre is not a social conservative. However, he does seem to disdain the woke narrative of our day.

While he himself will not (likely) champion socially conservative causes, he believes that it is wrong for gatekeeping bureaucrats to attach money to ideology.

If he follows through with his intention to liberate Canadians from economic strangleholds, this means that conservatives will not have to jump through endless hoops to get funding or to simply be left alone by tax-hounds with a woke agenda.

This is not to say that money or economic freedom cures social evil, but it cannot be denied that bureaucracy is likely the strongest tool of the Marxist leftists who like to attach the rainbow and climate agenda to every penny spent or doled out in Canada.

To conclude, Poilievre might be the right man for the job to strike at the heart of the Great Reset in Canada, because his approach is strictly economic, thus would not be easily scoffed at in terms of “conspiracy” or “culture war.”

As far as Poilievre is concerned, the WEF is bad for Canadian bank accounts, and what is bad for Canadian bank accounts is bad for Canadians. Simple as that.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

7 Comments

    Loading...