News
Featured Image

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 29, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) — A 39-year old law that bans federal funding for abortions except in the cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother “discriminates against low-income women,” says Planned Parenthood's CEO.

In her opening statement to the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee, Cecile Richards said that “while the federal policy, in my opinion, discriminated against low-income women, no federal funds pay for abortion services at PP or anywhere else except in the very limited circumstances allowed by law.”

Richards' comments are a reference to the Hyde Amendment, which has been a part of the annual Medicaid budget since 1976. Named for former Rep. Henry Hyde, R-IL, it has been a so-called “rider” for Medicaid funding that has long been opposed by the abortion industry.

Click “like” if you are PRO-LIFE!

However, many federally-funded abortions get around the Hyde Amendment. At least four of the FDA's approved contraceptives double as abortifacients, including the popular intrauterine device — and these drugs and devices are paid for domestically and in other countries by Title X and other funding.

Approximately one-fifth of Planned Parenthood's government funding is through the Title X program. Richards' comments came during a hearing about how Planned Parenthood uses its funding — and whether some of those uses are illegal.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.