Featured Image

MELBOURNE (LifeSiteNews) — A conduct investigation is reportedly underway after a video circulating widely on social media showed police in Melbourne brutally assault a man by slamming his skull into the hard floor of a railway station.

Police allegedly confronted the man last Wednesday after he participated in protests against the harsh measures enacted during the city’s sixth lockdown.

The incident, which immediately went viral on social media, took place at Flinders Station, a railway station in Melbourne, the capital city of Australia’s state of Victoria.

In the video, police officers are seen speaking with a man who appears to be calmly answering questions. Another officer then rapidly moves into the frame and, seemingly without provocation, seizes the man from behind and throws him to the ground.

The sound of the man’s skull hitting the floor can be heard in the recording.

“This poor guy was calm, he was just talking to the police, you can see it in the video then he gets thrown to the ground,” the caption on the original video read.

The man was reportedly rendered unconscious by the assault.

The witness who filmed the incident told “when he woke up he was calling for his mum.”

‘We are all very disturbed by this and I’ve been inundated with people worldwide wanting to know if this man is alright,” the witness said, adding that “[w]e understand the paramedics looked at him but not sure what happened after that.”

The man’s current condition remains unknown.

Under Premier Dan Andrews, Victoria’s lockdowns over the past year and a half have been particularly harsh, with residents subject to curfews, travel restrictions, and bans on public gatherings. The draconian lockdowns have spurred repeated protests leading to intense confrontations with law enforcement officers.

The brutal police action at Flinders Station occurred during the fourth day of anti-lockdown protests last week which have swept Melbourne as the beleaguered city endures its sixth strict lockdown since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.

It is unclear what specific events led to Victorian police subjecting the man at Flinders Station to such brutal physical violence.

— Article continues below Petition —
BOYCOTT United over religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions
  Show Petition Text
21730 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 22500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.


United has agreed to put off its threatened COVID vaccine mandate for another 2 weeks, as proceedings came to a screeching halt in federal court last Friday.

Mark Paoletta, a partner at Schaerr Jaffe representing the plaintiffs, was quoted by Breitbart as saying:

"Now everyone can follow the court’s decision to take the time and care needed to carefully consider the legitimate claims our clients have as we seek a solution that allows United to take necessary steps to combat COVID-19 while respecting the civil rights of valuable employees who have sincere religious objections or medical conditions that make them unable to take the vaccine."

While this appears to be a lessening of tensions and possibly a step in the right direction, we must wait till the case resumes on October 15 to see if United will scrap their draconian mandate.

In the meantime, we must continue to apply pressure on United.

So, please continue to SIGN and SHARE this pledge to boycott the airline giant for threatening to impose harsh measures - including forced unpaid leave - in order to coerce employees with religious or medical objections to the vaccine to take the jab.

Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE!


United Airlines is accused of not respecting the religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions which the company offered to employees who cannot, in good conscience or health, take the vaccine.

2,000 employees of the industry giant are represented in two court cases which have been initiated to stop United from laying-off or indefinitely furloughing workers who have sought COVID vaccine exemptions.

Please SIGN this BOYCOTT of United and send the airline a stong message that you will not support the implementation of these draconian measures.

Many United Airlines employees have sincerely held religious objections to taking the COVID vaccines, while other employees have been told by their doctors not to take the vaccine due to health concerns.

The religious and medical rights of these employees must be respected, and, will hopefully be vindicated by the courts.

But, airlines are for-profit businesses, and apart from the legal incentives, there must also be financial incentives for them to respect their employees' religious and medical rights, and, indeed, the same rights of all Americans.

And, that's why we are calling for a boycott.

The CEO of United Airlines, Scott Kirby, and HR Manager, Kate Gebo, need to understand that the American public will not support businesses who force their employees or customers to violate their religious beliefs or their doctors' recommendations.

Of course, this is totally unnecessary.

United could simply make reasonable accommodations for their employees who are claiming either a religious or medical exemption.

But, until United adopts that policy, we are asking you to consider boycotting the "unfriendly skies" and find another airline for your travel needs. By doing so, you will meaningfully stand shoulder-to-shoulder with these aggrieved United employees.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition to boycott United Airlines over the company's failure to respect religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions for its employees.


'Pilots seek restraining order against United Airlines’ ‘unlawful, life-threatening, vaccine-mandate’' -

'United Airlines will put employees with religious, medical COVID vaccine exemptions on unpaid leave' -

**Photo Credit: EQRoy /

  Hide Petition Text

On Thursday, Police Commissioner Shane Patton told reporters that an investigation would be underway to determine the “full circumstances” of the incident.

“We’ll investigate that. I don’t know what the full circumstances are,” Patton told 3AW.

Saying he’s not “jumping to any conclusions,” the commissioner said that “there’s always context to everything,” and assured reporters the incident would be investigated “with an open mind.”

Patton said the officers beating back private citizens protesting government lockdowns have been overall “responding proportionately in an environment that was dynamic, threatening and frightening.”

“I couldn’t be prouder of them,” Patton said. “What they’ve done and the way they’ve conducted themselves.”

Acknowledging that “there’ll be incidents that appear, or may be inappropriate,” the commissioner said that “any of them that are, we will fully investigate”.

Writing for Sydney Criminal Lawyers, Sonia Hickey decried the brutal assault at Flinders Station, saying it could have proved fatal.

“In amongst all the footage of this week’s Melbourne protests, a horrific video has emerged of a police officer approaching a man from behind and violently throwing him head first to the ground at Flinders Station in the CBD – in an attack that had the potential to prove fatal,” Hickey said.

“The man is standing alone and talking to police officers, when an officer approaches him from behind, grabs him by the shoulders and violently slams him against to the hard floor,” Hickey recounted, noting that “[w]itnesses reported that the man was knocked unconscious, and left in a pool of his own blood and urine.”

Hickey expressed reservation as to whether the incident would undergo proper investigation.

“In Victoria, the Police Conduct Unit initially investigates complaints of misconduct,” Hickey said, adding that the oversight body, known as the Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC), may be tasked with investigating any serious allegations of police misconduct.

Still, Hickey said IBAC is “chronically under-resourced and has no power to discipline, let alone criminally prosecute, police officers – it can only make recommendations, which may or may not be followed by police or the DPP.”

Victorian law enforcement officers have sparked criticism for their heavy-handed treatment of citizens, many of whom have lost jobs and been separated from family as a result of crushing lockdown policies as Australia attempts to eliminate COVID-19 from the continent.

In last week’s protest, which was spurred on by opposition to a COVID vaccine mandate for tradespeople, many in Melbourne took to the streets to assert their rights.

Under current COVID protocols, public protest is illegal in the city, with residents not permitted to leave their homes except for brief periods of time for specific approved reasons.

Hundreds of protesters were arrested last week, and videos from the protests show police officers on horseback and in riot gear engaging in violent confrontations with protesters.

Police have announced they will be “less tolerant” of anti-lockdown protesters in future confrontations.

“This follows the broad use of tear gas, pepper pellets and stinger grenades against protesters,” Hickey observed, noting that “it is unclear as to what this reduced tolerance will entail.”

On Thursday, anti-lockdown protesters were stunned by Victorian Police’s show of force, as battalions of heavily armed police supported by Counter Terrorism units patrolled the streets of Melbourne’s CBD (Central Business District). This coincided with the introduction of extraordinary tactics such as the temporary restricted airspace order over Melbourne’s CBD to prevent media from filming police operations.

Video has also emerged of riot-gear-clad officers shooting protesters with rifles loaded with rubber bullets at the Shrine of Remembrance, a memorial set up to honor fallen military heroes who died defending Australians’ freedom.

In another video, officers can be seen pursuing fleeing protesters, shooting them in the back as they run away.