News
Featured Image
Pope FrancisPhoto by Sean Gallup/Getty Images

(LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has defended the former Archbishop of Paris, who resigned 11 days ago after allegations of having an intimate relationship with a woman, saying that he had only accepted the resignation “not on the altar of truth but on the altar of hypocrisy.”

Speaking to Vatican-approved reporters on the flight from Greece to Rome, Pope Francis fielded questions on the resignation of Archbishop Michel Aupetit, whose November 26 resignation was swiftly accepted by the Pope on December 2, but seemingly only because Aupetit had “lost his reputation … because of people’s chatter,” but not due to the nature of the allegations themselves.

“I ask myself what he did that was so serious that he had to resign. Someone answer me, what did he do? And if we do not know the charge we cannot convict,” said Francis.

Archbishop Aupetit offered his resignation after French weekly Le Point accused him of having had an intimate relationship with an adult woman in 2012, based on an email in which the nature of the intimate relationship was revealed. Aupetit had originally intended to keep his resignation secret, in order to allow the Pope to decide whether to accept it or not “in total freedom.”

Aupetit rejected the accusations, saying that while he did not have a physical affair with the woman, he may have had “an ambiguous attitude” that suggested “the existence” of an “intimate relationship and sexual acts.” However, sources of Le Point and LifeSiteNews confirmed that the episode did occur.

On his return flight to Rome, the Pontiff appeared to rebuke both the media and Catholics outraged at the alleged breach of clerical celibacy, saying that Aupetit had been seemingly condemned only by “public opinion, chatter.”

As for the allegations of immorality, the Pope downplayed the seriousness of any alleged relationship, admitting that while the alleged episode was a sin, it was not serious: “It was a failing against the sixth commandment, but not total, of small caresses and massages that he did to the secretary.”

“This is a sin, but it is not of the most serious sins, because the sins of the flesh are not the most serious,” he continued.

“The most serious are those” relating to “pride, hatred,” added the Pope, before aligning himself personally with the former archbishop and attacking Catholics for not accepting “a sinful bishop.”

“Therefore, Aupetit is a sinner, as am I … Perhaps, as Peter was, the bishop on whom Jesus Christ founded the Church. How come the community of that time accepted a sinful bishop, one that had sinned with much ‘angelcality,’ as it was to deny Christ!”

He described the early Church as being “a normal Church, it was used to feeling that it was always sinful, everyone. It was a humble Church.” In contrast, Francis criticized the Church of today, saying that “our Church is not used to having a sinful bishop.”

“We pretend to say: ‘My bishop is a saint’. No! this little red cap…we are all sinners.”

Reporting on Appetite’s resignation, LifeSiteNews’ Jeanne Smits had noted that the speed with which it was accepted by the pontiff lent credence to the veracity of the alleged relationship. In contrast, La Croix suggested that this explanation was “quite unlikely.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9415 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/states-are-fighting-the-left-over-the-morally-bankrupt-critical-race-theory/

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/attorney-general-tasks-fbi-to-move-against-parents-protesting-leftist-agenda-in-schools/

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/ohio-parents-testify-yes-critical-race-theory-is-in-our-schools-and-we-say-no

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Seeming to confirm that the Vatican had known of the allegations surrounding Aupetit, La Croix hinted that the speedy acceptance of the resignation was due to the obvious problems Aupetit had with his diocesan clergy that culminated in two vicar generals stepping down during the past few months.

But referencing “chatter” or gossip, Francis suggested that such was the only reason why the archbishop had been forced to resign, rather than the details of his alleged breach of clerical celibacy.

“But when the chatter grows, grows, grows and takes away a person’s fame; no, he will not be able to govern because he has lost his reputation. Not because of his sin, which is sin — like Peter’s, like mine, like yours — but because of people’s chatter.”

“That is why I accepted the resignation, not on the altar of truth but on the altar of hypocrisy,” added the Pope.

The Pope’s in-flight comments have already caused consternation among Catholics, with Catholic Ordinariate priest Fr. David Palmer pointing to a Scriptural verse, saying, “Flee sexual immorality. Every other sin that a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body” (1 Cor 6:18).

Commenting on the interview, Michael Hichborn, founder and president of the Lepanto Institute, likened the Pope to an abuser, saying that “an abuser is one who blames the victim for the abuser’s conviction and punishments. If Pope Francis is concerned about a fair trial for the archbishop, then he should grant one.”

“But by simply accepting Abp. Aupetit’s resignation, he closes off the possibility of a clerical trial while casting shade on the victims,” Hichborn told LifeSiteNews.

“Pope Francis claimed that ‘sins of the flesh are not the most serious,’ giving the impression that what the archbishop is said to have done is not that big a deal,” added Hichborn. “It would do him well to remember the words of St. Jacinta of Fatima that ‘the sins which cause the most souls to go to Hell are the sins of the flesh.’”

Author and catechist Deacon Nick Donnelly told LifeSiteNews that the pontiff was correcting the faithful rather than Archbishop Aupetit. “It appears that Pope Francis blames people for ‘gossiping’ about Archbishop Aupetit’s sexual sin, rather than the prelate for breaking the sixth commandment.”

“He even goes so far as to make the erroneous claim that sins of the flesh are not the most serious, which is totally contrary to sacred Scripture. St. Paul writes, ‘Shun fornication! Every sin that a person commits is outside the body; but the fornicator sins against the body itself. Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you…’ (I Corinthian 6:18-19).”

“It’s also incomprehensible that Pope Francis ignores the gravity of a bishop committing sexual sins,” continued Donnelly. “As Lumen Gentium puts it, bishops receive the ‘fullness of priesthood’ and as such have been given the grace and responsibility of ‘promoting greater holiness in the Church by their daily example, having become a pattern for their flock’ (Lumen Gentium, 41). Why can’t Pope Francis bring himself to say this?”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.