News

Washington, July 4, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) – So far, President Bush has been a great disappointment to social conservatives on the issue of protecting the institutions of marriage and the family and traditional American moral culture from powerful advocates of the homosexual agenda. At a July 2 White House press conference the following brief exchange took place between a reporter and the president:  QUESTION: Mr. President, do you support, or do you oppose a federal constitutional amendment that would define marriage as a union between a man and a woman?  THE PRESIDENT: I don’t know if it’s necessary yet. Let’s let the lawyers look at the full ramifications of the recent Supreme Court hearing. What I do support is the notion that marriage is between a man and a woman. (from White House website)  The Washington Post quotes various Republican sources who say that while the Bush Administration is very concerned about alienating the GOP’s conservative base, it has also been taking steps to appeal to the homosexual vote. A homosexual newspaper in Texas reports that the administration has appointed about 20 openly homosexual officials to government positions. (from Agape press)  Disappointment With Bush On Gay Activism Deepens https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2003/jun/03060302.html   Conservatives Ask White House Support for FMA https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2003/jun/03060302.html   Bush cool on measure to ban gay ‘marriage’  https://washingtontimes.com/national/20030703-120914-5075r.htm

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.