News
Featured Image
Cleveland Clinic buildingShutterstock

CLEVELAND, Ohio, June 11, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Researchers at the prestigious Cleveland Clinic, an academic hospital consistently ranking among America’s finest medical institutions, have published a study on the need for previously COVID-infected individuals to receive a vaccine to be immune to COVID-19, finding that “[i]ndividuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.”

In evaluating the necessity of vaccinating those who previously contracted and have since recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, the clinic examined over 52,000 employees of the Cleveland Clinic Health System from the day that COVID vaccines began being administered on December 16, 2020.

Over the next five months the study followed developments in COVID infection within the group, categorizing the participants into four major subsets: previously infected individuals who were vaccinated, previously infected individuals who were not vaccinated, previously uninfected individuals who received the vaccine, and previously uninfected individuals who did not receive the vaccine.

Of the large overall sample size, around 5 percent, or 2,579 individuals, were considered previously infected (returning a positive PCR test for COVID-19 at least 42 days before the study commenced), slightly more than half of whom, 1,359, did not receive a COVID vaccine before the end of the study period. The researchers reported that not one of the 2,579 previously infected individuals became infected with SARS-CoV-2 throughout the course of the study, “including 1,359 who did not take the vaccine.”

In fact, the study revealed that all 2,154 infections recorded were in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The vast majority of these infections, 2,139, were associated with unvaccinated individuals, whereas 15 infections were considered breakthrough cases in vaccinated individuals.

For the purposes of the study, the researchers defined a vaccinated individual as one who had received both doses of either the Moderna or Pfizer experimental mRNA vaccines, with at least 14 days passing since their second shot. Every other participant, even if they had their first jab or became infected within two weeks of their second shot, was considered unvaccinated in the study.

The study showed no statistically significant difference in cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection between three of the main categories, namely, those who were previously infected, be they vaccinated or not, and the previously uninfected who did receive a full vaccine regimen. Only those who were previously uninfected and did not receive the vaccine exhibited any significant incidence of infection with COVID-19, accounting for 99.3 percent of positive tests. The remaining 0.7 percent of positive tests related to vaccinated individuals who were previously uninfected.

The researchers thus concluded that “subjects previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 are unlikely to get COVID-19 reinfection whether or not they receive the vaccine,” prompting them to call “into question the necessity to vaccinate those who have already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.” The study awaits peer review.

Additionally, the researchers concluded that, without prior infection, receiving an experimental mRNA vaccine provided a significant improvement in immunity from the SARS-CoV-2 virus; however, owing to the movement of infected subjects from the unvaccinated to vaccinated category as the study progressed, it was not statistically possible to ascertain the true effectiveness of the vaccines against COVID-19, only that no significant benefit was gained from vaccinating those previously infected with the virus.

The team was able to declare with some certainty, though, that a robust immunity from COVID-19 was gained from prior infection with the pathogen. Indeed, the authors pointed to at least three previous studies which corroborate this finding, all of which “found very low rates of reinfection … among survivors of COVID-19.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1070071 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

One such study, published May 24 in the journal Nature, found a significant presence of antibodies against COVID-19 in subjects previously infected with the virus, providing “strong evidence for long-lasting immunity,” according to study author Dr. Ali Ellebedy, Ph.D.

The study examined the long-term effects following a COVID infection, concluding that long-lived plasm cells created in the bone marrow “produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives,” granting lasting immunity.

Another study, published the same day in the Lancet, found that individuals infected with COVID-19 remain immune to reinfection for a “substantial” period of time. This follows numerous other studies determining vaccination to be unnecessary for providing immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection for the previously infected. In fact, a study emanating from Israel found that natural immunity from infection outstripped any protection offered by the currently available COVID vaccines.

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine professor Dr. Marty Makary supported the growing evidence for natural immunity in a recent radio interview and called out U.S. government bodies for “ignoring natural immunity.”

Makary explained that “[t]here is more data on natural immunity than there is on vaccinated immunity, because natural immunity has been around longer,” adding that “[w]hen you get natural immunity from a severe COVID infection, you have natural immunity that’s probably lifelong.”

“Right now in America, 62 percent of all adults have been vaccinated and half of the unvaccinated have natural immunity. That means 80 to 85 percent of adults in America today have immunity … That’s called herd immunity and we are there,” the professor said.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.