Prime Minister Stephen Harper a ‘nice’ man who accepts 491 murders of born alive babies?
February 1, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Canadians are known to be "nice" people. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is admittedly a "nice" man. It is hard to strongly dislike him. He is a middle-of-the-road, get-along sort of guy who sings and plays the piano and is a genuinely passionate Canadian hockey fan.
As far as I know, Harper is not known for having a harsh temperament and is in many ways a rather decent fellow. He has kept the Canadian economy on an enviable even keel, and Canadian society relatively stable compared to the rest of the world. He does not advocate any radical causes and he has taken some commendable pro-family actions.
There is, however, now a very disturbing development with Stephen Harper. He seems to be comfortable with, or at least quite tolerant of, murder: that is, the alleged murder of 491 innocent Canadian human beings who had the misfortune to be born alive after failed abortions. He also seems very comfortable with the ongoing killing of unborn children at any time before birth at the rate of at least over 100,000 per year (based on what has been reported) - now totaling in the millions since 1969.
Harper's latest revelation of his attitude towards the heinous crime of homicide of born alive aborted babies is similar to that of Barack Obama, a-not-so-"nice" person who four times voted against legislation to protect children born alive after failed abortions.
Again, I don’t think Stephen Harper is a bad man. How he allowed himself to be brought to such a low level as to accept this gross depravity, this profound evil, is something Canadians have an obligation to help him to face and to make amends for.
Since being in power, Prime Minister Harper has attempted to block every single motion or proposed legislation, no matter how very reasonable or innocuous, that could in any way be construed as being related to children in their mothers' wombs.
Now, the PM's opposition to the call by three MP's for an RCMP investigation into what are allegedly, in many cases, criminal acts of homicide related to the deaths of 491 babies after failed late-term abortions, reveals something especially disturbing about the Prime Minister. It’s that the PM seems to have gone exceedingly beyond misperceived political necessity and made an unnecessary, deadly pact with the devil in order to retain power.
The PM and most of the Canadian media do not seem to comprehend how truly diabolical this situation has become. Imagine, in a hospital setting, a child is born alive after a failed abortion, is moving and thrashing, whimpering and making other efforts to survive and all medical staff do nothing, or even even worse, take actions to kill this little, utterly innocent one who did not die in the womb at the hands of the abortionist.
Like Barack Obama, Stephen Harper claims to be Christian. I don't know where he is on that today, but I suggest this latest incident indicates Harper is now in especially dire need of prayers and other personal help and effective rebuke. He is also is need of a wave of strong, but not incendiary communications, from many thousands of Canadians.
To those of our readers who love to blast people with your emails and letters, forget it. Those communications are never helpful. Yes, this situation is also about politics, but there is something else going on here and that is naked, raw evil. We do not fight such evil with rants and curses.
I have several times quoted before on LifeSiteNews Professor Peter Kreeft's frequent reminder that our battle is not against flesh and blood but rather against "principalities and powers." That is, it is ultimately a spiritual battle that precludes condemning individual persons.
Canadians need to reach Harper’s heart and his mind, but definitely not attack the man. That is how conversions are brought about. That is how many of us - myself included - who were on the other side in the past, were jarred awake, had our lives dramatically changed for the better, and became involved in the movement today.
Canadians can't accept this latest block from the PM. This one is far too much. Far too unnacceptable. Far too sickening and devoid of any sense of decency and justice and respect for criminal law.
It makes a mockery of all human rights and the entire criminal code.
This one is essentially putting Canada on the fast track to full acceptance of the homicide of infants born from failed abortions, to infanticide, and then more...and more. There will be no stopping this death train unless leaders are made to wake up from this nightmare.
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.