Featured Image

A pro-abortion Democrat accused a pro-life politician of having a weak personality because she turned to alcohol, drugs, and thoughts of suicide after she had two abortions.

The verbal dust-up occurred between Republican Texas State Representative-elect Molly White and State Rep. Dawnna Dukes, a Democrat, during a September 20 abortion debate, with Dukes revealing for the first time publicly that she, too, has had an abortion.

White, who won the March Republican primary for House District 55, was taking part in the Texas Tribune’s “Women’s Health Debate” panel, where her introduction included that she was post-abortive and that her experience with two abortions had led her to drug and alcohol use, suicidal thoughts, and other health challenges.

The panel began with on Texas House Bill 2 (HB2), which bans abortion after 20 weeks, requires abortionists to have admitting privileges within 30 miles of their facility and requires that abortion facilities meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers (ACS).

White’s fellow panelist Dukes, her soon-to-be colleague in the Texas legislature, attempted to debunk the idea that abortion has any negative effects on a woman’s life, taking personal shots at White in the process during the panel, which was audio recorded by the Tribune.

“It is a personality type that would turn to using drugs and alcohol,” Dukes said, “not the procedure that makes one do that.”

“And I know for a fact that one who has an abortion does not have alcohol and drug-related issues,” she said. “That is a personality type that should have gotten some psychological treatment.”

White took issue with Dukes’ statements equating post-abortive conditions with personality disorders, saying unless one has had an abortion they shouldn’t tell a post-abortive woman what she feels.

“OK, then, fine,” Dukes declared. “To the world: I had an abortion. And I’m not a drug addict, and I’m not an alcoholic.”

White defended herself, saying, “I’m not a drug addict, and I’m not an alcoholic. But I don’t live in denial, either.”

White said the discussion should either be about abortion or women’s health, but the two should be separated, because abortion is not about women’s health. “A safe abortion is women’s health,” Dukes replied.

After White recounted how she was lied to about fetal development before her first abortion, Dukes continued to make it personal, replying, “Well, you did it twice. You should have done your research.”

White, who is the founder and U.S. director of Women for Life International and a worldwide speaker on the subject of abortion, told LifeSiteNews that she recognized Dukes as post-abortive prior to Dukes’ confirming it because of how hard, defensive, and angry Dukes was.

“I used to be that way,” White said. “I can pick them out of a crowd, because I walked in their shoes.”

White said that aside from trying to insult her by saying she had a weak personality, Dukes said outlandish things that White couldn’t rebut them, because she was sensitive to exposing Dukes' post-abortive status.

“I refrained from challenging her on a personal level,” she told LifeSiteNews.

White approached Dukes after the panel and spoke of burying the hatchet and working together in the Texas statehouse. White told LifeSiteNews their conversation was civil.

White also reached out to Dukes last week in the hopes of talking more with her, but has not heard back from her.

Click “like” if you are PRO-LIFE!

She said she wants to carry the post-abortion reconciliation message after taking office because, she said, Dukes is not the only post-abortive woman serving in the Texas legislature.

“I’m really hoping God will use me as an instrument of healing,” White told LifeSiteNews.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.