News

OTTAWA, Feb 19, 2001 (LSN.ca) – Bills seeking to protect the traditional definition of marriage as the union between one man and one woman were recently introduced in both federal Houses. Liberal Senator Anne Cools introduced legislation Jan 31 seeking to specify in law the meaning of the term “marriage” to indicate “a voluntary union of one man and one woman as husband and wife to the exclusion of all others.” Cools’s bill S-9 notes that the traditional definition of marriage was “declared in the 1866 decision of Hyde v. Hyde in the Courts of Probate and Divorce in the United Kingdom” and was “understood in sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867.”

Meanwhile in the House of Commons, Canadian Alliance MP Jim Pankiw introduced bill C-266 on Feb 14, which would amend the marriage act so that by the use of the notwithstanding clause the traditional definition of marriage would be protected against court tampering.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.