News
Featured Image
Planned Parenthood, Ferndale, Michigan, USA - March 24, 2017: Planned Parenthood building with pro-life volunteers praying to end abortion, March 24, 2017, Ferndale, MichiganLinda Parton/Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) – Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed an amicus brief in a Michigan court in an attempt to defend a currently unenforced pro-life law first passed in 1931 that makes it a felony to commit abortions.

ADF has three requests for the Michigan Court of Claims in the brief filed Wednesday. First, it asks the court to outright dismiss a lawsuit challenging the pro-life law because there are not two adverse parties to the suit. Planned Parenthood and the ACLU sued to stop the law, but Attorney General Dana Nessel said she will refuse to defend it.

Prosecutors have not enforced the law as Roe v. Wade currently prohibits states from prosecuting abortionists for killing babies. The abortion lobby and state leaders, including Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, want the law struck down now in anticipation of a possible ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson that could give states more power to pass and enforce pro-life laws.

Gov. Whitmer has filed a parallel lawsuit in Oakland County to stop prosecutors from enforcing the law.

“Plaintiffs are under no imminent threat of prosecution. Roe has protected their conduct in taking innocent, human life for nearly half a century,” ADF attorneys argued on behalf of Right to Life of Michigan and the Michigan Catholic Conference. “It is not clear how the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in Dobbs. And even if Dobbs eventually overturns Roe in whole or in part, a prosecutor would still need to make the decision to enforce [the 1931 law] against these Plaintiffs.”

Second, ADF attorneys have asked Judge Elizabeth Gleicher to recuse herself due to her past and current association with Planned Parenthood and the ACLU. Gleicher announced through her clerk that she previously served as an attorney for Planned Parenthood and continues to make annual donations to the organization.

“Here, the presiding judge has served as an ACLU lawyer for Plaintiff Planned Parenthood in challenging a Michigan pro-life law requiring informed consent before an abortion procedure may take place,” the amicus brief stated. “The presiding judge has served as a lawyer for the ACLU in challenging a Michigan pro-life law that prohibited the use of public funds to pay for abortion unless abortion was necessary to save the mother’s life.” It included other examples of cases where Judge Gleicher assisted with pro-abortion legal efforts.

In 1998, she won the “Planned Parenthood Advocate Award,” the brief stated. The attorneys argued that in light all of these facts “there can be no doubt this conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to rule with impartiality has been compromised.”

Finally, ADF argued in its brief that the court set a “briefing schedule” to allow its attorneys to argue why it should be allowed to intervene on behalf of Right to Life of Michigan and the Michigan Catholic Conference and to argue for recusal.

RELATED:

Judge faces calls to recuse herself from Planned Parenthood case after admitting she’s a donor

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...