Featured Image

ROWAN COUNTY, Kentucky, November 6, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, has lost her bid for re-election.

Davis, who ran as a Republican, was first elected in 2014 as a Democrat. Tonight, she lost to Elwood Caudill Jr., a Democrat, by a 54% – 46% margin, or about 700 votes. Caudill previously lost to Davis by 23 votes in the 2014 Democratic primary.

Before beating Davis, Caudill defeated David Ermold, a homosexual man who was refused a marriage license by Davis in 2015, during the Democratic primary earlier this year.

Davis garnered national attention in September 2015 for defying a court order to grant marriage licenses to homosexuals on the grounds that she had religious objections to same-sex “marriage.” Her refusal to abide by the decree landed her in jail for five days.

“To issue a marriage license which conflicts with God’s definition of marriage, with my name affixed to the certificate, would violate my conscience,” she said at the time. “It is not a light issue for me. It is a Heaven or Hell decision. For me it is a decision of obedience. I have no animosity toward anyone and harbor no ill will.”

The Kentucky legislature eventually passed a law so that marriage licenses would not have to include county clerk’s names.

Davis met Pope Francis in 2015 at the Washington nunciature with the help of then-Apostolic Nuncio to the U.S. Archbishop Carlo Viganò.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.