Featured Image

(LifeSiteNews) – According to an article published Wednesday in the Jesuit-run America Magazine, those who discern against taking an abortion-tainted COVID-19 vaccine are committing “the ultimate sin of omission” by their refusal.

Entitled “Refusing the Covid vaccine is the ultimate sin of omission for Catholics today” and authored by Father Terrence Klein, the article takes aim at Catholics who allegedly “put their focus on protecting liberty rather than life” in their decision to forego vaccines developed, derived, or tested using aborted fetal cell lines.

Klein posited that the currently available shots against the novel coronavirus not only “pose no greater threat to health than other medical prescriptions or procedures,” but that also “they clearly save lives.” Both assertions have been the subject of much scrutiny, however, and mounting evidence has come to light which undermines Klein’s conclusions.

For instance, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States continues to rack up injury reports in the days and weeks following injection with COVID jabs. The total number of adverse events recorded on the system now stands at 623,343 as of August 20. Over 55,000 of those led to hospitalization and 13,627 injuries resulted in death.

In fact, despite Klein’s assertion of lives being saved by vaccinating, Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., a renowned medical expert and member of the Truth for Health Foundation, said that “there is no product in human history that has ever created such a swathe of injuries to the public” as the COVID shots.

Of the numerous injuries reported following injection with the shots, McCullough noted that many of them “fall into very serious categories …. Over 12,000 certified deaths by the CDC, over 200,000 composite deaths, hospitalizations, urgent care visits, and office visits. A staggering number of myocardial infarctions, strokes, and over 4,000 cases of myocarditis, a heart inflammation in young individuals. Permanent damage to the neurologic systems, hematologic systems, immunologic systems.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1082040 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.


Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' -

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' -

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' -

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians -

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' -

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer vice-president and co-founder of Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics, slammed the jabs as “unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe,” explaining that the efficacy figures provided by the manufacturers cannot be guaranteed in the medium to long-term. Consequently, Yeadon stated that “urging vaccination to ‘protect others’ therefore has no basis in fact.”

Still, Klein asked: “How can so many American Christians not worry that they are committing one of our century’s greatest sins of omission” by refusing the jabs, leaning heavily on Pope Francis’ endorsement of vaccinating as “an act of love.”

Klein even took on the American pro-life movement, members of which have spoken out against the abortive elements tied up with the development and manufacture of the currently available, experimental shots and supported the right not to be coerced into vaccination.

The National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC), a Philadelphia-based pro-life organization dedicated to upholding “the dignity of the human person in health care and biomedical research,” has come out strongly against mandating the use of vaccines based on the Church’s own teaching.

Father Tad Pacholczyk, Director of Education at NCBC, told Raymond Arroyo during an August 19 interview that “[t]he Church has been clear that vaccination, as the rule, is not a moral obligation. It is something that needs to be voluntary.”

“Every individual needs to be, according to conscience, determining which medical interventions are, or are not, appropriate for their particular state in life,” Pacholzyk continued.

“So, when you have these blanket mandates, there is a lot of risk; there’s kind of a tendency to paint with too broad of a brush. And, you know, the effect here can be that individual liberty and individual assessment of circumstances are not respected,” he added.

Despite the measured messages of groups like the NCBC, the Kansas-based Klein alleged that the American pro-life movement might have “suffered its greatest setback when Catholics, who always spoke of protecting those most innocent and vulnerable, suddenly fell silent when it came to saving the lives of the poor, people of color, the aged, and those who cannot be vaccinated.”

“All of these,” he claimed, “are disproportionately dying because of our failure to vaccinate as an act of charity.” No evidence was provided to substantiate his claims.

Klein continued by denigrating the efforts of some prelates, such as those in Colorado, to promote the availability of exemptions to vaccine mandates for religious purposes, whom he said are “promoting abstract liberty over lifesaving charity.”

“Yes, civil liberties are a value, and that is why we have laws to protect them. Yet the pressing moral issue is that we are obligated to protect human life,” Klein vented.

The Catholic Church, through the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), teaches that “[p]ractical reason makes evident that vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary.” It further adds that “the morality of vaccination depends not only on the duty to protect one’s own health, but also on the duty to pursue the common good.”

Contrary to Klein’s assessment that refusing to take a COVID shot is the “ultimate sin of omission,” the Church has judged that Catholics must assess the matter according to their consciences without coercion and that, according to n. 1880 of The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a person must “always obey the certain judgement of his conscience.”

LifeSiteNews spoke with theologian and columnist Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, who described Klein’s characterization of COVID vaccine refusal as “the Gospel of social wokeness.”

“It’s absurd on the face of it to compare not getting an inadequately-tested, side-effect-inducing, aborted-fetal-cell-developed vaccine for a disease that cannot compare with any of the great epidemics of the past with omitting works of cardinal and theological virtues,” Kwasniewski said.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.