Featured Image
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick discusses the Women's Privacy Act.

AUSTIN, Texas, January 9, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Move over, North Carolina. The transgender battle is coming to Texas.

Republican Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announced legislation sponsored by State Senator Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham) that would require biological males to use the men's room and biological females to use the women's room in publicly-funded schools and government buildings.

The Women's Privacy Act is “the right thing to do,” said Patrick, who opposed same-sex “marriage” as a Texas legislator. “The people of Texas elected us to stand up for common sense, common decency and public safety.”

The apparent intent of Senate Bill 6 is to pre-empt proposed laws from gay activists that allow men into girls' and women's showers, locker rooms, toilets, and intimate facilities, justified by a self-chosen “gender identity.”

Not unexpectedly, the announcement raised protests at the capital from homosexuals. National News Watch reported that protesters carried signs against SB6 and interrupted the announcement with loud “boos.”  

Patrick said at a press conference that proponents realize it will be a politically incorrect and therefore a difficult battle, but the transgender agenda needs to be opposed. “We know it’s going to be a tough fight, but we're on the right side of the issue,” he said. “You can mark today as the day Texas is drawing a line in the sand and saying, 'No.'”

Organized LGBTQ activist groups and the ACLU of Texas have lambasted the proposed legislation as “invidious,” “discriminatory,” and bad for the Texas economy. They point to North Carolina's separate bathroom law, which was opposed by numerous corporations that pressured the state by withdrawing business, canceling expansion plans, and relocating lucrative sports championships outside the state.

One homosexual advocacy group called “Keep Texas Open for Business” released a study that claimed that Texas could lose from $964 million to $8.5 billion and from thousands to as many as 185,000 jobs over separate bathroom laws.

Patrick says the study is an exercise in “fear-mongering,” using “misinformation.”

Nevertheless, gay rights organization Human Rights Coalition (HRC) warned legislators, implying that they will lobby businesses to cripple Texas if it passes SB6. HRC president Chad Griffin accused Patrick and Sen. Kolkhorst of “want(ing) to throw away $8.5 billion in revenue from lost visitors, businesses, sports leagues, and major entertainment groups.”

Griffin and the HRC threatened the state. “If lawmakers vote to discriminate against transgender people, Texas will be closed for business.”

Patrick mockingly countered, “The economic doom? The Super Bowl is teed up for 5:30 p.m. on February 7.”

Meanwhile, conservative groups applauded the legislation. Liberty Counsel released a statement noting that SB 6 “would still allow for accommodations for so-called transgender students, such as single-stall restrooms on a case-by-case basis” and saying the bill would “protect women in public restrooms.”

“This issue is not about discrimination,” the Liberty Counsel statement read, “it's about public safety, protecting businesses and common sense.”

Political scuttlebutt is that the state Senate, which has a Republican majority, might very well pass the bill, but state House Speaker Joe Straus characterized the bill as not “the most urgent concern of mine.”  

As far as a gubernatorial veto, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remained noncommittal last month, saying the bill is “something that needs to be looked at.”

Besides North Carolina, two other states, Virginia and Kentucky, have proposed gender-separate bathroom legislation.

Texas successfully led 13 states in a lawsuit against the Obama administration forcing public schools to allow self-appointed “transgender” children to use the bathroom of the opposite sex.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.