News

WARWICKSHIRE, UK, November 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Thanks to her doctors’ ingenuity, a British mom facing the unfathomable choice of accepting life-saving radiation therapy or saving her baby’s life was able to do both.

Instead of facing the usual pressure to abort or allow her child to die, Sarah Best luckily found doctors both pioneering and willing to help save both her life and the life of her son.

Best was only four months pregnant when she was diagnosed with mouth cancer that required both radiation and chemotherapy, according to the Daily Mail. The drastic treatment became necessary when the cancer, much of which was removed by doctors as a tumor from her tongue, spread to her lymph nodes.

Image

Join a Facebook page to end abortion here

But the paper reports that thanks to a custom-built 1.5-ton shield of lead protecting her baby bump, Best has given birth to a healthy baby son – and has been declared cancer-free herself. Best gave birth to her son Jake immediately after her treatment, starting labor only minutes after finishing her last round of chemotherapy.

The mom said the outcome was “a huge relief.” “I just feel incredibly lucky that I was able to have the treatment,” she said.

Oncologist Dr Lydia Fresco, who helped design and build the four-inch-thick shield, told the Mail that the case was “extremely rare.”

“As far as published cases go she was the only woman in the world to have this combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy while pregnant,” said Fresco. “Because her cancer was highly aggressive it would have been much more likely to recur if she had not had the treatment. Radiotherapy is most effective for preventing cancer recurring six weeks after the tumour is removed, so we had to treat Sarah when we did.

“‘The lead shields were used to prevent any radiation from reaching the foetus and all the tests on Jake indicate that he is perfectly healthy.”

Read the full Daily Mail article here.

 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.