Featured Image

SIMI VALLEY, CA, September 17, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – While most of the the Republican presidential candidates defended Kim Davis' right to uphold her religious beliefs, one candidate likened her to officials in the Iranian government and said he'd put the Rowan County clerk in the unemployment line.

Former New York Gov. George Pataki had a heated exchange with former Sen. Rick Santorum, in which he said Kim Davis deserved to be fired – and if she worked in the Empire State during his three terms in office, he would have pulled the trigger himself.

“Yes, Kim Davis is different from Islamist radicalists from the Middle East,” he said. “But on the other hand, we have a rule in America” that elected officials must uphold “the rule of law.”

“I think she should have been fired, and if she worked for me, I would have fired her,” Pataki said. “There’s a place where religion supersedes the rule of law. It’s called Iran,” he added. “It shouldn’t be the United States.”

Santorum, an outspoken advocate of religious liberty, replied that Davis deserved an accommodation, and people of conscience should not be jailed for their views of marriage.

“We need a president who’s going to fight a court that is abusive, that has superseded their authority,” he said. “Judicial supremacy is not in the Constitution, and we need a president and a Congress to stand up to a court when it exceeds its constitutional authority.”

Moderator Jake Tapper allowed the exchange to carry on for a while. It took place during CNN's “undercard” debate of four lower-ranking presidential candidates – Pataki, Santorum, Lindsey Graham, and Bobby Jindal.

Pataki – who describes himself as “pro-choice” – responded, “My response is, kind of, 'Wow.' You know, we’re going to have a president who defies the Supreme Court because they don’t agree?”

“I hope so. If they’re wrong,” Santorum replied.

According to multiple presidential polls, Pataki is the lowest rated of all Republican presidential hopefuls, registering at zero percent.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.