News
Featured Image
 Liderina / Shutterstock.com

September 23, 2019 (Christian Institute) — Parents are celebrating after the Scottish Government officially announced the end of the intrusive Named Person scheme.

Three years after the Supreme Court ruled against key elements of the scheme in a case spearheaded by The Christian Institute, the Government has finally agreed to repeal the entire Named Person legislation.

Institute Director Colin Hart gave thanks to God for the result, saying it was parents — not the state — who were ultimately responsible for raising children.

READ: Parents challenge Scottish law naming gvmt officials to directly oversee every child in the country

'Happiness'

Under the original plans, every child in Scotland was to be assigned a “named person” — an employee of the state to oversee their 'wellbeing' or 'happiness'.

On September 19, Education Secretary John Swinney said the Government would repeal parts 4 and 5 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, bringing a formal end to the statutory scheme.

Mr Hart said: “Parents will be delighted and relieved at this news.”

Prayer

“For years we have said this scheme is wrong in principle. It is parents, rather than the state, who have the ultimate responsibility for raising children. The threshold for state intervention in the family has always been set high and it should remain that way. The Supreme Court underlined this in its ruling on the scheme.

“Some local authorities in Scotland may continue with something called a named person scheme, but it is legally toothless.

“We give thanks to God for this decision, and I want to thank all our supporters who have prayed and worked towards this day over the past five years.”

Human rights

The No to Named Persons campaign, which has worked tirelessly to raise awareness of the problems with the scheme, expressed delight.

“John Swinney has done the right thing, but not before time. We must not forget that this legislation breached the human rights of families.”

“The Government has spent years trying to resurrect the scheme after the Supreme Court issued its historic ruling.

“Ministers should have had the humility long before now to recognise, though they may have had good intentions, they got this scheme badly wrong.”

Published with permission from the Christian Institute.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...