News
Featured Image
Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies during a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing on Capitol Hill September 14, 2022 in Washington, DC. Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky this week promised White House COVID czar Dr. Anthony Fauci that Republicans would investigate whether FDA officials on vaccine committees have gotten payouts from pharmaceutical companies, presenting a potential conflict of interest.

Sen. Paul made the comments during a Wednesday Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee meeting at which Dr. Fauci testified.

“We’ve been asking you, and you refuse to answer, whether anybody on the vaccine committees gets royalties from the pharmaceutical companies,” Sen. Paul said to Fauci. “I asked you last time and what was your response? ‘We don’t have to tell you.’”

The Kentucky senator said Fauci again thwarted his efforts to obtain the information after he filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

“But I’ll tell you this, when we get in charge, we’re gonna change the rules and you will have to divulge where you get your royalties from, from what companies, and if anybody on the committee has a conflict of interest,” said Paul, who has repeatedly grilled Dr. Fauci on a range of COVID-related issues, including U.S. funding for gain of function research in Wuhan, China, the importance of natural immunity, and the necessity of masking.

“We’re gonna learn about it,” he said. I promise you that.”

Paul previously brought up the prospect of royalties payments in June, telling Fauci that according to heavily-redacted documents obtained through a watchdog group’s FOIA request, 18,000 National Institutes of Health (NIH) employees received $193 million in the form of 27,000 royalties payments from third parties between 2010 and 2016, KATV reported.

“Can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants?” Paul asked.

Fauci told Paul he didn’t know, but that he doubted it.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Republican Senators: Defend natural marriage!
  Show Petition Text
8532 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

We need YOU to be a voice for natural marriage and the constitutional freedom of individual states by SIGNING and SHARING this petition calling on Republican U.S. Senators to oppose the deceitfully named "Respect for Marriage Act!"

Leftist members of Congress have, once again, opted to ignore the myriad of issues facing our country — be it the border crisis, gas prices, inflation, crime, and more — to instead virtue-signal by introducing their radical new bill, the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act," which, among other things, would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.

And with the radical left continuing its attempts to redefine words, people, and events to better suit their agenda and advance their political narratives, it should come as no surprise that their latest target happens to be natural marriage.

But marriage is not a political tool for the left to manipulate and destroy; it is the key building block of our society, and the primary basis for the safe, responsible upbringing of our children.

Republican members of the U.S. Senate still have a chance to defend natural marriage by stopping this bill from becoming law, but we need to let them know that the American people oppose the left's seemingly never-ending efforts to degrade the sanctity of marriage.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to Republican members of the U.S. Senate, insisting that they vote against the "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for any form of vote.
 


The legislation in question, formally filed as H.R.8404 and sponsored by liberal New York Congressman Jerry Nadler, would codify same-sex marriage into federal law, effectively forcing states to recognize any marriage performed in another state regardless of laws on their own books.

It would also fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was signed by President Clinton back in 1996 and formally defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman under federal law.

With the fall of Roe v. Wade back in June, the left's paranoia about losing ground when it comes to their radical social and political agenda has reached a fever pitch, resulting in the ongoing push for the "Respect for Marriage Act," which, if we don't act soon, may well become law...

TIME IS RUNNING OUT: With a 50-50 Senate, the left needs just TEN Republican members to bow to pressure: the mainstream media, Big Tech, Hollywood, and the university system are all fighting against us. With so much pressure against conservatives, we need you to send these Senators a powerful message demanding that they stand strong against the left.

That's why we need your help now.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to Republican U.S. Senators across the country, urging them to stand against the left's attempts to reinvent marriage by opposing the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for a vote.

Protect natural marriage! Protect the freedoms of individual states!

Put Republican U.S. Senators on notice and let them know that you're watching closely how they vote on the "Respect for Marriage Act."

Thank you!

 

  Hide Petition Text

Paul’s comments Wednesday came not long after Fauci announced he would step down from his role as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a branch of the NIH, by the end of U.S. President Joe Biden’s term. Fauci later said he would actually step down in December of this year.

Fauci has stated he’s not leaving his role to try to dodge investigations after the GOP retakes power after the November midterm elections, but suggested that Republicans might be less likely to “​​come after me” if he wasn’t “in the job.”

In August, Paul affirmed that Fauci wouldn’t save himself from GOP investigations just by removing himself from his NIAID role.

“Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic,” Paul said in an August 22 tweet. “He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak.”

Meanwhile, Paul isn’t alone in threatening to take action against Fauci, who was subpoenaed in July in connection with a social media collusion lawsuit brought by the Republican Attorneys General of Louisiana and Missouri.

The lawsuit, led by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, alleges that Fauci and other high-ranking officials in the Biden White House (including Biden himself) conspired to suppress content deemed “misinformation” regarding COVID-19.

Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled that Fauci must turn over his communications with Big Tech companies as the legal action proceeds. White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and specific Department of Health and Human Services officials were ordered to do the same.

READ: Fauci among gov’t officials who must hand over Big Tech censorship emails

Echoing Sen. Paul, AG Landry said this week that Fauci won’t evade investigation by simply stepping down.

“I can promise you retirement is not going to save [Fauci] from us,” Landry told the John Solomon Reports podcast Tuesday, adding he wants “to know everything that Dr. Fauci hid from the American people.”

“I think that this is one of the most important cases that I believe eventually will make it up to the Supreme Court in over 100 years,” Landry said.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

5 Comments

    Loading...