KENOSHA, Wisconsin (LifeSiteNews) — Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson last week reaffirmed his hesitation regarding the controversial efforts to codify gay marriage into federal law, arguing the legislation is “completely unnecessary.”
During a stop at the Kenosha County Fair last week, the Wisconsin lawmaker argued that efforts to enshrine gay marriage in federal law weren’t needed since Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court precedent that forced all 50 states to recognize the unions, would “never be overturned,” Newsweek reported.
Sen. Johnson has generated support from the right for challenging the COVID-19 response, raising the alarm about the Biden family’s business dealings with China, and maintaining a 100% pro-life voting record. However, he recently alarmed conservatives when he said in July he wouldn’t oppose the pro-gay marriage “Respect for Marriage” bill, which was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last month.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) tells WISN-TV that a bill to protect same-sex marriage is “completely unnecessary” because “the decision on gay marriage will never be overturned” and precedent is “decisive.”
He says it differs from Dobbs because “it would impact millions of people.” pic.twitter.com/0IG2VKsZxQ
— Heartland Signal (@HeartlandSignal) August 22, 2022
In a July 21 statement to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Johnson said he thought it unlikely the Supreme Court would overturn precedent on gay marriage, and characterized the bill as “another example of Democrats creating a state of fear over an issue in order to further divide Americans for their political benefit.”
“[E]ven though I feel the Respect for Marriage Act is unnecessary, should it come before the Senate, I see no reason to oppose it,” Johnson said at the time.
The Wisconsin Republican appears to be distancing himself from the measure in more recent statements, however, as Democrats push to get the bill past the Senate ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.
We need YOU to be a voice for natural marriage and the constitutional freedom of individual states by SIGNING and SHARING this petition calling on Republican U.S. Senators to oppose the deceitfully named "Respect for Marriage Act!"
Leftist members of Congress have, once again, opted to ignore the myriad of issues facing our country — be it the border crisis, gas prices, inflation, crime, and more — to instead virtue-signal by introducing their radical new bill, the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act," which, among other things, would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.
And with the radical left continuing its attempts to redefine words, people, and events to better suit their agenda and advance their political narratives, it should come as no surprise that their latest target happens to be natural marriage.
But marriage is not a political tool for the left to manipulate and destroy; it is the key building block of our society, and the primary basis for the safe, responsible upbringing of our children.
Republican members of the U.S. Senate still have a chance to defend natural marriage by stopping this bill from becoming law, but we need to let them know that the American people oppose the left's seemingly never-ending efforts to degrade the sanctity of marriage.
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to Republican members of the U.S. Senate, insisting that they vote against the "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for any form of vote.
House Freedom Caucus urges Senate to oppose the "Respect for Marriage Act": pic.twitter.com/jjARSGI94Y— House Freedom Caucus (@freedomcaucus) July 22, 2022
The legislation in question, formally filed as H.R.8404 and sponsored by liberal New York Congressman Jerry Nadler, would codify same-sex marriage into federal law, effectively forcing states to recognize any marriage performed in another state regardless of laws on their own books.
It would also fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was signed by President Clinton back in 1996 and formally defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman under federal law.
With the fall of Roe v. Wade back in June, the left's paranoia about losing ground when it comes to their radical social and political agenda has reached a fever pitch, resulting in the ongoing push for the "Respect for Marriage Act," which, if we don't act soon, may well become law...
TIME IS RUNNING OUT: With a 50-50 Senate, the left needs just TEN Republican members to bow to pressure: the mainstream media, Big Tech, Hollywood, and the university system are all fighting against us. With so much pressure against conservatives, we need you to send these Senators a powerful message demanding that they stand strong against the left.
That's why we need your help now.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to Republican U.S. Senators across the country, urging them to stand against the left's attempts to reinvent marriage by opposing the so-called "Respect for Marriage Act" when it comes before them for a vote.
Protect natural marriage! Protect the freedoms of individual states!
Put Republican U.S. Senators on notice and let them know that you're watching closely how they vote on the "Respect for Marriage Act."
Newsweek pointed out that in a separate statement to Axios earlier this month, Johnson clarified he wasn’t committed to voting for the bill.
“I’ve never said I would support it,” he told Axios. “I said I didn’t see a reason to oppose it.”
On Monday, Politico observed that Johnson, who is up for re-election in November, is now joining fellow Senate Republicans in pushing for the bill to be amended before committing to supporting it.
“During the time he’s been back in Wisconsin over recess, he has spoken with a number of constituents who have concerns about the bill and the risk it may pose to religious liberty,” Johnson spokesperson Alexa Henning told Politico this week. “He is working with other senators on an amendment to try and remedy those concerns.”
Last week, Johnson told WISN-TV that he’s working on an amendment to address religious liberty protections in relation to the bill in hopes it could “fix” what he called a “legitimate concern” regarding the effects of the legislation.
The measure in question, HR 8404, would federally recognize the union between two men or two women as “marriage,” and even compel the federal government to recognize polygamy if approved by any state.
It’s unclear whether Democrats will scrape up enough Republican support to pass the bill in the divided U.S. Senate.
In July, just five Republican senators publicly committed to or implied supporting the bill, half the number needed by Democrats to clear the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold.
To date, most Republicans have kept their voting plans close to the vest. However, Axios reported that the bill’s sponsors, Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin and Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins, are collaborating in a bid to “build more support with Republicans,” Baldwin’s office told the outlet.
According to the report, Collins and Baldwin are hashing out plans to provide “more clarity that the legislation would not take away any religious liberty or conscience protections.”
Scoop: Senators are discussing changes to the gay marriage bill – to clarify that it wouldn’t infringe on religious liberty – in order to get 10 Republicans on board. https://t.co/AdFFTK5Azm
— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) August 3, 2022
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee is drafting his own amendment, which his office said would specifically bar “the federal government from discriminating against persons based on their sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions about marriage,” Politico noted.
The bill, which gained 47 Republican votes in the House last month, has drawn criticism from conservatives who argue the codification of gay and polygamous marriage cannot help but run afoul of many Americans’ moral and religious convictions.
Last month, LifeSite’s Calvin Freiburger pointed out that there “is a direct causal line from surrendering marriage to the following years’ assaults on religious liberty and today’s all-out war on gender distinctions.”
“‘Sex doesn’t matter to marriage’ was the starting point on the path to ‘sex doesn’t matter to anything,’ and cutting children’s best interests out of society’s understanding of marriage was a predictable precursor to pursuing adult gratification at the expense of child welfare in even more destructive ways,” he wrote.