July 26, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In a closed-door session July 21 the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) voted to approve new language in its annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which, if passed, will require women to register for the draft.
According to a report by The Hill, the change to the crucial military defense bill “amends the Military Selective Service Act to require the registration of women for Selective Service,” per a Thursday summary.
ABC reports that the amended NDAA was approved by the SASC by a vote of 23-2.
Per previous LifeSite reporting, the news comes just days after a July 19 report which suggested Democrats in the Senate were looking at adding the new language, which eliminates any reference to men and instead mandates that “all Americans” between the ages of 18 and 26 sign up for military selective service.
The alteration in the language was made by Senate Armed Services Chair Jack Reed, who wrote the draft of the proposed changes which were approved behind closed doors last week.
PETITION UPDATE (12/14/2020) -
The vaccine roll out is beginning in the United States, and first responders have been tagged as those likely to be among the first to receive a vaccine.
President Trump needs to ensure that this is entirely voluntary.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition, today!
Early reports suggest that the U.S. military could be first on the list of those ordered to take a COVID vaccine.
But, no one should be forced to be vaccinated against his or her will, especially members of the U.S. military!
Military men and women, and their families, already sacrifice enough for the safety of our country. Forcing them to take an untested and unproven vaccine, against their will, would violate the spirit of their contract with America.
This petition says 'No' to treating our servicemen and women like guinea pigs with an unproven and insufficiently-tested vaccine.
Please SIGN this petition to President Trump asking him to declare, as Commander-in-Chief, that members of the armed forces will not be forced to take any COVID vaccine.
So far, big pharmaceutical companies have reported casualties and halted trials for a COVID vaccine on numerous occasions:
- An AstraZeneca COVID trial participant died over the summer.
- On October 12, Eli Lilly stopped a COVID antibody trial because of safety concerns.
- Johnson and Johnson paused their vaccine trials on October 11 because one participant had an "unexplained" illness.
- And, other AstraZeneca trials in the UK were put on hold both in July and September after participants developed a "serious neurological condition that might have been caused by the vaccine."
No one, especially in the U.S. military, should be used as a guinea pig for proving the "effectiveness" of any COVID vaccine.
Apart from these real health concerns, many military men and women object to vaccines made from aborted fetal cell lines and to other unethical testing, and these ethical considerations should also be honored.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition which calls on President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, to issue a declaration protecting the right of servicemen and women to exercise conscientious objection in relation to a mandate for them to take a COVID vaccine.
Just like it was essential for President Trump to nominate a new Supreme Court justice before the election, it is now essential that the President declare any vaccine to be voluntary for the military before January, just in case there is a transition to a new administration.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition to President Trump, today!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Why rushing a COVID vaccine will likely fail to provide a safe and effective immunity' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/why-rushing-a-covid-vaccine-will-likely-fail-to-provide-a-safe-and-effective-immunity
'Coronavirus vaccine trial volunteer dies in Brazil' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-vaccine-trial-volunteer-dies-in-brazil
**Photo Credit: David Dee Delgado/Getty Images
To date, men who fail to register for the draft face fines of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years. Men who do not register are also refused federal financial aid and federal jobs. Women would be subject to the same penalties if the NDAA passes with its current amended language.
Amid the opening up of military combat roles for women, the question of requiring young women to register for the draft has been frequently raised, particularly in the past five years .
But the push to force women to register to be drafted into the military has raised the ire of many on both sides of the political aisle.
Pro-life Missouri senator Josh Hawley tweeted out July 23 “I voted against forcing women to enter the draft, and here’s why. American women have heroically served in and alongside our fighting forces since our nation’s founding.”
“It’s one thing to allow American women to choose this service,” Hawley added, “but it’s quite another to force it upon our daughters, sisters, and wives. Missourians feel strongly that compelling women to fight our wars is wrong and so do I.”
It’s one thing to allow American women to choose this service, but it’s quite another to force it upon our daughters, sisters, and wives. Missourians feel strongly that compelling women to fight our wars is wrong and so do I
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) July 23, 2021
DeFazio joined several other senators, including Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), in signing the bi-partisan legislative proposal S 11394, known as the “Selective Service Repeal Act of 2021.”
“It’s time to end military draft registration altogether, not expand it,” DeFazio wrote. “I joined @RodneyDavis @RonWyden & @RandPaul in urging the House Armed Services Committee to scrap this expensive, punitive, needless bureaucracy in the upcoming FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act.”
It’s time to end military draft registration altogether, not expand it. I joined @RodneyDavis @RonWyden & @RandPaul in urging the House Armed Services Committee to scrap this expensive, punitive, needless bureaucracy in the upcoming FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act. pic.twitter.com/zwXwcqNV7S
Last week, several interest groups penned a letter addressed to the SASC, appealing to the committee to adopt S 11394 “as an amendment to the NDAA” and to reject “[a]ny provision to extend Selective Service to women,” citing “freedom of religion and belief, civil and human rights, the rule of law, and equality for all.”
The letter’s authors claim that “[t]he argument that extending the registration requirement to women is a way to help reduce gender-based discrimination is specious.”
To date S 11394 has been referred to the Committee on Armed Services but has not progressed beyond that.
If the altered NDAA progresses with its current gender-neutral language, women would be required to register for the draft as soon as one year after the new law is enacted, according to ABC.