Help Canadian Dad who was fired for refusing vax: LifeFunder
DAVOS, Switzerland (LifeSiteNews) — George Soros, a globalist and billionaire funder of radical leftists, yesterday declared that COVID-19 has helped “legitimize” control methods enabled by artificial intelligence (AI).
Soros’ comment came during remarks delivered at the 2022 World Economic Forum (WEF) annual Davos summit, as he touched on the danger he said AI poses to free societies.
Soros declared that “Repressive regimes are now in the ascendant and open societies are under siege,” and pointed to the countries he said he believes pose “the greatest threat to open society” today: China and Russia.
“I have pondered long and hard why that should have happened. I found part of the answer in the rapid development of digital technology, especially artificial intelligence,” continued Soros, who has had several editorials published by the WEF.
“In theory, AI ought to be politically neutral: it can be used for good or bad. But in practice the effect is asymmetric. AI is particularly good at producing instruments of control that help repressive regimes and endanger open societies,” he went on, adding, “Covid-19 also helped legitimize instruments of control because they are really useful in dealing with the virus.”
The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response.
But it's not too late to do something about it.
SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.
The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level.
194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.
This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations.
SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.
Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."
Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.
The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”
The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO.
Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.
These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed.
SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty
The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read.
"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive.
"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic.
"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.
SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.
These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights.
We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.
Sign the petition - speak up now!
For More Information:
Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews
Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews
**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**
Indeed, not only nations ordinarily considered “repressive,” but the majority of countries across the globe had become “closed” to various degrees during the COVID-19 outbreak, with countries like France and Canada, for example, both led by WEF Young Global Leaders, implementing COVID passports to control access to public venues, and restricting international travel.
In fact, under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Canada continues to enforce some of the most stringent international travel controls in the world, even as U.S. health professionals, for example, widely acknowledge that COVID-19 is becoming “more and more like the common cold.”
Catholic Family News editor Matt Gaspers called Soros’ admission that COVID-19 helped facilitate greater control “interesting,” but added, “he’s wrong about ‘instruments of control’ being effective for ‘dealing with the virus, noting, “Lockdowns don’t work.”
Soros himself has also furthered the restriction of freedoms in the name of COVID-19 and other social causes through his Open Society Foundations network. Last September, the American Civil Liberties Union, which received over $37 million from Soros between 2000 and 2014 alone, said mandatory COVID injections will “further civil liberties.”
Yuval Noah Harari, an adviser to WEF founder and chairman Klaus Schwab, has called the outbreak of COVID-19 “a kind of watershed event for surveillance,” not just because surveillance is “spreading everywhere with the disease” but because it is being implemented “under the skin,” that is, it is literally monitoring our internal physical state and health status.
The “instruments of control” that, according to Soros, are enabled by AI and “legitimized” by COVID-19 facilitate what Harari calls “digital dictatorships.”
“Dictators always dreamt about completely eliminating privacy, monitoring everybody all the time and knowing everything you do, and not just everything you do, but even everything you think and everything you feel … They could never do it because it was technically impossible; now it’s possible,” Harari explained to New York Times moderator Liz Alderman during the Athens Democracy Forum, in a now-viral video.
The WEF not only supports widespread surveillance in the name of COVID — endorsing, for example, track-and-trace apps in order to “isolate infected persons from the uninfected” — but asks how governments can “enable the healthcare system” to use digital contract tracing “beyond COVID-19.”
The question for Soros, the WEF, and the group’s associates remains: Where do they draw the line between “repressive” controls and “beneficial” ones?
Help Canadian Dad who was fired for refusing vax: LifeFunder