News
Featured Image
Two pro-life women stand in support of higher standards for abortion clinic safety in front of a group of pro-abortion protestors.

SOUTH CAROLINA, October 21, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) is walking back suggestions it made last month that fathers of pre-born children consent for their mothers to abort them.

The proposed regulations would possibly update abortion accident reporting requirements, requirements for abortion licensure, “complaint reporting, patient rights, infection control,” “record maintenance,” and “fire and life safety requirements,” according to the SCDHEC, which is accepting public comment on the proposal.

However, the SCDHEC told local media that it was wrong to suggest that fathers consent to the abortion of their babies. The suggestion is no longer part of the proposed rules.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic’s Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said that the proposed health and safety regulations are “extreme” and “medically unnecessary.”

“Restrictions like requiring husband’s consent, admitting privileges, denying minors’ judicial bypass[,] and mandating surgical-facility requirements are all blatantly unconstitutional,” she said in a statement. “These restrictions…are intended to shame women.”

The proposed regulations will be the subject of a December public hearing.

South Carolina law indicates that married women who live with their husbands and are seeking third trimester, late-term abortions must have their husband’s consent.

The 1992 Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey upheld certain abortion restrictions, like 24-hour waiting periods and parental consent, but said that requiring spousal notification placed an “undue burden” on women.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.