Featured Image

COLUMBIA, South Carolina, October 10, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – The South Carolina House of Representatives has voted to uphold Republican Gov. Henry McMaster’s line-item veto of millions in federal “family planning” funds, preventing a portion of that money from going to abortion facilities.

In July, McMaster used his line-item veto to strip about $15.8 million in “family planning” dollars from the $8 billion budget, some of which would have gone to facilities involved in abortions and about $100,000 specifically to Planned Parenthood locations. He also issued an executive order disqualifying abortion facilities as Medicaid providers.

“There are a variety of agencies, clinics, and medical entities in South Carolina that receive taxpayer funding to offer important women's health and family planning services without offering abortions,” he explained at the time. Abortion supporters objected that the move would also affect clinics that weren’t involved in abortions, but McMaster ordered that non-abortion family planning services continue to be supported with state rather than federal money.

Last week, Greenville News reports, the state House voted 77-31 to uphold his veto, which covered a combination of just under $14 million in federal funds and about $2.2 million in state money. As a result, the state health department will cover non-abortion family planning services out of its $231 million reserve fund.

“The governor has taken decisive steps to ensure that every family-planning provider in this state that does not provide abortions can keep their funding,” McMaster spokesman Brian Symmes says.

Democrats and abortion advocates denounced the vote. Rep. James Smith, who is running against McMaster for governor, accused him of “playing with the lives of thousands of South Carolinians who need access to family-planning services.” Planned Parenthood Votes South Atlantic spokeswoman Vicki Ringer claimed the veto punishes people who come to the abortion giant “for quality health care” rather than “to make a political statement.”

Abortion advocates insist that tax dollars to abortion-involved facilities for other purposes don’t support abortions, but pro-lifers warn that such subsidies ultimately enable abortion groups to commit more abortions by freeing up money from their other revenue services. Duke University healthcare analyst Chris Conover estimated in 2015 that taxpayers ultimately cover almost 25% of all abortion costs.

Additionally, legitimate providers of women’s health services dwarf abortion-involved facilities across the country. As of 2015, federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics outnumbered Planned Parenthood facilities 268 to 2 in South Carolina. Today, Planned Parenthood still has just two locations in the Palmetto state. lists a total of four abortion centers in South Carolina.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic is also suing to block the order excluding it from Medicaid. The state is currently appealing a judge’s preliminary injunction against the order, with Symmes saying that McMaster vows to “fight the lawsuit as hard as he can because he doesn’t think taxpayer money should go to anyone who provides abortions.”

“We commend Gov. McMaster for not only keeping his promise to protect innocent human life in South Carolina but also keeping his promise to taxpayers of South Carolina who should not be forced to fund agencies that destroy human life,” South Carolina Citizens for Life president Lisa Van Riper said. “Abortion is not health care. Abortion is an act of violence that kills an unborn member of our human family.”


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.