Hundreds of pro-life student groups sweeping across U.S. college campuses
December 9, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In 1996 a sobering Gallup Poll was released that confirmed what many pro-life activists already suspected, but nevertheless hoped wasn’t true: while 47% of women said they were pro-life when they entered college, by graduation, a whopping 73% said they were now pro-choice.
Frighteningly, the pro-life movement was losing 26% of all female students who went through a university program. Clearly, if the movement had any hope of survival in the long run, more needed to be done to reach out to students.
At that time there already existed a group whose mission was to create a pro-life presence on campuses - American Collegians for Life. But without a full-time staff, and without a significant source of funding, there was only so much that the Collegians for Life, which was entirely student-run, could do.
In 2006, all of that changed. In that year American Collegians for Life received a sizable start-up grant, changed its name to Students for Life of America (SFLA), hired a professional staff, opened its first national headquarters in Arlington, VA, and launched its historic Pro-Life Field Program.
Since then, Students for Life has gone on to become one of the most active, and most successful, pro-life organizations in the country.
Meet SFLA executive director Kristan Hawkins
In fact, says Kristan Hawkins, SFLA’s first executive director, their organization has been so successful in founding pro-life student groups, that they have far surpassed anti-life organizations in establishing a campus presence. When Students for Life launched in 2006, there were only about 180 pro-life college student groups in the whole of the United States. Now there are over 500, and more are being added every day.
Amazingly, Hawkins was handed the helm of the newly-minted national pro-life organization at the tender age of 21. She describes the process of getting SFLA off the ground as being akin to starting up a small business – interviewing and hiring staff, opening an office, doing the accounting, and developing all of SFLA’s programs from the ground up.
She describes that time as “really exciting,” but jokes that, “had I known how much work it was going to be, I probably would have given it a second thought instead of immediately saying, ‘Yes, I’ll take it!’” And for her, things have only gotten busier over the years, now that she is married and has two children.
But, she says, the hard work has clearly paid off. In the past five years, SFLA has grown to ten full-time and 2 part-time staff. Every year SFLA hosts a conference in Washington to coincide with the annual March for Life – this year they are expecting a record-breaking 1800 youth attendees, making it “the largest pro-life youth conference in the world.”
And then, of course, there is the core of SFLA’s outreach - those 530-plus SFLA-affiliated pro-life campus groups. That might sound like a lot, but for Hawkins it’s only the beginning – the goal is to reach at least 1,000.
It’s all part of an effort to build up what she terms a “critical mass,” in preparation for the day when Roe v. Wade is overturned.
She points out that, “when that glorious day comes,” there will be 50 statewide battles in the United States over abortion that will “need trained activists in the states.” Hawkins hopes these activists will be SFLA alumni.
“They’ve been trained, they know exactly what works and what doesn’t work,” she says. “They’re already ready. They’re on the ground, they’re in the states.”
Campuses: Ground Zero of the abortion fight
Hawkins argues that an organization that focuses exclusively on students, and especially college campuses, is crucial because “this is where these girls are having the abortions, this is where Planned Parenthood is targeting for new business, and this is where hearts and minds are being changed.”
The power of SFLA’s presence was illustrated in an amazing way just this week. Steve Macias, one of SFLA’s field agents, was on the campus of Sacramento City College gathering information when he went up to a passing student and asked her what she knew about abortion. She turned to him in amazement and asked how he “knew.”
When he assured her that he knew nothing at all about her, she explained that she was being pressured by her boyfriend to abort their unborn child, even though she knew abortion was wrong. Thankfully, Steve was able to put the girl in touch with a local pregnancy resource center and put her on the path to saving the life of her child.
But it isn’t always that easy. SFLA has found over the years that their deadliest enemy isn’t necessarily pro-abortion activists, but rather, “apathy.”
Hawkins says her field agents frequently encounter students who say they are pro-life, “but are unwilling to take a stand.” She attributes this to the fact that students are “inundated with so much information and media” that they begin to grow numb. “It’s funny, because even now you’ll show people a graphic image of an aborted baby, and we have some people who’ll just look right at it and walk the other way. It doesn’t really affect them,” she said.
Nevertheless, Hawkins says she holds a great deal of hope for the future: increasingly, she says, “this generation sees abortion as a human rights issue.” Part of this is thanks to pro-life parents, raising children who understand the value of human life. Part is thanks to advances in technology.
“You’ve got 3D and 4D ultrasounds now, something we’ve never had before in previous generations - where a girl can go to Google, type in abortion and see that baby in the womb,” said Hawkins. These technologies are educating students “about what is life, and they’re showing these students that there’s unborn life in that womb.”
Hawkins is convinced that right now “the momentum is on our side.”
For veteran pro-life activists, organizations like SFLA are the answer to their most earnest prayers. No longer do they need to worry about whether or not there will be anyone to fill their shoes when they are gone. Thanks to SFLA, and other similar organizations, there is a whole new generation of smart, savvy, devoted, and energetic pro-life activists.
And they are striking fear into the heart of the old guard of the pro-abortion movement. When Nancy Keenan of NARAL, one of America’s top pro-abort organizations, stumbled on the March for Life in Washington last January, she told Newsweek: “I just thought, my gosh, they are so young … There are so many of them, and they are so young.”
SFLA is at the forefront in pioneering techniques that allow them to reach out directly to this new generation of pro-life warriors. “We use a lot of social media,” Hawkins explains. “I think we were one of the first pro-life organization back in ’06 to utilize the power of Facebook to find pro-life students, or students who we think should identify with the pro-life message.”
The SFLA website is also one of the most cutting edge in the pro-life movement – packed with well-organized, crisply presented information.
You could call it pro-life 2.0.
But at the same time, says Hawkins, there is no replacement for the tried and true methods of boots-to-the-ground outreach.
“You can do a lot via the Internet. You can do a lot via referrals and e-mail and calls,” she says. “But really a lot of grunt work comes down to hitting the pavement, being there in person, right on the campus meeting the students. I think that that’s actually one of the most critical things that you have to do. Students are swamped with messages, e-mails, text message. Getting out and personally meeting these students, I think that’s the best thing that you can do.”
And this is exactly what Students for Life of America does best.
To those pro-life students who feel alienated on their college campus, she says, “don’t be discouraged.”
“We are the majority. National polls are telling this,” said Hawkins. But for those students who don’t believe her, she encourages them to come to the SFLA conference in Washington in January, “where I’m sure every single student will leave knowing that we are the majority and that we will be victorious.”
Do you have an idea for a Culture of Life story? If so, let us know here!
Visit the Students for Life of America blog on LifeSiteNews here.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
Pro-life group asks: Pray for abortionists who sell baby body parts
February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - This Lent, a pro-life group would like you to pray for an abortionist - specifically, an abortionist who facilitates the sale of unborn babies' body parts.
The Pro-Life Action League is asking for people to pray for three people in particular throughout the 40 days of Lent. All three were caught on video by the Center for Medical Progress.
Dr. Deborah Nucatola appeared in the first video released last July, sipping red wine and stabbing her salad as she discussed the dismemberment of aborted children, including where to “crush” their bodies for a "less crunchy" technique.
The second is Dr. Mary Gatter, who appeared in the second undercover video, haggling over the prices Planned Parenthood expected to receive for the aborted children's organs and tissue. At one point, she joked that she wants the revenue to pay for “a Lamborghini.”
And the third is Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards, who was also caught in the first video praising Dr. Nucatola.
Despite the shocking evidence uncovered by CMP, Richards has insisted her organization did not receive any profit for what she dubs its "fetal tissue donation program." She apologized only for Dr. Nucatola's "tone." She has since said that Planned Parenthood will not receive any remuneration for babies' body parts.
"These three architects of Planned Parenthood’s baby parts scheme have devoted their lives to the destruction and exploitation of human life in the name of ‘choice,’" said Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League. "If we won’t pray for them, who will?”
He asked Christians to pray for these three abortion industry profiteers - and for Richards, who is a post-abortive woman - in order to fulfill Jesus Christ's commandment in the Bible, “Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you” (St. Matthew 5:44).
“In God’s eyes, what abortion has done to these three women may be worse than what they’ve done to unborn children, who now rest in our Lord’s loving arms," Scheidler said.
For most Catholics, Lent began yesterday on Ash Wednesday, and lasts 40 days.
Texas AG faces ethics probe for defending conscience rights of natural marriage supporters
AUSTIN, Texas, February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – The attorney general of the state of Texas is facing an ethics investigation for having affirmed the constitutional religious freedom of state workers to decline to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if it goes against their religious beliefs.
Attorney General Ken Paxton took steps to address the issue of conscience protection in his state before and after last June's Supreme Court's Obergefell decision imposing same-sex "marriage" on all 50 states, first issuing a statement the day prior clarifying that Texas law recognizes the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman and recommending that state officials wait for direction from his office should the High Court move to redefine marriage.
Paxton then issued a statement two days after the ruling, his office allowing county clerks and their employees to retain religious freedoms that may allow accommodation of their religious objections to issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and said as well that justices of the peace and judges would similarly retain religious freedoms.
Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.
A month later, a group of some 200 attorneys filed a complaint asserting that Paxton's position encouraged officials to violate the U.S. Constitution and break their oaths of office, according to ABC News.
The complaint was dismissed at first by the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas, but it was reinstated February 2 by a state Supreme Court-appointed appeals board, which contended that the complaint alleges a "possible violation" of professional conduct rules.
The appeals board decision to reinstate the case does not mean Paxton violated professional ethics, according to the ABC report, but does require him to respond to the complaint in conjunction with the investigation.
"The complaint has always lacked merit," said Paxton spokeswoman Cynthia Meyer, "and we are confident the legal process for resolving these complaints will bear that out."
Paxton was among several state officials across the U.S. who moved to ensure conscience protection in the immediate aftermath the Obergefell ruling, at times garnering the ire of homosexual activists.
Last July, South Dakota's attorney general granted permission to county clerks with conscientious objections to opt out of issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples as long as another clerk in the office would issue the license.
In a highly contentious case, Davis had asked for a religious accommodation allowing her office to issue altered licenses to homosexuals without her name on them, which was eventually granted by Kentucky's Governor Matt Bevin. However, the ACLU sued, seeking to force Davis to issue the old forms with her full name on them. A federal judge rejected the suit earlier this week.
Last year, homosexual activists sent harassing messages, including threats of violence, to Oklahoma State Senator Joseph Silk and his family after the Republican legislator sponsored a bill that would have given the state's business owners the freedom to follow their religious convictions in regard to homosexual "marriage."
Paxton faces penalties varying between a reprimand and disbarment resulting from the ethics complaint. The Texas attorney general is also facing securities fraud charges.
This pro-abortion billionaire may run for president
NEW YORK, February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - He's an upwardly mobile, socially liberal billionaire whose political affiliation has changed numerous times over the years. He's teased numerous presidential campaigns in the past, but this time he's talking like he's serious. And no, he's not who you think he is.
Michael Bloomberg, who served three terms as mayor of New York City, has confirmed to media sources that he is considering running for president as an independent in 2016.
Bloomberg told told the Financial Times this week that he finds American political "discourse and discussion distressingly banal and an outrage and an insult to the voters," and that he's “looking at all the options."
The 73-year-old tycoon was a registered Democrat before switching parties to run in the less contested Republican primary in 2001. He became a registered independent in 2007.
As mayor, Bloomberg governed as a social liberal who strongly supported abortion and the LGBT political agenda.
In 2011, Bloomberg signed a controversial gag order directed at crisis pregnancy centers. A year later, he endorsed Barack Obama's re-election, saying that abortion-on-demand is part of "the world I want to leave my two daughters, and the values that are required to guide us there."
That's the same year Bloomberg Philanthropies announced a $50 million undertaking to expand "reproductive health," including a major partnership with Planned Parenthood-Global to overturn pro-life laws in four nations: Nicaragua, Sengal, Uganda, and Burkina Faso.
Mayor Bloomberg played a pivotal role redefining marriage in New York state, giving the four Republican state senators who voted for New York’s same-sex “marriage” bill the maximum campaign contribution allowed by law. One retired and a second lost his primary fight.
His strong emphasis on health regulations, such as attempting to ban soft drinks larger than 16 ounces, did little to enhance his popularity and were deftly parodied by Sarah Palin. (A state court struck down the proposed regulation.)
The financial heft he could bring into the race, as well as his quirky politics, has tempted Bloomberg to enter presidential politics in the past. He considered a presidential run in 2008 and thought more strongly about a third party bid in 2012, after hosting the inaugural convention of the “No Labels” movement in New York City in 2010, but he backed off each time after not seeing a viable path to victory.
With an estimated fortune of $39 billion, he has said he would be willing to spend more than $1 billion on his campaign in 2016 - but he would only enter the race if the Republican Party nominates Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, and the Democratic Party nominates Bernie Sanders.
He called Jeb and Hillary Clinton "two quality” candidates and "the only two who know how to make the trains run." Jeb reciprocated last month, telling CNN that Bloomberg is "a good person, and he’s a patriot and wants the best for the country.”
At least one of his competitors is eager to see Mike run. "I hope he gets into the race," Donald Trump told Greta Van Susteren on Fox News Wednesday night. "I'd love to compete against him...I would love to see Michael in the race."
That is likely because polling shows Bloomberg would draw most of his support from the Democratic candidate. "Although he is characterized as the New York counterpunch to Trump, Mayor Mike Bloomberg is more the nemesis of Bernie than he is of Donald," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
Bernie Sanders would defeat both Trump and Cruz in a head-to-head match, according to Quinnipiac. But if Bloomberg entered the race, he would win 15 percent of the vote largely from Sanders, giving Trump a one-point victory in the popular vote (and narrowing Cruz's loss to one point).
However, he could throw a major wrench in the Democrats' electoral college total, according to columnist Pat Buchanan.
"Not only would Bloomberg lose the Big Apple, his statewide vote would come mostly from the Democratic nominee, giving Republicans the best opportunity to carry the Empire State since Ronald Reagan coasted to re-election in 1984," wrote Buchanan, who served as White House communications director during Reagan's second term.
“It’s not beyond imagining that he could get in and have an effect on the race,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI, told The Hill.
Perhaps sensing this, numerous Democrats - including Senators Claire McCaskill and Jeanne Shaheen - have thrown cold water on a Bloomberg presidential run.
Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida congresswoman, said this week that an independent Bloomberg candidacy "won't be necessary" - because the Democrats already represent social liberals.
"I really think when he takes a good hard look, he will conclude that the issues that are important to him...[have] a natural home among our Democratic candidates," she said. "And so, I think Michael Bloomberg's agenda is well cared-for and advanced among our Democratic candidates, and his candidacy, I think he will find, won't be necessary.""
His entrance into the race would be a true injection of "New York values" - making him the third or fourth New Yorker in the race - alongside fellow billionaire Trump from Queens, the Brooklyn-born Sanders, and onetime New York Senator Hillary Clinton.
Annie Linskey, a reporter for the Boston Globe who once worked for Bloomberg, told Fox News on Monday that there is "about a four" percent chance that Bloomberg will run.